saurik

12 ms·

121.
by saurik 1y ago
Ok, that's fair: it is always quite disappointing when a project lies about its status (and if I ever get a chance to complain directly about that, I probably will)... but, at least it used to be accurate (and likely was until very rec
122.
by saurik 1y ago
There were a few years where Apache was playing catch-up to nginx, but they were short-lived, and you would be well-served by re-examining it, as I am always reading these threads shaking my head at how much people praise these random tools
123.
by saurik 1y ago
Or you could run the code on the computer, instead of your head, and then view it on the computer as well... the same computer you were going to view the file in the first place? These files aren't being printed on paper... you have ac
124.
by saurik 1y ago
... because of select, and how it became essentially impossible to ensure that a process wasn't using it anywhere, indirectly or incidentally.
125.
by saurik 1y ago
They also killed Periscope right as the explosion of streaming online video happened... Twitter has always been pretty incompetent.
126.
by saurik 1y ago
> ...but let's pretend like it isn't... You can't just do this. If you assume 1=2 all of math falls apart, and the same is true when you assume obviously un-true facts: the reason all of this matters at all is only because
127.
by saurik 1y ago
Yeah: this is all just noise, lies heaped upon lies. At times I've at least felt as if a few of the people involved internally "mean well", despite the company as a whole being evil... but, then I had to realize: their entire
128.
by saurik 1y ago
FWIW, I did that--5 (Instant) with "(do not web search)" tacked on--and it thought the case was real: > Based on my existing knowledge (without using the web), Varghese v. China Southern Airlines Co. is a U.S. federal court cas
129.
by saurik 1y ago
The described mechanism doesn't say the hardware features can't assert the software features, only the other way around: the premise was merely that the software features need to be replaceable; in fact, this is exactly what you w
130.
by saurik 1y ago
Ok, I see: it isn't TME-MK that does it alone -- that is covered by the paper, even, as insufficient -- but this extra "cryptographic integrity protection mode", which is separate and yet not given a fancy name. > Furtherm
131.
by saurik 1y ago
Even if the CPU does not -- as is the case for SEV-SNP -- you can replay prior values. Imagine a variable that contains "the current user is an admin". You can wait for an admin to log in, back up the encrypted copy of that variab
132.
by saurik 1y ago
Particularly when dealing with someone like Trump, who has, on occasion, backed both sides of an issue, depending on the day of the week! ;P
133.
by saurik 1y ago
I think you might be confusing Battering RAM with the recent attacks Heracles and Relocate+Vote? Regardless, these pages are not being "relocated": they are being remapped to a different physical location not to use a different
134.
by saurik 1y ago
Spinning up a Docker container the way I'm kind of assuming you are talking about is going to involve running the compiler in there, which is super annoying -- and extremely limited, as you often are going to get stuck with old version
135.
by saurik 1y ago
You've mentioned multiple times on this thread that Intel has a fix for this in their latest CPUs, but I haven't seen that called out anywhere else... I've only seen the idea that latest CPUs use DDR5 (which also is true of A
136.
by saurik 1y ago
I read that sentence as saying that Siri is an example of something that ISN'T a "weird AI girlfriend": that what they want is Siri but better, as opposed to something that isn't even named in that sentence (but likely i
137.
by saurik 1y ago
> nor is there a simple way to target an older Glibc version without spinning up a docker container ? I feel like you might be falling into the trap of assuming that the compiler always targets the current running system, but you 100% sh
138.
by saurik 1y ago
Maybe legibility should be a ship condition on the first version of the code, not some final destination to eventually achieve. Or like, maybe they need to actually say that, when they claim this is the culmination of years of thought and e
139.
by saurik 1y ago
Ah, OK, so, that isn't actually the issue I am pointing at directly , which might be the confusion! I am not saying that--if you believe that such apps being pulled is, itself, a bad thing (and, a lot of people do, as they want to cla
140.
by saurik 1y ago
I wonder when this study happened? FWIW, there was some pretty intense bombing of full-on nudity content to TikTok a month or two ago--it all looked like very automated bot accounts that were suddenly posting scenes with fully nude content
141.
by saurik 1y ago
FWIW, if you have no problem with what Apple is doing--and a lot of people might not: they might even actively cheer Apple on if they went out of their way to help ICE... not my jam, but a lot of people want to simultaneously be anti-ICE
142.
by saurik 1y ago
FWIW, this much should at least be pretty obvious: if you go far far far out of your way to do something that no one required you to do to defend something that pretty clearly leads to a specific result, you are certainly MORE complicit in
143.
by saurik 1y ago
But that isn't how this has worked, even in places like China where the regime would seem to have that level of power: while they absolutely require Apple--who went out of their way to create a bottleneck on software and information th
144.
by saurik 1y ago
It isn't just our government: Apple sells these devices around the world and they pull the same shit in every jurisdiction, and so the Chinese government has been granted by them an extremely powerful axe to just ban software they disl
145.
by saurik 1y ago
FWIW, you are legally required to pay your taxes, and there are going to be serious consequences to your life and your family's life if you don't; the moral decisions in that situation are much more difficult. However, Apple obvio
146.
by saurik 1y ago
> Tim Cook is a very shareholder-friendly CEO. I feel like John Sculley of all people praising Tim Cook on this point was pretty damning ;P. https://www.cnbc.com/2018/08/03/ex-apple-ceo-john-sculley-co...
147.
by saurik 1y ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45458944 (a quick update in another thread fork)
148.
by saurik 1y ago
I lost--not on the facts, or even on the relevant law, and not even in the district court where we were being heard, but in appeals on a narrow technicality of statute of limitations that we bet our case on (I am explicit about this as Appl
149.
by saurik 1y ago
FWIW, everyone who claims that Apple fundamentally needs the centralized ability to control apps on their platforms "for everyone's safety" -- despite how that obviously and repeatedly makes them become patsies for governme
150.
by saurik 1y ago
I am struggling to believe that the Roman Empire reference for this acronym is "so obvious". I do know about the meme: in fact, what struck me so hard about this is how, for a protocol where you'd almost expect it to be hard

More ›