saurik

50 ms·

751.
by saurik 3y ago
(FWIW, I understood what you meant on my first reading; but, in re-reading to try to understand the confusion, I am guessing the issue is you sort of said the keytones were a side effect "of any of these improvements", as opposed
752.
by saurik 3y ago
Are you unable to cache the zstd-compressed JavaScript in your app server (so as to save the 4.3ms of CPU on every request)? If not, are you sure the 4.3ms of CPU costs less than the 1% of bandwidth? I saw a linked discussion here with a Br
753.
by saurik 3y ago
There is an issue tracking this with a bunch of links to discussions about it, but they continue to not have time it seems. https://github.com/facebook/zstd/issues/3100 This was the first place my mind went w
754.
by saurik 3y ago
I guess if you forward it as content but I'm surprised you don't default always to forwarding as an attachment.
755.
by saurik 3y ago
When you report something as spam to Google they only claim they "might" cause later emails from the same sender to go to your spam folder; regardless, those emails going to one's spam folder doesn't mean they don't
756.
by saurik 3y ago
You can also just get a dedicated clock, and then it will always show the time no matter what your appliances are doing, and you only ever have to do upkeep on the time and maybe-battery of the one time piece.
757.
by saurik 3y ago
What you describe isn't 2FA, though. "SMS two factor" fundamentally precludes the idea that the second factor can be used as a primary factor as then it isn't "two factor" it is "one factor".
758.
by saurik 3y ago
FWIW, I had similar issues trying to get both it and Claude to help me with x86 assembly: it kept thinking if it added another * or some more parentheses it could get some impossible assembly to work.
759.
by saurik 3y ago
Right after reading this thread, I happened to open YouTube and got a notification today about a price increase on YouTube Red from $12.99 to $18.99.
760.
by saurik 3y ago
But, I don't want "origin X", I want "peer-to-peer". I don't want some server somewhere providing the authorization to enter the network by gating the CA: I want a mutually interoperating set of web application
761.
by saurik 3y ago
Yes. I 100% understand why GitHub (and now Microsoft, as well as every other platform) is incentivized to be evil. FWIW, I'd even pay for the CNAME support, as they are then a hosting company, but I also understand why they make more m
762.
by saurik 3y ago
Do we even need "mutual authentication of DTLS certificates", though? I would think it should be sufficient for either the server's certificate to be CA-signed or -- even easier and even better as far as I am concerned (as to
763.
by saurik 3y ago
So, I mostly agree with you--and I certainly think WebRTC is "peer to peer" as I am unsure what the definition of "peer to peer" even would have to be if it weren't--there is a big caveat that I think undermines t
764.
by saurik 3y ago
No one claimed it needed to be true, merely that it is true: if we believe (as you claim you do) the first part of the quote, Apple clearly decided at some point -- maybe due to the dawning realization of this very kind of attack (even
765.
by saurik 3y ago
> The obvious caveat is that git allows any project to pack up and leave anytime they want... People always say this but it just isn't even remotely true. Even if we ignore the "obvious" issue of, well, issues and other im
766.
by saurik 3y ago
If GitHub just would support CNAMEs--like being able to tell it "git.saurik.com" is the canonical host for "github.com/saurik"--this would be a lot more reasonable :(. We even live in a future where it would be triv
767.
by saurik 3y ago
1) FWIW, I understood that, given the xrandr explainer that I linked, which was clearly doing all of that ;P. 2) Regardless, the person I'm replying to was using i3 (and is now using Sway), so I'm thinking that a lot of these limi
768.
by saurik 3y ago
So, what you are saying is that you believe the authors were incorrect when they stated "We observe that the DIT bit set on m3 CPUs effectively disables the DMP."; like, your response to my question is (effectively) "I don&#x
769.
by saurik 3y ago
Maybe it is merely a documentation issue? I keep hearing stories on the one hand of people (such as yourself) who say they failed to get X working with multiple displays... and yet, a ton of software seems to exist predicated on the notion
770.
by saurik 3y ago
Ok. I guess I will switch when it actually breaks, by which time Wayland will be even better than it is today! Or wait, you want me to switch right now ? Because... I guess it hurts your feelings somehow that it hasn't broken for me
771.
by saurik 3y ago
I was definitely doing this kind of thing back in 2009 but I swear also in 2003 by just wrapping the few standard library memory allocation functions and adding a backtrace loop to store information about the caller. I am not sure where the
772.
by saurik 3y ago
It is a grid of embedded YouTube videos, each one of which including "in B-flat" or "in Bb" in the title (and so are pretty much all someone playing some random song on some random instrument... in B-flat).
773.
by saurik 3y ago
I copy/pasted the exact text of the comment you are responding to into Google--including the "Didn't we" and the question mark--and it pulled up the source you couldn't find. https://www.economist.com&#x2
774.
by saurik 3y ago
Give the quote, I don't understand why you think these are different.
775.
by saurik 3y ago
Given the conclusion that a painfully large amount of time is spent re-evaluating procedural macros and that this was largely mitigated by adding a cache, it would seem as if the linked discussion about "const" macros on the Rust
776.
by saurik 3y ago
You are making an assumption that shared libraries have to somehow be compatible with the C ones and use the C dynamic linker: you can 100% have your own dynamic linker and have your little ecosystem work the way you want it to work for y
777.
by saurik 3y ago
Sure. "Condescension", however, definitely does not, afaik for any accent; except... maybe that's the joke? ;P
778.
by saurik 3y ago
Oh, thanks. I somehow remember considering it was obsolete but then had some apparently very wrong reason why that wasn't the case. This matches my understanding better.
779.
by saurik 3y ago
France is on the hook -- along with the rest of the EU -- for having a similar anti-circumvention law to the US (which is part of a treaty that the US pushed forward), but apparently hasn't implemented one yet? I hadn't realized t
780.
by saurik 3y ago
> This is funny because "recursion" and "condescension" are two words that rhyme... "lol"? :(

More ›