Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
saurik
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
39 ms
·
451.
▲
by
saurik
2y ago
> Whether it's one shape or the other doesn't take affect the network protocol underneath. So, the issue I see talks about the API, but the duplication in the specification is at the level of the network protocol: there are dif
452.
▲
by
saurik
2y ago
Why does this contain both data channels and WebTransport? Isn't the latter just more data channels? edit: OK, I found this issue. https://github.com/WICG/local-peer-to-peer/issues/29 Ugh... this is ju
453.
▲
by
saurik
2y ago
Running things in parallel isn't going to make the disk faster... with a HDD I'd think it is actually even more likely to make the disk slower.
454.
▲
by
saurik
2y ago
I mean, the only cases where UDP vs. TCP are going to matter are 1) if you experience packet loss (and maybe you aren't for whatever reason) and 2) if you are willing to actively try to shove other protocols around and not have a conge
455.
▲
by
saurik
2y ago
(FWIW, the "natural numbers" in fact does not include 0: if you include 0 you get the "whole numbers". I otherwise agree with you that 0 isn't at all strange.)
456.
▲
by
saurik
2y ago
Does uBlock leave some kind of explanation in the place of the ad telling you what overall quality of ad it was? Like, the message you are responding to isn't complaining about having to see the link: they are noting that this kind of
457.
▲
by
saurik
2y ago
I don't know. I do know that an incredible number of users do not understand that GitHub is NOT an official anything, and so I feel like we have an existence proof of this being a serious concern. (That said, I also can see an argument
458.
▲
by
saurik
2y ago
While true, using someone else's trademark as a prefix of your name when you are actively intending it to reference the protected use seems egregious.
459.
▲
by
saurik
2y ago
I mean, every day you don't get around to switching just makes switching easier, as Wayland will (presumably) get better over time, so until X actively isn't meeting your needs anymore (which is unlikely to happen randomly either:
460.
▲
by
saurik
2y ago
My favorite part is the question mark you left off of your quote ;P.
461.
▲
by
saurik
2y ago
Sort of? Like, the way it at least used to work, is that there was a MobileSafari.app that used the UIWebDocument class from UIKit.framework and which in turn used WebKit. I don't think anyone is expecting Apple to uninstall the UI wid
462.
▲
by
saurik
2y ago
Have you tried using PCP to forward the port? I was under the (maybe-incorrect, and if so I would really like to learn) impression that most major CG-NAT setups supported it.
463.
▲
by
saurik
2y ago
Great; but, as long as a system supports the open solution, anyone can provide for you the closed one, while the opposite isn't the case.
464.
▲
Siri is Apple's Broken Promise (2011)
(gizmodo.com)
2 points
by
saurik
2y ago
|
0 comments
465.
▲
by
saurik
2y ago
Reminds me of this, from a couple months ago. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41203475
466.
▲
by
saurik
2y ago
Oh oh oh! It in fact now does feel pretty obvious: I missed the part about how if you have this entire stack as one piece you can run it in the browser. Thanks!!
467.
▲
by
saurik
2y ago
I am sure this is obvious and I am just not in the right ecosystem to appreciate the problem, but why do they have to include a Linux emulator to use Wine? Can't I just run Wine?
468.
▲
by
saurik
2y ago
The article isn't saying "don't talk about these old movies at all as it spoils them"; it is, instead, very explicit that this is about "the movie we are seated to see".
469.
▲
by
saurik
2y ago
FWIW, it doesn't handle your use case of Layer 4, but for the people at Layer 7, another option is good ol' Apache: it is so flexible and extensible it is almost a problem, people tend to not know it long ago went event-oriented
470.
▲
by
saurik
2y ago
The article seems to cover this nuance in the next paragraphs?
471.
▲
by
saurik
2y ago
I mean, I've never understood "open source" to require reproducibility? That concept barely even existed as a thing people strove for until 15 years ago, a lot of software still only barely supports such, and there are tons o
472.
▲
by
saurik
2y ago
Without the decentralized discovery service; though, you have nothing; one might as well say that hard disk drives are a decentralized storage solution, as everyone who has a copy of a file by definition has a copy of the file... but, obvio
473.
▲
by
saurik
2y ago
Many people consider(ed) the problem of how to present email in a way that they understand -- not a crazy tree exposing the underlying reply structure -- difficult, as they had never experienced such.
474.
▲
by
saurik
2y ago
The context behind this article is that a lot of people (not me) find the innovative thing about Gmail is precisely that it doesn't render email threads as messages built into trees, but instead clusters them into these flat groups (wh
475.
▲
by
saurik
2y ago
I'm sure this will soon be solved using the hack of accessing shared Wi-Fi fabrics that some ISPs now offer (as in, the thing where the router will offer a generic network such as CoxWiFi, and allow random people to pay to use your WiF
476.
▲
by
saurik
2y ago
While this bug has been around longer than merely since 3.10, I am betting this is the one, based on the description of the issue: https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/84904 (Don't let the associates
477.
▲
by
saurik
2y ago
They didn't say they could have a WiFi device receive this.
478.
▲
by
saurik
2y ago
I do not have access to the original paper, but I would want to see how this compares to 802.11ah "WiFi HaLow". (edit) OK, I got a copy from ResearchGate, and I misunderstood! I had failed to grok the part of the article where LoR
479.
▲
by
saurik
2y ago
It happens before the main loop body but it doesn't happen before the first loop, and it happens after the increment, so I frankly read it initially with skeptical eyes but then felt like it was more intuitive than it was being made ou
480.
▲
by
saurik
2y ago
I also don't, but I am in a third category that somehow never seems to get much representation: I spent some good time 20 years ago to make vim work the way I want, but now I have barely done anything to my configuration since.
More ›