satyrnein

51 ms·

541.
The Rise of the UX Torturer(medium.com)
7 points by satyrnein 12y ago|0 comments
542.
The Case for the Stylus(medium.com)
4 points by satyrnein 12y ago|0 comments
543.
by satyrnein 12y ago
I also thought of software when reading Antifragile, but my take on it is slightly different. For one, software per se is extremely fragile. Variability in inputs can easily break it. New browser version, someone presses buttons in a diff
544.
by satyrnein 13y ago
Good to hear from another old school enthusiast! Perhaps Metro apps were an opportunity to change the behavior and shed legacy compatibility requirements. Another possibility is to target just the web browser; the web has a defined set of
545.
by satyrnein 13y ago
Agreed that there are plenty of ideas that warrant prototyping, but I think there is special value in not having a text cursor to manage at all, similar to how touchscreens obviated mouse cursors for certain tasks.
546.
by satyrnein 13y ago
Actually, my plan was to have the recognition area expand beyond the visual size of the input box as soon as your pen touched the input box, so as not to penalize the user for wandering out of the box a bit, while not having any visually ja
547.
by satyrnein 13y ago
I definitely concur about the handwriting recognition being terrific, but the interface being terrible. I wrote a little prototype of how I thought it should work a few months ago: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zhn6EdN3Vvw
548.
by satyrnein 13y ago
Reading some of the comments here reminds me of the Adam Smith quote: "People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivanc