satellite2

11 ms·

91.
by satellite2 3y ago
It's because of last year tensions around Taiwan and TSMC. Reliance on this company hit an all time high and tensions showed that it was strategically risky. So both side have been pushing local foundries projects via grants and other
92.
by satellite2 3y ago
>The FCC also found evidence during this period that AT&T was overcharging consumers for physical products that had been manufactured by its equipment subsidiary Western Electric, which was itself a monopoly, and using the resulting
93.
by satellite2 3y ago
On hn everything is public so if you only have the time at which two or three posts where submitted you can find the user in question easily.
94.
by satellite2 3y ago
Yes but do the flight crew have the ability to tell if a plane is safe to fly? Without a deep understanding of the design of the plane they rely a lot on the metrics that the plane manufacturer display and on the manufacturers manuals to in
95.
by satellite2 3y ago
I have a hard time parsing the position of the comment in question. As if allowed was just an unfortunate choice of word.
96.
by satellite2 3y ago
He could have made it a profitable year just by cutting his salary.
97.
by satellite2 3y ago
This new, "it's because of liberals, groupthink, wokes" tone is really desacralizing the Economist image.
98.
by satellite2 3y ago
It depends on the drugs. Amphetamines generally display improved cognitive performances in RCTs.
99.
by satellite2 3y ago
That is very much how all criminal laws work.
100.
by satellite2 3y ago
At the same time he violated laws meant to protect investor from losses. But if they didn't actually lose something, it would make sense to have a modest sentence. Not knowing what his reckless behavior actually caused would make the s
101.
by satellite2 3y ago
Nyt is still trying to make me pay their exclusive membership while I read ar most 3 of their articles monthly. Ans I'm still very inclined to pay 12$ and even probably more to get a spotify like subscription for articles but no one is
102.
by satellite2 3y ago
Because it's no longer a linear optimization or curve fitting problem. It becomes a voting or combinatorial problem. Which at least in my mind are two completely different areas of research.
103.
by satellite2 3y ago
And most importantly we trust money to not only be paper or bits
104.
by satellite2 3y ago
> Bank transfers are free in my country even cross country. Try any fancy private bank or a bank on the other side of the world and you'll see. Even national interbank transfer are generally complicated and slow and the complexity o
105.
by satellite2 3y ago
> We love the open-source community and will be releasing the weights for the latest Phind-34B model in the coming weeks. We intend to release the weights for Phind-70B in time as well. I don't understand the utility of this comment
106.
by satellite2 3y ago
His feelings are correctly placed though. Even though macro economists agree the current methodology is the least wrong, they also agree that the BLS series cannot explain why Americans have stopped saving and gone so deeply in debt. A slig
107.
by satellite2 3y ago
Yes I have the same sentiment. It used to be that rate going up would make asset price go down but the market got used to it. Now the rates go down and asset prices go up and the rates go up and asset prices stay the same but rent increases
108.
by satellite2 3y ago
I don't think the price of ram grows linearly with its bits. Manufacturing, shipping, distribution etc. are major costs that are mostly fixed for a single stick I would imagine.
109.
by satellite2 3y ago
Unfortunately, a martyr in Western countries only. I doubt his death will be discussed in Russian's media.
110.
by satellite2 3y ago
In my experience those are pretend experts, that are either shy, either also not comfortable with the material. The one that really understand the material don't hesitate to tell you their real understanding and thoughts pattern even i
111.
by satellite2 3y ago
It seems they oversampled your average Stackoverflow answer: Ackchyually, you don't want to do that
112.
by satellite2 3y ago
At some point, (probably in a relatively close future), there will be the AI Consortium (AIC) to decide what enters the common API?
113.
by satellite2 3y ago
A classic case of Goodhart's law. If your metric is convincing a (rather bad) hiring manager, why even bother? And once you've convinced them, what do you do?
114.
by satellite2 3y ago
I don't really understand your comment. Generally it's accepted that the value went up because it became more rare as the number of unit went down. Or similarly because if all the money represents the price of everything in the ec
115.
by satellite2 3y ago
Because you can invest it in the riskless asset and have a dollar and some interest tomorrow.
116.
by satellite2 3y ago
You are mocking people using a false dichotomy. Complaining that some individuals shouldn't be able to control trillion in wealth don't imply a push for centrally planned economies.
117.
by satellite2 3y ago
The issue here is the genericity if money. I think hardly anyone would argue that he shouldn't make decisions for Amazon. He is probably the best individual for this. The issue is that controlling Amazon also comes with the possibility
118.
by satellite2 3y ago
Title could be changed as "The EPA is proposing that nine PFAS be considered hazardous substances"
119.
by satellite2 3y ago
I'm not a cryptographer so I might miss something but I have the impression that - either a stolen card can be reused thousands of time meaning that it's so easy to get a fake that it's not worth the implementation cost - eit
120.
by satellite2 3y ago
It's a view that's created by a very orthodox approach of the economy. If you look at more modern school of thought the government don't really need taxes to do anything. So for instance according to MMT taxes create an ongoi

More ›