sarcasmOrTears

11 ms·

31.
by sarcasmOrTears 7y ago
One time I met with the head of an union and he told me many tough jobs (mining mainly) were perfomed while on drugs, which aren't available anymore causing all kinds of issues for the workers. I wonder if there was truth in that state
32.
by sarcasmOrTears 7y ago
I hope one day we will be able to condemn these politicians, bureaucrats and big corps for their crimes against free speech, just like we did with the nazis when they tried to subvert Europe. We need serious laws with draconian punishments
33.
by sarcasmOrTears 7y ago
Heads of social media companies meeting with heads of State to discuss what the plebs are and aren't allowed is creepy as hell
34.
by sarcasmOrTears 7y ago
Money laundering? Tax breaks? Not in this case but as a general rule where there is a big, weird, transfer of money
35.
by sarcasmOrTears 7y ago
It's hard to prove but for some strange reason they always have the resources when it's time to come after the little guy and they don't when it's the big guy and it's also more obvious
36.
by sarcasmOrTears 7y ago
I think corporal punishment along with money would be great as punishment when it comes to corporations/rich people. Maybe only for the next 5-6 years, just enough to clean around.
37.
by sarcasmOrTears 7y ago
That's not how it works. The suffering generally comes from the fact that some people can have highlight reels and others can't at all.
38.
by sarcasmOrTears 7y ago
The problem is that some people don't have an highlight reel in their whole life. Nobody thinks the highlight reel is a daily occurence, but at least it happened and for many people happens a lot, hence the well-justified envy. I hope
39.
by sarcasmOrTears 7y ago
Even if something is allowed to be done by everybody it doesn't mean it can be done by everybody. Just look at programming. Lack of ip(patents) shifts the power from those with patents+lawyers to those with skills (workers). Innovators
40.
by sarcasmOrTears 7y ago
Thing is that people should accept a salary that covers the conditions in a contract, including non-compete clauses. Sadly most people don't recognize this, so it seems coercitive action like the one you propose is needed.
41.
by sarcasmOrTears 8y ago
It's worrying how politicians are ignorant of such basic things. Or maybe they act like they ignore them.
42.
by sarcasmOrTears 8y ago
Lowering price of materials allow the creation of new and more goods, so it's always a good thing
43.
by sarcasmOrTears 8y ago
Due to ignorance and propaganda, uninformed people think that socialism is universal healthcare, higher pay, etc They don't know the meaning of the word nor how this ideology works.
44.
by sarcasmOrTears 8y ago
Yeah let's further reduce the ability to switch job, there are already so many opportunities...
45.
by sarcasmOrTears 8y ago
Don't worry, it looks scarier than it is
46.
by sarcasmOrTears 8y ago
Exactly, that's the point. For many reasons these experts are losing their good reputation, that should be the main concern. If they get a good rep again, less and less people are gonna listen to misinformations
47.
by sarcasmOrTears 8y ago
People don't have the tools or the time to understand all this stuff. It's all about trust, good reputation. The only way governments and pharmas have been able to deal with loss of reputation is by trying to ridicule worried peop
48.
by sarcasmOrTears 8y ago
Why people should trust pharma companies considering all the scandals and dick moves? I think we just lost patience and antivaxxers are kinda over-reacting. This is not a problem with misinformation, it's a problem with trust. Patients
49.
by sarcasmOrTears 8y ago
If it keeps going like this the EU is gonna waste all its capital and become poor. Yeah, it looks like economy is still running, but you can't escape the laws of economics. Many don't see it because they're not into politics,
50.
by sarcasmOrTears 8y ago
He evn wrote in the manifesto that the current nz goverment reaction was what he wanted.
51.
by sarcasmOrTears 8y ago
With healthcare you either have a true free market, as in no licenses, no patents, etc or you need the State to regulate it and provide it for everybody. The US has the worst possible combination.
52.
by sarcasmOrTears 8y ago
Your post is at the bottom, as a proof of why we can't have nice things. People don't understand that it's MY webiste, not a property of the users or some EU's fattie bureaucrat. If they don't like my website they c
53.
by sarcasmOrTears 8y ago
It would be much easier to protest for the creation of a law that punishes the attempt to create or the creation of bad laws. After all when you propose a bad law, you can just propose it again and again and again until it gets implemented,
54.
by sarcasmOrTears 8y ago
Don't worry, when podcasts get popular enough the goverments worldwide will find a way to use "regulations to protect consumers" to slowly make podcasts possible and profitable only if you are a big business. Just like it&#x2
55.
by sarcasmOrTears 8y ago
Because goverments give you money
56.
by sarcasmOrTears 8y ago
How do you prove something is disinformation? Time for a ministry of truth? I can imagine already imagine for example which version of the Convington kids case would be considered official and information.
57.
by sarcasmOrTears 8y ago
You should really check out what happened since you're clearly still on the false narrative.
58.
by sarcasmOrTears 8y ago
If I had youtube or facebook I would make different recommendation engines and let people choose one. This should stop the complaining
59.
by sarcasmOrTears 8y ago
Just an example: recently I made a search about korean pilots. Nothing controversial. First page results were all big media. In particular I noticed an article on NYT which was a badly made summary of a blog post that perfectly answered the
60.
by sarcasmOrTears 8y ago
That forest kindergarden looks awesome. Too bad it's a liability hell in basically all western countries. Freedom-oriented laws would solve a lot of problems.

More ›