sangnoir

46 ms·

781.
by sangnoir 2y ago
I heard he was doing code reviews at Twitter... on code printed on paper to determine of he ought to fire or keep the author.
782.
by sangnoir 2y ago
Well, Elon Musk is holding AI development ransom unless he's granted sufficient shares in Tesla to take his holdings above 25%. So I suppose they can give him billions to solve for self-driving the "easy" way, or the "ha
783.
by sangnoir 2y ago
Is the assumption here is that we can somehow understand the nature of the universe if we stop censoring the common man and have an unmuzzled LLM that talks like him instead of the Bay Area AI elites? My uneducated guess is well learn more
784.
by sangnoir 2y ago
His hype-machine has made some of those who invest on his hype very rich, including through worthless instruments such as meme stocks he was pumping.
785.
by sangnoir 2y ago
> So he ran a red light, driving into the crowd, and then shot a guy who yelled at him for it because the yelling guy was carrying a gun. So one can't exercise their first and second amendment rights simultaneously in free Texas? Or
786.
by sangnoir 2y ago
Texas is also a "constitutional-carry" state. The other person being merely armed should not be material (if Texas were consistent in applying the law.)
787.
by sangnoir 2y ago
> When terminating a service, temporarily place it in a state where the service is unavailable but all data is retained and can be restored at the push of a button. Discard the data after a few days. This provides an opportunity for the
788.
by sangnoir 2y ago
> Too bad there's no "Stephen Carter" to provide testimony for imitating ScarJo. It's amusing to think of an AI giving testimony in lawsuit, though. Perhaps Andrey Karpathy if he has a change if heart - he's been
789.
by sangnoir 2y ago
> There is a very strong music copyright system in the US and in the Tom Waits case they had both music and voice impersonation. The article explicitly mentions the Tom Waits case did not include a copyright component as he didn't
790.
by sangnoir 2y ago
I was - thank you! I should have realized the story belongs to the Culture universe. Is there a story where non-sentient automation takes over society and leaves humanity by the wayside? Not malicious, sentient AI subjugating humanity (li
791.
by sangnoir 2y ago
> Your workers are a tiny portion of your customer base. Let some other sap pay theirs well. Other companies notice your "brilliant" strategy and start adopting it, and now your sales are in terminal decline as your customer ba
792.
by sangnoir 2y ago
> As AI and automation improve, the majority of people will have negligible economic utility Who's going to subscribe to Prime and buy stuff when everyone is poor? The Walmart/Amazon wage strategy only works if the rest of soci
793.
by sangnoir 2y ago
> Because you’re already using other software that has LLM integration Oh really, which software would that be? And which other LLM-enabled software connects production environments or has access to auth credentials/tokens?
794.
by sangnoir 2y ago
It appears your issue is not with the comment at the head of this thread specifically, but generally with other comments elsewhere (on HN and Github); that doesn't make the comment disrespect or untrue by association. AI is a lightni
795.
by sangnoir 2y ago
> What's your threat model? Why do you ask, will you help with designing a mitigation plan? I'll humor you: It's a turnkey gadget for sniffing/exfiltrating the output of any open iTerm2 shell.
796.
by sangnoir 2y ago
It's not disrespectful.
797.
by sangnoir 2y ago
What is disrespectful about gp's comment? It's okay to disagree with decisions made by even the most dedicated maintainers; I've switched to software (forks, or similar projects) many times on principle - I respect JetBrains,
798.
by sangnoir 2y ago
> It's absolutely rediculous that supporting something, thats opt-in not opt-out is causing a ruckus iTerm is pretty extensible, and there are other ways of making the AI bloat (IMO) opt-in, without including it in the core software
799.
by sangnoir 2y ago
> 10Gbps is absolutely great, but then the city might create an entire bureaucratic structure around it and in 30 years when it's not great anymore the apparatus won't die or be displaced like a company eventually would I would
800.
by sangnoir 2y ago
> The great thing about a private company "overcharging" or "underserving" a community is that citizens aren't forced to be in a relationship with that company for their services. This is a hilarious thing to say
801.
by sangnoir 2y ago
I was mildly surprised when the article quoted a senior at the bank framing the situation as a feeble, lone teller vs a well-oiled theft industry - as if the teller doesn't have resources of a multi-billion-dollar corporation - perhaps
802.
by sangnoir 2y ago
> Sounds like one of those situations you'd have to prove intent. The discovery process may help figuring the intent - especially any internal communication before and after the two(!) failed attempts to get her sign-off, as well as
803.
by sangnoir 2y ago
> Claimed that the existing training of the Sky voice was voiced by her? That claim could very well be true. The letter requested information on how the voice was trained - OpenAI may not want that can of worms opened lest other celebrit
804.
by sangnoir 2y ago
...and sama's tweet referencing "Her"
805.
by sangnoir 2y ago
> The crime is in the training: did they use her voice or not? This is a civil issue, and actors get broad rights to their likeliness. Kim Kardashian sued Old Navy for using a look-alike actress in an ad; old Navy chose to settle, which
806.
by sangnoir 2y ago
Participation in culture war skirmishes is not mandatory - I don't read the vast majority of links or discussions posted to HN. Ironically, preemptively preventing any discussion on topics you don't like on ideological grounds, by
807.
by sangnoir 2y ago
> I don't think we can say that the top comment is the majority/prevailing opinion I just realized were using different meanings of prevail - you (and likely gp) are using it as a synonym for majority/widespread, I was
808.
by sangnoir 2y ago
I disagree with you - close to 100% of people who open the comments will read the top comment. Less than 100% will read the next highest top-level comment - the reply/rebuttal to the top comment gets more eyeballs than the #2 top-level
809.
by sangnoir 2y ago
> I don’t think you’re being fair, and I do think this often repeated myth of the HN hive mind¹ I think it's totally fair to call the top comment (most upvoted) the "prevailing opinion". That said, I suspect it's a si
810.
by sangnoir 2y ago
Typically there is no penalty - and contracts explicitly declare that all clauses are severable so that the rest of the contract remains valid even if one of the scare-clauses is found to be invalid. IANAL

More ›