samrus

11 ms·

211.
by samrus 7mo ago
I far prefer perplexity for that. The fact that it always cites its sources is great. And it has a search bar widget for android, and search bar integration for firefox so its pretty easy to use.
212.
by samrus 7mo ago
No this is product and finance. Product wants more features because that looks better to leadership. And finance likes ads
213.
by samrus 7mo ago
I know you dont to hear this, but theres just a hump to get over with this. Same with any investment. Youll be laughing 50 years down the line. Consider this a tree you might not get to sit under but will give shade to future generations
214.
by samrus 7mo ago
That seems more like independant collaboration. Someoje built something without getting 10 cook to taste the broth. If its good, then someone will identify it for its merits and then build on top of it
215.
by samrus 7mo ago
But the problem wont be the robots. Itll be the flood of new workers who will offer to rehab the place cheaper than you. And itll be that the white collar owners of the house wont have enough money to blow on a rehab bwcause their desk jobs
216.
by samrus 7mo ago
I dont want to suffer the consequences of using a microsoft operating system. Id rather use linux or even mac
217.
by samrus 7mo ago
i dont like this class of criticism. mostly because i find myself do it alot. it doesnt matter if the tool used is simple, if it generates value then its a good idea what should this fallacy be called? ad implementum? ad modum?
218.
by samrus 7mo ago
you know, given that i've often said "if youre getting it for free, your the product" i am ok with this its not really possible for the rights holder to compete with a free product, since they arent harvesting data or oxploit
219.
by samrus 7mo ago
Thats how supply demand works right? Its a stable equilibrium. When supply is low, prices rises to entice supply, supply increases to match demand, prices fall, the rate of increase of supply falls as well until supply approaches to meet de
220.
by samrus 7mo ago
I think the pipeline needs to be plugged at both ends. We shouldnt allow this data to be sold without express consent. And we shouldnt allow the government to purchase this sort of data regardless of consent, protected under the 4th amendme
221.
by samrus 7mo ago
But the question is if its a net negative for society. People found real utility is leaded gasoline too, but we rightfully had to ban that
222.
by samrus 7mo ago
If transportation, housing, and food were paid for by giving private corporations and they demanded to incade our privacy as payment then i would be against that too actually
223.
by samrus 7mo ago
If you desired to inject heroin into your veins, that wouldnt mean we should decriminalize it
224.
by samrus 7mo ago
Thats a bit pedantic. Youre still arguing against an entity rather than addressing the argument. If you prompted an LLM to make a PSA that people should brush their teeth, is it a fair to argue that brushing your teeth is bad because an LLM
225.
by samrus 7mo ago
When the roman republic collapsed, they were still at their upwards inflection point. Ceasar was still on a roll. They hadnt peaked yet. This feels more like when the empire was in the early stages of coming down from its peak. I think the
226.
by samrus 7mo ago
Twotter as a data source is interesting. I think it gets over hyped because thats elons grift. But i cant deny that the real time info aspect of it is pretty valuable. But i definitely think that its not that much more valuable than the ope
227.
by samrus 7mo ago
> That the product is locked down by design is a feature, not a limitation. > Yes, this has the side effect of making them more money and allowing a walled garden to form Come on now. This is so naive. Why not lock your computer down
228.
by samrus 7mo ago
Has to be the cost. A reusable launch vehicle is such a ridiculously better value proposition that it creates a discrete evolution. Some things just arent feasible to do without them
229.
by samrus 7mo ago
> No, you tried to persuade it not to with a single instruction Even persuade is too strong a word. These things dont have the motivation needed to enable persuation being a thing. Whay your client did was put one data point in the conte
230.
by samrus 7mo ago
Theres alot of talk about how the cops just misused the tool and its their fault not the AIs Thats missing the point here. The point is that these tools provide crazy leverage, and thay can be good or bad. If used carefully it can definitel
231.
by samrus 7mo ago
Meh. Americans showed in vietnam and iraq that they dont just go along with wars they think are bullshit This could make americans hate iran and demand retribution, but i think its more likely to make americans made at israel and their own
232.
by samrus 7mo ago
Let people decide that. This particular thought for example is interesting. Its about a shift in the UX of agentic development that i do feel is severly lacking. Its the kind of thing that seeks obvious once pointed out. People was to be pa
233.
by samrus 7mo ago
Karpathy is more of a thought leader than most CEOs tbf. I find that instead of hyping up things to male more money, he genuinely discusses things he thinks are interesting and offers very good insights on them. He coined the term vibecodin
234.
by samrus 7mo ago
Medtech company males complete sense. Iran's strategy seems to be to tighten the screws on US citizens so they put pressure on the government to stop the war. They seem to be doing that with things like higher gas prices, and now delay
235.
by samrus 7mo ago
That second B has alot of customers. Sick and dying customers that arent very flexible on demand
236.
by samrus 7mo ago
True. But lego has stood the test of time. Thats way harder
237.
by samrus 7mo ago
> If his ideas had real substance, we would have seen substantial results by now This is naive. Like saying if backprop had any real substance, it would have had results within 10 years of its publication in 1989 > Your chronological
238.
by samrus 7mo ago
The pitch isnt to try to squeeze money out of a product like altman does. Its to lay the groundwork for the next evolution in AI. Llms were built on decades of work and theyve hit their limits. We'll need to invest alot of time buildin
239.
by samrus 7mo ago
Its a matter of needing more time, which is a resource even SV VCs are scared to throw around. Look at the timeline of all these advancements and how long it took Lecun introduced backprop for deep learning back in 1989 Hinton published abo
240.
by samrus 7mo ago
Whats the first L stand for? Thats not just vestogial, their model of the world is formed almost exclusively from language rather than a range of things contributing significantly like for humans. The biggest thing thats missing is actual f

More ›