Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
samlambert
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
91.
▲
by
samlambert
1y ago
it should be pretty much the same for aurora serverless and likely even cheaper. we see some astronomically expensive auorora serverless bills. We have not made max_standby_streaming_delay configurable yet. What's your use case? I don&
92.
▲
by
samlambert
1y ago
Not true and has never been true for Postgres. Vitess was like this for a while but we shipped FKs for Vitess 2 years ago.
93.
▲
by
samlambert
1y ago
it is kubernetes
94.
▲
by
samlambert
1y ago
Please reach out to us we would love to talk to you about testing PlanetScale and seeing if we can drive your costs down and performance up.
95.
▲
by
samlambert
1y ago
hosting on AWS/GCP on the ephemeral NVMe nodes. https://planetscale.com/metal
96.
▲
by
samlambert
1y ago
Performance differences between PlanetScale and Supabase: https://planetscale.com/benchmarks/supabase
97.
▲
by
samlambert
1y ago
we will aim to make it as easy as possible and doable as an online process. with sharding there is always a chance that some application changes are needed so there might be some work required there.
98.
▲
by
samlambert
1y ago
Kind of. For horizontally scaling writes we are building the Vitess for Postgres which we are calling Neki https://www.neki.dev/ The product we are GA'ing today has the option of PlanetScale Metal which is extremely fa
99.
▲
by
samlambert
1y ago
We don't do anything special (yet) but we do have bloat detection that we warn you about. We've noticed that autovacuum works very well on our Metal product because of the extra resources.
100.
▲
by
samlambert
1y ago
corrected. thank you
101.
▲
by
samlambert
1y ago
If anyone has questions about our Postgres product please feel free to ask. I will be around to answer.
102.
▲
by
samlambert
1y ago
lol no they both read as permissive on the surface. apache 2 doesn't include a termination clause that broadly protects an entity against any litigation. this is incredibly broad and not community safe.
103.
▲
by
samlambert
1y ago
This is not an open source license and it's untrue to say it's an open source project when it's licensed this way. "IF ANY LITIGATION IS INSTITUTED AGAINST SUPABASE, INC. BY A LICENSEE OF THIS SOFTWARE, THEN THE LICENSE
104.
▲
by
samlambert
1y ago
this is so awesome to see. thank you for writing this post.
105.
▲
by
samlambert
1y ago
It is but we've been giving people access. If you are interested then email postgres@planetscale.com
106.
▲
by
samlambert
1y ago
if it's going down and causing reputation damage then $1 a month is too expensive.
107.
▲
by
samlambert
1y ago
I'd be happy to show you around PlanetScale if there is interest.
108.
▲
by
samlambert
1y ago
this is great to see. thank you for the write up.
109.
▲
by
samlambert
1y ago
he left PlanetScale 4 years ago.
110.
▲
by
samlambert
1y ago
There is nothing as mature as Vitess in the Postgres world. But PlanetScale the company behind Vitess is building a Postgres sharding project.
111.
▲
by
samlambert
1y ago
what's the news here? that if you double the CPU and tune postgres it's better?
112.
▲
The principles of extreme fault tolerance
(planetscale.com)
1 points
by
samlambert
1y ago
|
0 comments
113.
▲
by
samlambert
1y ago
Simon I am a huge fan of your work. If you create a PlanetScale org and email me the name I will give you early access (free on us of course) s@planetscale.com
114.
▲
by
samlambert
1y ago
We've really enjoyed working with Postgres to bring this product to market. I am here if anyone has questions.
115.
▲
by
samlambert
1y ago
no. fundamentally different architectures.
116.
▲
by
samlambert
1y ago
so proud of you Mike. we still regularly talk about how we miss you. i am so glad you are doing well.
117.
▲
by
samlambert
2y ago
it's a lot of complexity and cost for a service that is already replicating 3 ways. 6x replication for a single node's disks seems excessive.
118.
▲
by
samlambert
2y ago
it's not a contradiction but there is nuance. local disks mean we can do a significant amount of the operations involved in a write locally without every block going over the network. It's true that a replica has to acknowledge it
119.
▲
by
samlambert
2y ago
it's hard to know for sure. it might be that or it might just present a number that is confusing to most.
120.
▲
by
samlambert
2y ago
we have a lot more content like this on the way. if anyone has feedback or questions let us know.
More ›