sametmax

32 ms·

301.
by sametmax 7y ago
When "everything becomes easy and self organized", it's generally because there is an implicit leader that makes it so. You may not see the leader, as he or she may have no title or recognition. But it's the person that
302.
by sametmax 7y ago
Most flat org I've seen are not flat. The people naturally organised in tribes that are only known by themself, and that are in no organigram. Each tribe have an implicit leader that bears no title yet influences all decisions just by
303.
by sametmax 7y ago
Fun idea. The naming is weird as pylon used to be a python web framework but since it's not going to have any chance to become popular, overriding it seems alright.
304.
by sametmax 7y ago
And most people don't bave that kind of money, already have a mortage to pay and must rent anyway.
305.
by sametmax 7y ago
Netflix has been at it for a decade. Give it 5 years. I don't expect the GAFAM to play fair. They are going to arm wrest the industry to go through them.
306.
by sametmax 7y ago
Amazon and disney just have more firepower. Amazon has the expertise in hosting, disney in content making. Amazon can drain customers with prime, and disney with the existing portfolio. Both have infinite cash to aquire and create new licen
307.
by sametmax 7y ago
In some countries yes.
308.
by sametmax 7y ago
Mac donald's seems to do exactly that.
309.
by sametmax 7y ago
Except netflix will probably die and you'll get the choice between 2 bullies : amazon and disney. Also I have a hard time feeling sorry for the traditional press. They spend decades killing their own reputation and now paying the price
310.
by sametmax 7y ago
Because: - it's only an experimental additional source of revenue. They already got money covered, they are just trying to find new way to become more financially independent. - they don't intend to sell the current state of Firef
311.
by sametmax 7y ago
I'm pretty sure you are right now paying a lot more money to companies doing a lot less efforts Mozilla is currently doing. And now you are asking even more of them, just as a condition for maybe giving them something day. See, that&#x
312.
by sametmax 7y ago
Precisely. And if you have enough veggies and vegans around you, you know that they can eat as much junk food as everyone else. Sugar is vegan, after all.
313.
by sametmax 7y ago
I'd agree with wifi and cell phones being introduced in a slower way actually. We don't need a 100 years though, since there is only one thing to check: if it affects us directly. We don't have the same cascading effect poten
314.
by sametmax 7y ago
There is a purpose in that for the colony, so it evolved that way. And of course it took time, and a lot of small adaptive trials, to get there. There is not purpose in that for the plant, hence it would not have evolved that way. And of co
315.
by sametmax 7y ago
- studies != audits - most of those studies are used to demonstrate if something is doable. Few are targeting safety, even fewer are long enough or on a large scale enough to answer the previously raised concerned, and almost none are by in
316.
by sametmax 7y ago
Most people didn't see any danger to something as simple as sugar 30 years ago. We added it everywhere, and now have an obese US population with sky high diabetes levels. Sugar is not complicated. The millions of DNA pairs of the milli
317.
by sametmax 7y ago
Because of agenda, scale, speed, scale, intertia and power. See other comments.
318.
by sametmax 7y ago
Food irradiation in general is yet another issue, that deserves a different threat.
319.
by sametmax 7y ago
Anthrax is not cultivated by the most invasive specy of the planet, given artificial characteristics to be optimized only for economic incentive, and would have never be allowed by natural selection to have such things as the terminator gen
320.
by sametmax 7y ago
And pricey
321.
by sametmax 7y ago
Because it worked for a lot longer than 20 years. In 100 years, without GMO problems, we can label them safe too. Plus evolution doesn't have an agenda that would make it creates things like the terminator gene. We are in a very peculi
322.
by sametmax 7y ago
In the same way that a tiger killing a rabit is not the same thing than a human with a nuclear weapon. Power, scale, agenda and synergies matter.
323.
by sametmax 7y ago
It's too early to tell. But when we build a nuclear reactor, we don't just make safety systems for likely events. We make them also for very, very unlikely ones. Because the potential risk is huge. It's the same here. The po
324.
by sametmax 7y ago
One is using a self-safe system that has been tuned for balance for 1000000 of years and have a proven track record and no agenda. The second one is made by a few smart people for only 20 years for money. The second one has to prove to be s
325.
by sametmax 7y ago
20 years is amazingly short for ecosystems. Give it a century. Also, it took us 40 years to realize we may be responsible for global warning, and some still doubt it, or have an agenda to spread doubt. So you have to take in consideration t
326.
by sametmax 7y ago
Sure. That doesn't invalidate my point though. Let's not trust that things will go according to plan, or that the people making the plan have the proper agenda.
327.
by sametmax 7y ago
Things like this are more a reflect of a general spirit, and fought as a symbol.
328.
by sametmax 7y ago
Firefox is probably still a legacy mix of XUL, cpp and migrating to rust. I'm pretty sure chrome is easier to adapt.
329.
by sametmax 7y ago
Because we have very little feedback on the long term effect of new bio techs. Because they have the potential to have a cascading effect on human healt and the entire ecosystem. Because the people selling them have no incentive to make sur
330.
by sametmax 7y ago
Can you use alternative app store on your non sign-in apple device without rooting it ? Because on android you can.

More ›