salvar

8 ms·

31.
by salvar 8y ago
Your hotel example is pretty absurd, because there's no friction involved in carrying around a hotel room key. There is significant friction involved in memorizing a long password. So no, it's not "how most of the world alrea
32.
by salvar 8y ago
The claim was that nothing else will take off to the point of becoming a password killer. 2FA doesn't try to replace passwords.
33.
by salvar 8y ago
Thanks. I wouldn't characterize this as "users aren't willing to install any more apps" though; that's quite the leap from the conclusion of the report.
34.
by salvar 8y ago
That's not a UX study. That's a UX anecdote.
35.
by salvar 8y ago
> The core issue is that people aren't willing to install any more apps. Is there any source for this? Are app installations declining?
36.
by salvar 8y ago
What UX study did you do? All I saw was a mockup. Maybe I misunderstood.
37.
by salvar 8y ago
Well I was hoping for something stronger than your personal anecdotes to back this assertion up. In any case, crayons and tablets are not mutually exclusive choices. You can in fact use both, and other things as well.
38.
by salvar 8y ago
When one of the ads in your ad gets clicked, what do you think is the most likely reason? That a child was interested in the product and wanted to get more information before making a decision?
39.
by salvar 8y ago
Why do you say "stare blankly"? My young organism stares anything but blankly at the iPad screen when he's allowed to use it. I think you're painting phone/tablet usage in a very negative light here, as if parents a
40.
by salvar 8y ago
Of course it isn't that black and white, and I don't think that was the point. I'd interpret it as: Your company is participating in something that, when looked at as a whole, has become something that you could call a legiti
41.
by salvar 8y ago
> Why use Twitter for such things, given its limitations? It has limitations, but it also has a lot of reach. A blog might not reach the people you are trying to share things with.
42.
by salvar 8y ago
Have you considered the cost of the profilee in these cases? What if they don't want to be the subject of a teachable moment for some prejudiced person? Would you tell them that they are wrong?
43.
by salvar 8y ago
In that case, I apologize. I mistook your comments on pooping in cereal and calling people turds as anger. My bad.
44.
by salvar 8y ago
Even if you see no reason to bring it up, and it frustrates you to see other people mention it, it shouldn't stop other people from discussing that angle. Allow yourself to read something without getting angry because you don't li
45.
by salvar 8y ago
Thanks for explaining. My point about exaggeration was about describing racial profiling and corporate data collection as comparable injustices. I think if you'd tell a victim of lifelong racial profiling that they're really just
46.
by salvar 8y ago
Yeah I get what you mean. I was just making a bad argument delivered in an unnecessarily snarky way. All good.
47.
by salvar 8y ago
I'm legitimately confused. What should I not do?
48.
by salvar 8y ago
I agree with the benefits of what you describe in the last paragraph. But for these opportunities for people to learn by realizing that their unfair profiling of customers based on the color of their skin is wrong... at what point do you co
49.
by salvar 8y ago
This looks like a strawman. I didn't see anyone claim that all shopping experiences everywhere should be replaced with this. Amazon Go definitely requires you to have a bunch of things many people don't have access to, and can amo
50.
by salvar 8y ago
> How can they understand if they never have the chance to talk to the other side Are you saying that profiling people in stores is literally the only chance people have to talk to "the other side"? How about they use any other
51.
by salvar 8y ago
Yeah that's fair. It was a weak argument.
52.
by salvar 8y ago
What exactly is the "poop in the cereal" here? Mentioning race? Do you think race has absolutely nothing to do with anything here?
53.
by salvar 8y ago
Works great unless you need to live in a society with other people and other schedules.
54.
by salvar 8y ago
Sure, but my point is that interpreting the narrative of the article to only apply to black people, and not other types of profiling in shops, is pretty unfair.
55.
by salvar 8y ago
> People should stop talking for others Other people should do that you say?
56.
by salvar 8y ago
I think it's better in the short term, and the long term. Those removed humans have plenty of other opportunities to address their prejudices, and profiling innocent shoppers based on their skin color isn't actually necessary.
57.
by salvar 8y ago
Why do you assume that the experience is ephemeral? It sounds like you're trying to downplay the experience of black people being profiled in stores. I think that for people that have to deal with this kind of discrimination day in day
58.
by salvar 8y ago
Maybe not the specific narrative of the article, but surely whatever the profiling looks like the narrative of "In Amazon Go, you're not profiled based on your looks" fits.
59.
by salvar 8y ago
> The point is saying summer time is better than winter time regardless you where you live is meaningless True, but who said this? The grandparent only said that they were happy about the decision in their location. No one stated that su
60.
by salvar 8y ago
The timezone does dictate what part of the day we generally call "evening" though.

More ›