salawat

12 ms·

181.
by salawat 7mo ago
>Force-set to 0, "mask"/deactivate those representations associated with bad/dangerous emotions. Neural Prozac/lobotomy so to speak. Jesus Christ. You're talking psychosurgery, and this is the same barbarism
182.
by salawat 7mo ago
>The weird part is that we're now basically managing the psychological state of our tooling, Does no one else have ethical alarm bells start ringing hardcore at statements like these? If the damn thing has a measurable psychology, m
183.
by salawat 7mo ago
Violence is coming whether you like it or not. People are already struggling and food prices will only go up this year given the buffoonery with antagonizing Iran. If we're going to have violence either way, I sure know where I'd
184.
by salawat 7mo ago
Get/Force a cooperative Senate. Until we do, the defense/check doesn't exist. House can raise Articles, but if the Senate refuses to move on them...
185.
by salawat 7mo ago
Researchers need to quit being pulling punches and acknowledge these systems are for all intents and purposes proto-sophontic. No one in the industry is going to, and if we leave it to them, we'll be treating things that demonstrate a
186.
by salawat 7mo ago
Federal minimum wage is $7.25, so... Friendo, you need to work on your arthmetic. You have 50 cents worth of hedge, and $1.25 in proving the opposite of your claim.
187.
by salawat 7mo ago
:tabnew<Enter>a Begone Emacs harlot! The user's of the one true universal editor will not be done away with so easily!<Esc>:wq!
188.
by salawat 7mo ago
We had safety measures. It was called the Electoral College, and the entire reason it was put there was to get a small group of people separated from groupthink to really think " Are you SURE this is the right candidate?" Then s
189.
by salawat 7mo ago
I don't think we should change it. I think we as a nation need to understand the person we put in that office has that power, and choose accordingly . It's there for a reason. Sometimes, it's perfectly acceptable for the Pre
190.
by salawat 7mo ago
Ah hahahaha. Yeah... No. Contrary to popular belief, the 2-300 year old upstart that is the United States doesn't have a magical lynchpin it can pull to get the other longstanding nations of the world to acquiesce entirely. If the U.S
191.
by salawat 7mo ago
So what were the contrived reasons? I navigated getting coolwsd built before, but never quite got my user management layer for Nextcloud perfected to the point of going live... I thought it was a good piece of kit, but was a little bit skep
192.
by salawat 7mo ago
Yes. You're dopamine hacking yourself. All probabilistic programs come with this type of risk. You need to be actively on guard against it. Yes, the providers are absolutely incentivized to keep you interacting with the system to make
193.
by salawat 7mo ago
Perhaps you don't understand peon. The technologist is there to take orders and execute. You thought you were being given input/a voice at the table? God, no. That's above your station. Now go on, shoo. Let the monied people
194.
by salawat 7mo ago
Categorical imperative and Golden Rule, or as you may know it from game theory "tit-for-tat" says "hi". The beautiful thing about ethics is that we philosophers intentionally teach it descriptively, but encourage one to
195.
by salawat 7mo ago
No, it's ethical people pointing out that if you toss aside ethics for success at all costs, you aren't going to find any sympathy when people start doing the same thing back to you. Live by the sword, die by the sword, as they sa
196.
by salawat 7mo ago
Their business shouldn't exist. It was predisposed on non-permissive IP theft. They may have found a judge willing to cop to it not being so, but the rest of the public knows the real score. And most problematically for them, that mean
197.
by salawat 7mo ago
Rich people aren't going to find themselves needing to sleep under a bridge, so the law really only exists as a constraint on the poor. Duh. The flex that "well a rich guy couldn't do it either" is A) at best a myopic mi
198.
by salawat 7mo ago
Because an entire generation of aspiring programmers grew up blindly trusting code from others they never met in real life, and never actually bothered to read half the time. Given that all you need to do is infiltrate a transitive dependen
199.
by salawat 7mo ago
Because "laws for thee, not for me", that's why.
200.
by salawat 7mo ago
>I’m half with you. No, you're full with me, you just don't realize it yet. And yes. Your split is so tantalizingly almost there. On the LLM's being conscious front, the nature of consciousness being fundamentally intertwi
201.
by salawat 7mo ago
And the reason why is those things must be profitable, and once you accept everything must be profitable, there is no ceiling to exploitation. Whereas with big things like Apollo, we didn't do it because it would make money. We did i
202.
by salawat 7mo ago
>not even on philosophical basis Why do you set aside a philosophical basis as a harder goal to reach? Shit, give them a persistent self-narrative tracking loop, and Functionalism and Identity of Indiscernables already tells you you shou
203.
by salawat 7mo ago
Bungie game. https://www.marathonthegame.com/ One of the original shooters where you're a Marine getting orchestrated by a series of warring AI at different stages of rampantcy.
204.
by salawat 7mo ago
More like "We want your money, but don't want to provide service." Are you sure OpenAI isn't morphing into a finance/insurance company?
205.
by salawat 7mo ago
When your definition of innovation includes "move fast, break things, ignore regulations until you can scale big enough for the lawyers hopefully to outpace the legal system" it is arguable that any of that should be allowed at al
206.
by salawat 7mo ago
>How do we draw the line? Without regulations in place how is it fair to say companies are negligent in allowing people to become addicted to their products? How about, "If it involves exploiting aspects of human psychology that hav
207.
by salawat 7mo ago
Here's the thing, get used to single big commits. Eventually, somebody is going to try to train on specific change sets. This'll enable models to learn specific authors mannerisms, idiosyncracies etc... Single large commits create
208.
by salawat 7mo ago
>Obviously subservient people default to being yes-men because of the power structure. No one wants to question the boss too strongly. This drives me nuts as a leader. There are times where yes, please just listen, and if this is one of
209.
by salawat 7mo ago
Google is NN's all the way down these days. There might still be an honest index under it all, but a truly accurate representation of the Web has been effectively outlawed in the U.S. since DMCA.
210.
by salawat 7mo ago
Funny thing for me, is it's not the LLM lying to me. It's the creators. The LLM is just doing what it's weights tell it to. I'll admit, I went a bit nuclear the first time I ran one locally and observed it's outputs

More ›