salawat

38 ms·

751.
by salawat 1y ago
We can focus on more than a single thing at a time. I'm also more worried about Palantir and such as well.
752.
by salawat 1y ago
I won't touch them due to the ethical taint. No matter how much deep down I disagree with IP laws; I cannot condone the actions that went into these models creation.
753.
by salawat 1y ago
It may come from Jon Stewart who has used wrestling analogies in reference to other parts of Trump's foreign policy. When looked at through a wrestling lens, the surreality and absurdity of this admin at least...has precedent, I guess?
754.
by salawat 1y ago
The cookie preference pop-up is a cookie. To track your preference, they need a cookie. We legally mandated a cookie. They're using the cookie regardless. But no one will call them on it until a critical mass is reached to get cases in
755.
by salawat 1y ago
This is why things involving cookies for permission to do things were really poison pills. As long as there is a cookie to be tracked, any at all , you have the data exfil/tracking problem. Only thing that changes is where the aggrega
756.
by salawat 1y ago
Fair. I see your angle now. 100% with you. >Why isn't there a popular Android fork which runs all the same apps but provides a better permissions model or greater visibility into what apps are doing? Besides every possible attempt b
757.
by salawat 1y ago
What laws are you referring to other than Terms of Service which are entirely artificial constructs whisked into existence by service/platform providers? Which will, admittedly, be as draconian and onesided as the courts will allow. Ag
758.
by salawat 1y ago
Any Jitsi deployment? Let's be clear here. Meta/other sites are abusing the technology TURN/WebRTC for a purpose it was never intended for, way beyond the comfortable confines of innocent hackery, and we all know it. That&#x2
759.
by salawat 1y ago
Ding, ding, ding. Welcome to the "Circus of Globalist's Externalities come home to Roost!" At a certain point, you as a country can only be said to be capable of what you can do without external aid . The possibility that yo
760.
by salawat 1y ago
Correct. In point of fact, payment cards/merchant networks are quite literally just that. You get a credential, and that credential can be revoked if you get up to something sufficiently heinous to warrant the ostracizing. People would
761.
by salawat 1y ago
If it is sentient, using it like a tool for workloads means we should be treating it as an equivalent being with rights. That means paying/compensating it. And no, you blasted bastards salivating to just get your hands on something you
762.
by salawat 1y ago
I am also curious.
763.
by salawat 1y ago
It's not a shift in core values, but rather the critical mass many of us warned about whereby once technology advanced sufficiently to facilitate a centralization push, we had to have enough distributed to defuse otherwise we'd be
764.
by salawat 1y ago
They shouldn't. The generations with morals are rapidly being attritioned out, and it'll be a while for new backbone to set. It's going to get worse before it gets better.
765.
by salawat 1y ago
It shouldn't exist. Some things shouldn't be made. It's our job as decent people to pointedly not make them due to their inherent harm potential.
766.
by salawat 1y ago
Any problem that requires cryptographic attestation or technical control of all endpoints is not a solution we should be pursuing. Think of it as a tainted primitive. Not to be implemented. The problem of Trust is a human problem, and throw
767.
by salawat 1y ago
Public safety will be the undoing of all personal liberty if it is allowed.
768.
by salawat 1y ago
Cool. Are you paying for it for them? Everyone loves that answer, but no one wants to pony up for the retraining, or if they do, they insist the retraining meets their sensibilities. Next time you run through that line of logic, think abou
769.
by salawat 1y ago
Malicious compliance is not the answer here. The system should not be made. Period. It's a primitive kept out of current existence due to it's critical role in providing a foundation for a tyranny. Think about this. The question b
770.
by salawat 1y ago
>Which is another way to say that they are currently and knowingly abusing copyright laws, isn't it? Yes. I'd say that is the case.
771.
by salawat 1y ago
I find the belief that we can't manufacture consciousness by accident, and an unwillingness to accept the validity of the concern of not knowing what to do when we do so for fear of spoiling the economic impact of having a grey area to
772.
by salawat 1y ago
>I know, because I'm working on secure embedded video codec hardware, and our customers are targeting this.. Why? Or more specifically, why you, doing that? You can say no, you know. To solve your problem, you're making for som
773.
by salawat 1y ago
So do you think it's okay to record someone else's kids in bathing suits at a lake for watching later? Just trying to connect panoptic recording to something that tends to motivate visceral reactions from people. Not everything
774.
by salawat 1y ago
Ding, ding, ding.
775.
by salawat 1y ago
Seconded.
776.
by salawat 1y ago
Never met him, but the Gentle person's guide to forum spies on cryptome blew open my worldview in terms of expanding my awareness to include the fact that manipulating the apparent through technological means was an organizationally fe
777.
by salawat 1y ago
Considered but that'll probably only happen once I've alternative sources of income lined up that doesn't shackle my IP contributions off hours to my employers, which means bringing in enough to get a couple hours with an att
778.
by salawat 1y ago
My issue stems from the attitudes of the people we're doing it for. I started out doing it for humanity. To bring the bicycle for the mind to everyone. Then one day I woke up and realized the ones paying me were also the ones using it
779.
by salawat 1y ago
My guess is it is meant tongue-in-cheek seeing as it is a way to render into audio all network traffic. The idea being that if you are being targeted by some nefarious, infamous 3 letter agency who has gotten something nefarious running o
780.
by salawat 1y ago
>Hosting a email service isn't rocket science. If ICC can't be bothered to do that for themselves that speaks more to their general incompetence then anything else. I personally found building a rocket in KSP easier than gettin

More ›