Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
salawat
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
28 ms
·
571.
▲
by
salawat
1y ago
Yes. Facebook/Meta was using a locally hosted proxy to get info smuggled back without using routes that are increasingly obstructed by things like ad blockers if I recall correctly. https://securityonline.info/androids-
572.
▲
by
salawat
1y ago
For the uninitiated. https://cryptome.org/2012/07/gent-forum-spies.htm Take it how you will.
573.
▲
by
salawat
1y ago
...No it isn't. It's the heart of the matter. The license plate, combined with cross border surveillance data providers, is enabling dragnet surveillance and enforcement of unconscionable law. Stop trying to play down how tech is
574.
▲
by
salawat
1y ago
Never underestimate how bad things can get. They can always get worse.
575.
▲
by
salawat
1y ago
Stop assuming good faith. This is the same company that acquired Skype and de-P2P'd it at the pressing of the U.S. government to make interception feasible. Microsoft just wants you reliant on them. They can't tap value if you are
576.
▲
by
salawat
1y ago
Ha. You reach for the 2nd but fail to realize that of all the Amendments, there is more legal precedent torture to sidestep that prohibition than any other amendment save maybe the 4th, 5th, and 10th.
577.
▲
by
salawat
1y ago
Trickle down was a far e from the beginning.
578.
▲
by
salawat
1y ago
Truly, this isn't a gateway to any sort ethically sketchy applications. No siree Bob. System Shock 2 vibes intensify
579.
▲
by
salawat
1y ago
Home slice, you are way late to the show. At this point, it's concerted effort to not implement the system keeping it from being realized rather than there being any holes in the technological capability.
580.
▲
by
salawat
1y ago
No it doesn't. We've got so much cruft and deadlock because we've operated in a Madisonian regime. With that cruft comes selective enforcement, and with that both contempt, and loss of legitimacy in the eyes of the populace
581.
▲
by
salawat
1y ago
Originally, Jefferson imagined a state where all acts of legislation came with sunset dates. The idea being that a State would cap out and auto prune itself through the inherent friction of having to reapprove only the most important founda
582.
▲
by
salawat
1y ago
Or just kill the fiscal hoarders who can't conceive of a sustainable closed loop economy where the working class gets a fair shake at living a life. There doesn't have to be billionaires/trillionaires.
583.
▲
by
salawat
1y ago
There's No Time to Explain! https://store.steampowered.com/app/368730/No_Time_To_Explain...
584.
▲
by
salawat
1y ago
Ding ding ding. Got it in one.
585.
▲
by
salawat
1y ago
Now you're getting it. Trust is the overriding problem, and it is a people problem, not a tech one.
586.
▲
by
salawat
1y ago
So... It's your fault? I mean, you wrote it. You had the option to say no. You didn't. Tired of programmers making the world worse and trying to blame everyone but themselves for why the world got shittier.
587.
▲
by
salawat
1y ago
And coincidentally, only one of those is industrially mass produced warranting avoidance and remediation. Even if younglings being younglings, we shouldn't be making deathtrap vehicles optimized for incinerating occupants.
588.
▲
by
salawat
1y ago
When your "enemy" becomes the oversight providing public, we have a major problem. A government with public alignment and maybe a slow leak will be fine. A government without public alignment needs to have every crack pried open u
589.
▲
by
salawat
1y ago
There is a certain point where the infrastructure of access control eclipses the problem space of the thing to be done. No one wants to have to learn LDAP++applied cryptography to set up their jig to do their thing. Now, access control may
590.
▲
by
salawat
1y ago
Fuck around, find out. When governments start throwing around threats, is it any surprise the goodwill dries up?
591.
▲
by
salawat
1y ago
You did nothing from their point of view except waive having them cover the claim, thusly leaving more money on their hands to be managed longer. Your "price discovery" isn't something they aren't aware of. On the contra
592.
▲
by
salawat
1y ago
Medicine not in formulary. Their clinical department decided it was not worth covering for $reasons. The Pharmacy, likely to be considered a preferred pharmacy, signed a contract to be bound by that company's clinical formulary for pol
593.
▲
by
salawat
1y ago
There is no 86. https://guides.loc.gov/federalist-papers/full-text Next time, cite something that actually exists.
594.
▲
by
salawat
1y ago
...what makes you think the sampling process is equipped to detect it? After all, you'd have to get off your ass and go hunt down the actual people in question, and then you might actuallyy get a politically inconvenient picture of the
595.
▲
by
salawat
1y ago
Those families are/were more than happy with the standard of life being raked in by their breadwinner's willingness to make the unilateral decision to indulge in institionally driven statistical murder. So yeah, as one who walked
596.
▲
by
salawat
1y ago
Forgot insurance.
597.
▲
by
salawat
1y ago
Ah, but the family of the canceled policyholders should suffer for losing their mother/sister/daughters? Make decisions to harm others, don't be surprised if it blows back in kind. Golden Rule is there for a reason. Treat oth
598.
▲
by
salawat
1y ago
No. There is a human with their hand on where and where that system cannot go. No one can be trusted with it. Entire tech industry needs to wake up to who their real beneficiaries are and quit while they are ahead before they unleash someth
599.
▲
by
salawat
1y ago
Almost all firearms regulations rests on Wickard v. Filburn, which exploded the reach of the Federal government through the same kinds of assertions on effects on interstate commerce. You might like firearms regulations, but prior to the
600.
▲
by
salawat
1y ago
We threw out the rules before with the Declaration of Independence. Our entire country's founding ethos grew out of the casting down of an established government and the formation of a new one. To be quite frank, there would be nothing
More ›