salawat

28 ms·

481.
by salawat 10mo ago
They can do essentially the same thing by freezing wages and waiting. Hospitality sector needs to unionize, and until we start seeing the multiplier between line working staff and execs come down, we need to keep the pressure on.
482.
by salawat 10mo ago
So, you helped with this... Why?
483.
by salawat 10mo ago
Soooo.... Why did you build it for them? You didn't have to further enable it. Despise people who just drop this kind of thing without any hint of repentance or contrition.
484.
by salawat 10mo ago
DoJ, despite the name, is not part of the judiciary of the United States. It's firmly in the Executive branch. The U.S. Judiciary is quite literally only the Courts and their staff . Anyone with a badge, or arrest powers above the Ave
485.
by salawat 11mo ago
The issue is there is no non-custodial option by definition . You are either doing what a financial institution has to do by law (Full compliance system), or you're outsourcing to someone else who does, in which case you haven't
486.
by salawat 11mo ago
I'm just shocked people aren't clueing into the fact that tech companies are trying to build developer dependence on these things to secure a "rent" revenue stream. But hey, what do I know. It's just cloud hyper sca
487.
by salawat 11mo ago
Forget it. DoA due to Bank Secrecy Act, compliance costs (AML/KYC), money transmitter licensure, and the fundamental structure of the U.S. financial system You could make a self-hostable solution, but the rest of the financial network
488.
by salawat 11mo ago
Given this admin? Yes.
489.
by salawat 11mo ago
This isn't a court of law. This is real life, bucko. You don't operate for your own protection on the good faith you think the rest of the world has for you, you plan on capabilities. What you call baseless, is you screaming into
490.
by salawat 11mo ago
And I'm telling you that what you're asking for doesn't mean a lick. Someone already pissed in the pool. Once you know it's been done, you can't uncrack that egg. Plan on capabilities. Not "what you feel like
491.
by salawat 11mo ago
In the U.S. capital got sympathy striking illegalized as part of the Taft-Hartley Act around WWII, because labor exploiting network effects was just to unconscionable for the time.
492.
by salawat 11mo ago
So you walk in to negotiate with your capitalist overlords with an equivalent number of lawyers that they can field? Oh, they don't pay you enough to do that? Oh, you need to be working while doing this? Oh, you just got replaced becau
493.
by salawat 11mo ago
Forming a corporation is a power grab by capitalists. Doesn't mean the labor force has to entertain or facilitate their delusions of grandeur.
494.
by salawat 11mo ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-Tech_Employee_Antitrust_L... For the uninitiated.
495.
by salawat 11mo ago
Doesn't need it to justify unionizing. Unionizing is a right, and it was previously not exercised because there was no evidence of the will of the market to defraud or conspire against workers . It is now written plain for all to see
496.
by salawat 11mo ago
Oh, yes, because we've never seen a case where large companies entered into no poach agreements to suppress worker wages, right? Oh wait... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-Tech_Employee_Antitrust_L... Quit the
497.
by salawat 11mo ago
>You cannot respond to your entire gamedev team refusing to work other than by replacing them or by getting them to stop striking. Funny thing. Pay people fairly and don't abuse them, and they don't strike. If they are striking
498.
by salawat 11mo ago
Absolutely not. Perverse incentives, ho!!! Not paying you for a chance to be alienated from my own damn labor.
499.
by salawat 11mo ago
The original detention was politically motivated, and completely violated all semblance of due process. I can forgive the court for dipping their toes into the political pool this once to remedy and send a message to the executive that this
500.
by salawat 11mo ago
Look, I've gotten cartel beheadings and beatings on a YouTube search query for Jack Russell terriers. Don't throw shade. If you haven't gotten "How the fuck did that get there?", consider yourself lucky I guess. Bes
501.
by salawat 11mo ago
Note: this article focuses on women, but many of the experiences are also shared by men in slightly differently emphasized forms. This is basically a physical manifestation of Jung's process of individuation. Feel free to look it up.
502.
by salawat 11mo ago
No Stasi. No Salem witch trials. Thank you. Do not need to retread that ground.
503.
by salawat 11mo ago
No. What is this revisionist nonsense? Where the hell did you think the meme of "On the Internet, no one knows you're a dog" came from? Conventional wisdom was alias up, or maintain a well-known handle. Do not use or share pe
504.
by salawat 11mo ago
>Slippery-slope arguments, Slippery slope arguments exist because the act of governing has the tendency to converge on ratchet effects. It never bloody loosens, do every damn inch has to be treated with maximal resistance.
505.
by salawat 11mo ago
GlobalSign vs self-signed cert being used for code signing makes not one lick of difference though? You can't use any public cert alone to forge an update, unless you're trying to sell us on the Notepad++ author having source cont
506.
by salawat 11mo ago
Yepper. Trail of Tears, German/Japanese internment are all primary education topics. Now interestingly, I don't think Bush has made it into the history books yet, but I don't have kids, so can't verify current day educat
507.
by salawat 11mo ago
It is for the ones capturing the regulatory apparatus.
508.
by salawat 11mo ago
The Internet doesn't tend toward nihilism, and anonymous accounts have no real influence on the level of relative nihilism. Humanity, and it's refusal to get it's shit straight caused a catharsis of nihilistic sentiment throu
509.
by salawat 11mo ago
Netflix and those involved hasn't conclusively metamorphosed into a Larry Ellison-esque state of Lawn Moweriness. Make no mistake, it (Netflix) is still a billionaire corp; on the humanity scale, it scores quite low, but not lawn mowe
510.
by salawat 11mo ago
Economics 101 also notes that your view is still quite lacking, as the Baumol effect is far from being settled as 100% the bloody cause, as there is significant non-supply side effects that may account for shifts from the progressive sector

More ›