salamander014

10 ms·

61.
by salamander014 7y ago
Paying for ACCESS makes sense. It costs the ISP to have the availability to connect you up. Paying for USAGE is disgusting. The way a network works, is that besides upkeep which is a small percentage of TCO, upfront cost scales with total b
62.
by salamander014 7y ago
This is a better analogy, but still not quite right. This issue constantly comes up with keeping the internet free and open. Take the following: The customer pays for their connection, say 10mbps over Verizon's network. Under a free an
63.
by salamander014 7y ago
Also, a true Data-Warehouse has it's data frozen on a set recurring schedule, say every hour or every 24 hours. This is so that users running related jobs at different times throughout the day see the same results and are working with
64.
by salamander014 7y ago
If these apps get banned because they use poor dependencies, maybe better dependencies will become popular, and developers will also have a reason to be more aware of what code they are using.
65.
by salamander014 7y ago
Are there wing designs that encompass strong dihedral characteristics?
66.
by salamander014 7y ago
Their Music app versus Spotify, their Photos app versus Google Photos, their News app versus NPR... And that's not everything.
67.
by salamander014 8y ago
The whole point of doing microservices is so that you can split up processing responsibility boundaries reasonably, and each team is responsible for being an "expert" in the service it's responsible for. This also means that
68.
by salamander014 8y ago
Plug for a related tool that I use constantly. It's called Swiss Army Knife for SMTP, or "SWAKS" for short. http://www.jetmore.org/john/code/swaks/ This tool is one of the best tools I've