sahaj

11 ms·

61.
by sahaj 15y ago
I won't elaborate too much on this point because it's been made many times here in the past, but I'm pretty sure you don't understand G+ if you think G+ is a short sighted move to combat just Facebook.
62.
Shipping the Google in Google+(googleblog.blogspot.com)
37 points by sahaj 15y ago|26 comments
63.
by sahaj 15y ago
As the current top comment notes: You click the "Share..." button on the G+ (black)bar.
64.
by sahaj 15y ago
Anyone notice that Sergey uses the word "Apps" in the video. I find it incredible when people claim that Apple introduced the word App, and therefore the trademark "App Store" is valid. So glad that was squared away during the Amazon suit
65.
by sahaj 15y ago
Android still largely looks like that on a candybar design phones: http://cdn.precentral.net/resources/images/000/017/719/origi...
66.
by sahaj 15y ago
I feel that Facebook is starting to look more like an email client than Gmail looking more like Facebook.
67.
by sahaj 15y ago
I actually cried when I read this. RIP Steve!
68.
by sahaj 15y ago
Why is this comment not at the top. They need to define what "unlimited" really means.
69.
by sahaj 15y ago
If it was $15/GB, I would be happy. AT&T charges $15/200MB.
70.
by sahaj 15y ago
From what I understand Windows volume licensing cost is around $30-$40 per copy depending on who the hardware vendor is.
71.
by sahaj 15y ago
they did announce the people widget. i'm hoping they've thought about this.
72.
by sahaj 15y ago
did you check the price? it's around ~60USD.
73.
by sahaj 15y ago
Probably not. I use Buzz quite a bit and noticed that more of my contacts are using G+ than they did Buzz.
74.
by sahaj 15y ago
I'm a Cal Poly grad and this excites me. Congrats guys!
75.
Try Blogger's New Interface(draft.blogger.com)
68 points by sahaj 15y ago|32 comments
76.
by sahaj 15y ago
Not saying it warrants a visit from the SS, but if I were Apple I would be concerned too. Some people could potentially distrust Apple stores because of this which would result in loss of business.
77.
by sahaj 15y ago
It is the way it is because of a reason, and HN folk are clever enough to spot it.
78.
by sahaj 15y ago
If they can nail the group video conf & google voice integration, I think they have a winner and people will move over just to use this feature.
79.
by sahaj 15y ago
Sac is a good place to bike? Better than SC? You've got to be kidding me. Davis - now that's a great place for biking.
80.
by sahaj 15y ago
They should've integrated it into gMail like they did with Buzz and gVoice.
81.
by sahaj 15y ago
I honestly thought it was a cool new feature of gMail where I can get reminders about calling people that is tied into gCal.
82.
by sahaj 15y ago
I got mine a few days ago from Gilt.com Things I like: Fast. Amazing battery life. Good trackpad. Chrome! Nice keyboard. Light weight. Things I don't like: It stutters sometimes with flash objects. Display only opens at abo
83.
by sahaj 15y ago
Two questions come to my mind: Is this agreement still valid? And would either MSFT and/or NVDA live up to it in case of a NVDA buyout in the future?
84.
by sahaj 15y ago
But... I will say that I would be encouraged if I were a shareholder by this Why else would a CEO say anything different? I've been through an IPO and basically heard the same thing from the CEO.
85.
by sahaj 15y ago
Imagine for a second that Google did buy Sprint and then brought it up to speed as far as wireless coverage that matches ATT/VZ while offering the best in class service for the price. Masses move over to Sprint in a few years. Sprint becom
86.
by sahaj 15y ago
Google looking for revenue sources beyond advertising. Naw. They are hoping that instead of spending your time behind the wheel, you will be spending it on the internet watching some Google ads. /s
87.
by sahaj 15y ago
Does Facebook have $3-4B in cash? I didn't think they had that much money. And even if they do, they wouldn't have much left after the deal to move other big plans forward. I guess if they go public first, then it could happen.
88.
by sahaj 16y ago
If the website you are visiting also integrates +1, then there is no need to go back and +1. But yeah, going back to the Google search results page is a pain and I doubt very many people would actually take that action, unless they are real
89.
by sahaj 16y ago
If none of the 4chan users are my friends, I won't see anything from them. I think this is actually not a problem.
90.
by sahaj 16y ago
This seems like a defensive move on Google's part. I imagine there are talks inside Facebook to either develop their own search or work with another search provider to integrate Facebook into the results. I am not sure how widely this fea

More ›