sahaj

36 ms·

361.
by sahaj 18y ago
by that logic, the other guys were right too, because most stocks were on their 52week high in march 2008.
362.
by sahaj 18y ago
from how many people though? i'm willing to bet not that many.
363.
by sahaj 18y ago
too expensive for how much money it brings in. plus, it doesn't add anything to the google experience. does twitter hold any patents? i read a while back that software patents don't apply unless they are somehow linked to hardware.
364.
by sahaj 18y ago
he's wrong as well. he said gold will go up to 1k/oz, but actually metals have gone down tremendously. with the economy slowing down, industry around the world has slowed down, and the dollar has regained value. now, i don't think the do
365.
by sahaj 18y ago
this is a popular position to take now that the big G has fallen below $300. until you can tell me what the <viable> alternative is, ads aren't going anywhere.
366.
by sahaj 18y ago
you are kidding, right?
367.
by sahaj 18y ago
reading the title, i thought, oh cool, this will tell me which investment firm(s) are buying/selling a particular stock. as others have pointed out, this doesn't provide anything more than what google finance already does.
368.
by sahaj 18y ago
i don't think the tourists have gone home: i think they ran out of money. you say tomato, i say potato. did i say the community was not useful or that it didn't want serious conversation?
369.
by sahaj 18y ago
the startup party is over. i really doubt HN will take off. but then again, most people here don't want that anyway.
370.
by sahaj 18y ago
just get a really fast proc with a lot of mem, and you won't have to worry about shit.