saghul

15 ms·

1. 121.▲
   by saghul 6y ago

   It is our belief that by doing this we'll also be helping adoption. If a browser vendor (any of them) propoes an API, but nobody uses it, why would the rest care to implement it? The ability to do E2EE is kind of a big deal, even thoug
2. 122.▲
   by saghul 6y ago

   We’ve kept the entire packet header unencrypted so the effect is more visible. The final implementation will just leave the minimum required bytes (1 or 2) of the header unencrypted.
3. 123.▲
   by saghul 7y ago

   We don't have a way to turn these on from the UI, but here is how you can disable all audio processing: https://meet.jit.si/YourRoonNameHere#config.disableAP=true
4. 124.▲
   by saghul 7y ago

   Jitsi will use up to 2.5Mbps for the user "on stage" (the large view) and about 200Kbps for each thumbnail. You can use these numbers and your usual conference size to calculate how much data you'd use and then calculate the
5. 125.▲
   by saghul 7y ago

   It should work fine, since it would create a virtual webcam. Please drop by https://github.com/jitsi/jitsi-meet/issues/5425 if you run into issues.
6. 126.▲
   by saghul 7y ago

   I didn't choose it at random ;-)
7. 127.▲
   by saghul 7y ago

   Hey there, saghul from Jitsi here. Have you reported that to us? I have deployed several self-hosste instances with Lets Enccrypt and haven't seen this, but there might a bug lurking somewhere.
8. 128.▲
   by saghul 7y ago

   Yes, you can deploy Jigasi ( https://github.com/jitsi/jigasi ) to VoIP access to Jitsi Meet.
9. 129.▲
   by saghul 7y ago

   Good work! You may whant to set this override on the iframe API: https://github.com/jitsi/jitsi-meet/blob/master/interface_co...
10. 130.▲
    by saghul 7y ago

    If you had 4 people the video was going trhough the JVB for sure. Since a Jitsi Meet installation uses multiple components, maybe you didn't shut them all? Video shenanigans can be a dark art, but not that magical ;-)
11. 131.▲
    by saghul 7y ago

    We use a technique called simulcast. It consists on making every participant "work a bit harder" for the good of the bunch. That is, every participant sends 3 separate video resolutions to the server: 720p, 480p and 180p (this ma
12. 132.▲
    by saghul 7y ago

    Correct.
13. 133.▲
    by saghul 7y ago

    The videobridge receives all streams from all participants and forwards the appropriate ones to the other participants.
14. 134.▲
    by saghul 7y ago

    We are working on this right this instant. Expect updates soon!
15. 135.▲
    by saghul 7y ago

    They are completely different projects. Jitsi (desktop) was a multi-protocol desktop client whicch supported SIP, XMPP, IRC, etc. At one point in time it gained the hability to do multi-party video conferencing, where one participant would
16. 136.▲
    by saghul 7y ago

    Note that this article is about the legacy Jitsi desktop application, and NOT about Jitsi Meet, the WebRTC compatible video conferencing project. Source: I'm a Jitsi dev.
17. 137.▲
    by saghul 7y ago

    Most of the Jitsi devs are employed by 8x8, which offers a service based on it: https://8x8.vc and it also integrates it in Virtual Office, it's core product. Disclaimer: I work for 8x8.
18. 138.▲
    by saghul 7y ago

    At least on iOS the heavy lifting seems to be done by the TwilioVideo library: https://github.com/twilio/twilio-video-app-ios/blob/c9d5410b... ... which is not Open Source: https://cocoapods.org&#x
19. 139.▲
    by saghul 7y ago

    We are making progress at making our support for Firefox on par with Chrome again. This is bound to be complete soon!
20. 140.▲
    by saghul 7y ago

    Hey there, any chance you remember when you tested this? We have recently fixed a number of problems with screen-sharing indeed!
21. 141.▲
    by saghul 7y ago

    Hey there, Jitsi dev here. Great questions, let me try to clarify. Jitsi is now owned by 8x8, which has a clear business model. We recently launched 8x8 Meetings, which is a rebranded Jitsi Meet with a few extra bells and whistles. We (Jits
22. 142.▲
    by saghul 7y ago

    Hey there, Jitsi dev here. Yes, that is correct (except the Atlassian bit, we are owned by 8x8 now). Currently WebRTC does not provide the necessary tools to make E2EE possible while still being able to use smart video routing techniques su
23. 143.▲
    by saghul 7y ago

    I've been working 32 hour weeks ever since my daughter was born 2 years ago. Mondays are my day off, we go to music classes, walk on the park and just spend time together. On tuesdays I'm "hungry" when I go back to work.
24. 144.▲
    by saghul 7y ago

    There is an ongoing effort to bring it into libuv: https://github.com/libuv/libuv/pull/2322 Looks like using liburing might be the way to go, since it's MIT licensed.
25. 145.▲
    by saghul 7y ago

    They bought the IP, not the product.
26. 146.▲
    by saghul 7y ago

    Also free for open source projects: https://www.jetbrains.com/opensource/ I've applied and got one in the past. Can recommend!
27. 147.▲
    by saghul 7y ago

    > To give you an idea what we are doing; an React Native app that sell and connect a very specific type of workshops with costumers over custom WebRTC Video chat(fork of React Native-based Jitsi Meet). What I can tell, I haven't see
28. 148.▲
    by saghul 7y ago

    Is it ready for prime time? IIRC it has only been around for the last couple of releases which makes me worry a bit.
29. 149.▲
    by saghul 7y ago

    Never heard of [1] before. Impressive stuff.
30. 150.▲
    by saghul 7y ago

    Ah, didn't know that, TIL!