saghm

16 ms·

331.
by saghm 2mo ago
We all are, some of us just cycle it out more often
332.
by saghm 2mo ago
I don't drink at all, and I honestly don't go out very much ever (including back them, probably very much related to the not drinking thing), so I wasn't consistently having the same thing to eat over the weekend. Interesting
333.
by saghm 2mo ago
> I thhink he was way more broke than I realized. I grew up broke too, but I also had my eyes set on improving my situation. Was kind of a wake-up-moment that most people around me had minimal ambition about this. I feel like I'm mi
334.
by saghm 2mo ago
That's wild, my frequency has remained pretty consistent through my life, although I did have a couple years where somehow one of the days each week I'd do it would always be Monday, and I never had any explanation for why that wa
335.
by saghm 2mo ago
Sounds like I'm still in the range then! Interesting that it varies so much. I've heard some people say (or I guess imply) that they do it daily, and it's so different from my experience that I've always wondered which w
336.
by saghm 2mo ago
It might also have to do with how long someone tends to take. I tend to have a pretty slow metabolism and only need to defecate a couple times a week (to preempt any armchair diagnoses from people who think this is weirdly infrequent, every
337.
by saghm 2mo ago
If you're not already aware that two different descriptors can both accurately describe something even if they're not synonyms, I'm not sure how to help you. What I originally said was accurate, and no amount of other accurat
338.
by saghm 2mo ago
Not sure how common this understanding of the terms is, but to me, those terms don't seem conflicting.
339.
by saghm 2mo ago
I guess that depends on whether you think the motivations matter. When it comes to a policy on a hot-button issue that seems like it could easily be enforced selectively, I don't think it's a stretch to be concerned about whether
340.
by saghm 2mo ago
Probably it would get picked up by someone else (e.g. the Linux Foundation)? It's GPLv2-licensed, so it's not like the code is going to be risky for someone to fork
341.
by saghm 2mo ago
> given past scars around Java and copyright How many of these were self-inflicted?
342.
by saghm 2mo ago
What? If boomers and genx weren't interested in starting families, where did the generations after them come from?
343.
by saghm 2mo ago
I'm pretty certain that my data would be leaked regardless of him, so as far as objectionable businesses go, his is pretty low on my list of ones to be upset about
344.
by saghm 2mo ago
I don't understand this logic. If I was uncomfortable using the entire width of my monitor, I would have gotten a smaller monitor instead. I find moving my eyes less annoying than moving my fingers to scroll; I often don't even re
345.
by saghm 2mo ago
You're literally describing your own subjective experience. I can move my eyes all the way to each side of my screen with my neck stationary, and I don't feel strained. "Subjective" doesn't mean I'm saying you&
346.
by saghm 2mo ago
They're both kernels, one of them just happens to actually be useful
347.
by saghm 2mo ago
Not sure if it was added later, but there's an even more obvious sign: the top of the blog post literally says that an LLM was used to write it.
348.
by saghm 2mo ago
I've never run into another website using so little of my horizontal space before though, so I'm struggling to understand why this one is an outlier for me based on that explanation alone.
349.
by saghm 2mo ago
"Don't flock camera me bro"
350.
by saghm 2mo ago
The Flock camera network is much less of a stickler for those pesky civil liberties being respected
351.
by saghm 2mo ago
Honestly getting arrested would be lucky. If recent years have shown anything, they don't need to be particularly concerned about removing you from the picture more permanently regardless of the circumstances.
352.
by saghm 2mo ago
I've definitely never seen a newspaper that left over half of the page blank.
353.
by saghm 2mo ago
> It would just be hard to read because of long lines, shorter lines are more comfortable That's a pretty subjective view, and one at odds with literally every other website I can think of
354.
by saghm 2mo ago
It also seems kinda tone deaf. If someone basically told me I was wasting my time and asked what I would do in the future, I would not bother giving them a particularly thoughtful answer because trying to spend effort justifying my life cho
355.
by saghm 2mo ago
I'm confused about why this website is using less than half of my window for content. I understand wanting some margins, but a third of my window on each side seems pretty egregious. At least it's centered though!
356.
by saghm 2mo ago
The article only seems to very briefly mention the vertical axis, with pretty much all of it focusing on interactions with the sidebar (which only affects the horizontal width).
357.
by saghm 2mo ago
I mean, what would stop someone from registering mycloudflare.pay and doing the same thing? Having the link in the other direction seems like what matters more
358.
by saghm 2mo ago
If a malicious site gets your password, I'm not sure why it matters whether it happened in the frontend or not.
359.
by saghm 2mo ago
That's a problem that should be solved then, because literally everyone loses when it's done this way
360.
by saghm 2mo ago
Oh good, I'm glad that Cloudflare, proud defender of internet security, is properly focused on the important goal of optimizing for their ability to send promotional emails to my inbox rather than silly things like helping prevent phis

More ›