Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
sachinjain
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
31.
▲
by
sachinjain
4y ago
Imagine if StackOverflow announcing a subscription of $10/month to access the accepted answer, all the devs out there will be screwed.
32.
▲
by
sachinjain
4y ago
This isn't backed by any data but I feel confident to say there are so many questions on SO that can be answered by Chat-GPT correctly. If you open the home page of StackOverflow and see the new questions coming in topics like Python,
33.
▲
Stackoverflow updates its policy to not accept answers copy-pasted from GPT
1 points
by
sachinjain
4y ago
|
2 comments
34.
▲
by
sachinjain
4y ago
Do you use any tool like Browserstack or Lambdatest or Saucelabs for running your tests across browsers? My question is if you have already invested in end to end testing automation then why not run in 10 browsers to be on safe side than ru
35.
▲
by
sachinjain
4y ago
I have had a very nasty bug that I debugged in Safari. Chrome & Firefox supports redirects to http when the site is on localhost or 127.x.x.x but Safari doesn't and throws a Mixed content warning error. Another one was similar when
36.
▲
by
sachinjain
4y ago
Fixing any issue specific on Safari is a whole challenge on another level. Hope you had an easy time debugging issues on Safari.
37.
▲
by
sachinjain
4y ago
Hey @raxxorraxor, I am not against using jQuery. What I meant was initially back in 2012-2013 days when jQuery used to be a default DOM query/manipulation library people used, the same code used to break across browsers and we had to u
38.
▲
by
sachinjain
4y ago
We might be wrong here and missing some valid point. I see companies doing automation testing beyond a point but do they really test beyond 2 browsers? One line of thought could be if we have already invested in automation testing then why
39.
▲
Ask HN: How relevant is cross-browser testing anymore?
42 points
by
sachinjain
4y ago
|
93 comments
40.
▲
Regulations on Custom Browsers made for work, productivity, etc.
4 points
by
sachinjain
4y ago
|
2 comments
41.
▲
by
sachinjain
4y ago
This is very powerful, thanks for sharing this.
42.
▲
by
sachinjain
4y ago
> This information is valuable in ensuring security and providing insights related to usage. My question is not about ip-api or ipinfo products but my question & concern is why does UberSuggestion collect this information from my dev
43.
▲
by
sachinjain
4y ago
Its not ip-api that's capturing the data. It is UberSuggest content script that is firing this API call and capturing this data.
44.
▲
UberSuggest Chrome Extension tracks your location data extensively
5 points
by
sachinjain
4y ago
|
6 comments
45.
▲
by
sachinjain
4y ago
I bet this is going to be very helpful especially user interviews. I have done lots of user interviews lately and I spent a lot of time collecting notes for different things the users said, asked for and then processing the action items. Th
46.
▲
by
sachinjain
5y ago
We have just started working on adding websocket. gRPC and rpc-json are in the pipeline.
47.
▲
by
sachinjain
5y ago
FYI - We are adding a support for responseJSON in the arguments so you can just write the above code like this function modifyResponse(args) { const {method, url, response, responseType, requestHeaders, requestData, responseJSON} = args
48.
▲
by
sachinjain
5y ago
Very Interesting that you brought K8s. In the K8s cluster, an API request could be hitting one of the multiple PODs so how does the JVMTI agent know which pod to connect to? I am definitely missing something here.
49.
▲
by
sachinjain
5y ago
Interesting! What was the trigger point to move to Proxyman. How did you port the configurations you already had in Charles? Did you have to recreate them?
50.
▲
by
sachinjain
5y ago
So humble of you. Drop me an email at sachin@requestly.io if you want to chat further and if there's anything I can help you with.
51.
▲
by
sachinjain
5y ago
So glad to hear this.
52.
▲
by
sachinjain
5y ago
wow thanks! I believe Requestly is ChromeDevTools++ and Our vision is to make MobileDevTools++ and BackendDevTools++ really soon.
53.
▲
by
sachinjain
5y ago
great collection. You can also create a Github awesome repo collection like awesome-requests-proxy-tools
54.
▲
by
sachinjain
5y ago
Zap and burp are more optimized towards security testing. There's definitely some overlap in terms of network requests interception but the capabilities on top of interception varies a lot So It depends upon your use case. If you are a
55.
▲
by
sachinjain
5y ago
thanks for the tip. AB test on pricing page is very tricky. One challenge which with the A/B test on pricing page is that we need to wait for like weeks to get substantial data in terms of conversions. For example - 40 vs 32 wouldn
56.
▲
by
sachinjain
5y ago
That's a very good question. Manifest V3 changes heavily impact Requestly because we use webRequest API to intercept the network requests. We have already started evaluating what works and what not. A couple of things which I see right
57.
▲
by
sachinjain
5y ago
Yes, You can do this with Requestly desktop app. You can use Modify Response feature to just specify a URL then specify the status code you need like 400 or 500 and then you can also specify what content do you want to return. Requestly als
58.
▲
by
sachinjain
5y ago
I have seen Inav earlier but never used it. Does it also provide response modification capabilities?
59.
▲
by
sachinjain
5y ago
Some of our customers use Requestly on Windows & Mac to test their sites and that too across browsers. I am glad that there's more demand for a universal solution. We are based on top of electron So it was comparatively easier to b
60.
▲
by
sachinjain
5y ago
Lightrun looks really interesting. Have you personally used lightrun to debug anything directly in production? I saw the video on landing page and very curious to know how it works under the hood.
More ›