sabas123

8 ms·

61.
by sabas123 5y ago
You can apply the same argument for letting the west boots on the ground. All loss of live in this conflict is tragic, no way to deny that. But a no-fly zone is not an option here.
62.
by sabas123 5y ago
How are these things not a civilization ending threat? Nukes can literally kill everything and global warming, if unchecked, will probably do the same long term.
63.
by sabas123 5y ago
Without knowing any statistics on the demographic of HN, I would assume that it really isn't that diverse speaking from a cultural ground, but rather that we have a place that accepts disagreement a lot (or at least doesn't punish
64.
by sabas123 5y ago
They are not against all encryption though.
65.
by sabas123 5y ago
Side note, looking at patents to identify #breakthroughs doesn't really work as 1. It requires quite a large investment which disfavors smaller institutions 2. The distribution of patents that actually make money is so incredibly skewe
66.
by sabas123 5y ago
> 12. Apply the Blink test I can’t recall a client buying an over-explained idea. People either get it and want it or or they aren’t and they don’t. Within seconds. Make a fast impact. Is this true? I agree with the rest of the advice bu
67.
by sabas123 5y ago
> You can sell your copy, no matter what you have done to it, at least by the First Sale Doctrine in the US, and similar elsewhere. If you have a personal created copy of a copyrighted product which you do not have the rights to, you don
68.
by sabas123 5y ago
This example actually popped up in my Patent class. This is what I remembered. You are allowed to create a copy (and thus also in printed form) of copyrighted material, _only_ for private and personal use. i.e you _must_ recreate it yoursel
69.
by sabas123 5y ago
FAANG needs to die as an acronym.
70.
by sabas123 5y ago
> The cases that make the news with 100 million dollar fines to trillion dollar companies are just the ones in which the prosecution can't even reach someone at the company cause 100 million dollars is a drop in the bucket not worth
71.
by sabas123 5y ago
I don't get why most of the critique seems to revolve around memorization. In my (small amount of) experience with LC they seem quite close to regular algorithms exercises. All of which relate to the theory that I got at my algorithms
72.
by sabas123 5y ago
Yet one should be very skeptical about such claims. We don't know the parameters what they are optimizing for so how can we even asses it's performance related to those?
73.
by sabas123 5y ago
With the exception of terse definitions, my comprehension speed of fast spoken word is MUCH better then reading. But I'm probably an outlier in this regard.
74.
by sabas123 5y ago
Much better :)
75.
by sabas123 5y ago
Reading the conclusion of the article (not the paper), it sounds like the difference in writing between genders seem to be too strong for current techniques to work.
76.
by sabas123 5y ago
And that Atom processor has way inferior security than current day processors (also less attack vectors so who knows). Although what's in the OP doesn't seem to worry me that much, if it were as disastrous as others commenters sug
77.
by sabas123 5y ago
It could also help prevent unwanted communication between the students and the outside world (or between themselves).
78.
by sabas123 5y ago
I agree with hermitwriter here. Currently I'm not at all convinced somebody can claim that all of these negative effects wouldn't have existed if we had a morally correct social media platform instead.
79.
by sabas123 5y ago
If we assume that "evilness" or what ever metric we use to shame FB employees is transitive, is it really possible to work in a way that is significantly better?
80.
by sabas123 5y ago
Just like any other hobby
81.
by sabas123 5y ago
I think if you start from a point where you need to know all the registers beforehand you already lost. I like x64 a lot more because IMO it allows you a few important memory related ones in x86 making life a lot simpler.
82.
by sabas123 5y ago
Depending on what you're after there is a lot more than 2000 pages of documentation :) That said, the C standard is also an impenetrable mess, yet people can start using it without resorting to it.
83.
by sabas123 5y ago
This is a really good question! Basically a lot of properties that you probably can think of that could be checked for but aren't expressible in Java types system can still be expressed using types in another system. Therefore if you w
84.
by sabas123 5y ago
Optiver works in a vastly different and super tiny sector (in employee count) which is renowned for having higher salaries than any other sector (including tech) and is a massive outlier.
85.
by sabas123 5y ago
And with a little bit more force they beat the password out of me anyway regardless which system I use...
86.
by sabas123 5y ago
> Does this even need a study? Isn’t it simply obvious? There are "obvious" and "trivially true" things in science that turned out to be false. While it might be easy for certain engineers to accept, there is real val
87.
by sabas123 5y ago
The chance you're pwn'd is really unlike as generating these kinds of binaries are nearly impossible.
88.
by sabas123 5y ago
Except that these latest findings are actually undocumented instead of known debug instructions (albeit still technically impressive)
89.
by sabas123 5y ago
Regular compilers also deal with this now as well. They try to avoid generating an ENDBR as an argument when possible IIRC.
90.
by sabas123 5y ago
They have been reverse engineering Atom for over half a decade (possibly longer) now.

More ›