Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
saagarjha
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
3 ms
·
31.
▲
by
saagarjha
25d ago
Judging by this entire page being the direct output of an LLM with little editing done at all I assume the feature is probably half baked and probably just a bunch of skills or harness tweaks? In that case, why would anyone pay for this at
32.
▲
by
saagarjha
27d ago
> I've run into the iOS keyboard only using 80% of the width of the phone (all the keys smaller). Are you sure you're not triggering the compact width keyboard?
33.
▲
by
saagarjha
28d ago
I don't really think it is a super accurate performance simulator
34.
▲
by
saagarjha
1mo ago
Obviously he's not going to call his own code unmaintainable, but he's basically against abstractions which let people write software that needs to survive past a frame. BTW I have found that LLMs are kind of bad at doing refactor
35.
▲
by
saagarjha
1mo ago
Apple is in talks to fab their new chips with Intel. You are very wrong in how their microarchitecture is developed.
36.
▲
by
saagarjha
1mo ago
You can usually do the same for macOS and from a single place to boot
37.
▲
by
saagarjha
1mo ago
My problem with Casey is that he is not a performance engineer, he is a performance maximalist. Software is a set of tradeoffs. If he truly cared about performance, the best thing for him to do would be to write clean code that had good per
38.
▲
by
saagarjha
1mo ago
David is upset that Pixel is not patching fast enough.
39.
▲
by
saagarjha
1mo ago
My claim is that there is quite a bit stopping Safari from using Rust ;)
40.
▲
by
saagarjha
1mo ago
No, you're reading what you want out of my comment. The context of this thread was very clearly browser support of JPEG XL, not your apps.
41.
▲
by
saagarjha
1mo ago
Just because it is possible or even easy does not mean it will happen.
42.
▲
by
saagarjha
1mo ago
You’re not shipping code as part of Safari
43.
▲
by
saagarjha
1mo ago
Shipping unsafe C++ is easier on Apple platforms than Rust. This seems unlikely to change anytime soon.
44.
▲
by
saagarjha
1mo ago
https://xkcd.com/951/
45.
▲
by
saagarjha
1mo ago
I don’t think this is public?
46.
▲
by
saagarjha
1mo ago
You’re missing the factor for intelligence/token.
47.
▲
by
saagarjha
1mo ago
It's more like I report a crime and the cops don't do anything about it, a situation in which I feel fairly justified being upset?
48.
▲
by
saagarjha
1mo ago
Because I use it and pay them money for that?
49.
▲
by
saagarjha
1mo ago
The problem is bad things being created.
50.
▲
by
saagarjha
1mo ago
Bluesky didn't have to use this API for this purpose.
51.
▲
by
saagarjha
1mo ago
To what end?
52.
▲
by
saagarjha
1mo ago
His way of explaining things clearly seems to have done so
53.
▲
by
saagarjha
1mo ago
> He does such a fantastic job of explaining his work. He did a fantastic job of explaining his work.
54.
▲
by
saagarjha
1mo ago
Script kiddies are just going to paste this into Claude and have it explain it to them.
55.
▲
by
saagarjha
2mo ago
Why is it amazing?
56.
▲
by
saagarjha
2mo ago
> Interior Secretary Doug Burgum said in a statement posted on X that Americans deserve an energy system built on common sense and not one dependent on "costly subsidies". I agree. This is why we are building offshore wind and
57.
▲
by
saagarjha
2mo ago
"I don't see bots on Twitter anymore" "I keep seeing LLM content all the time" How is one of these a "lower effort opinion"?
58.
▲
by
saagarjha
2mo ago
I guess he decided he had ruined the platform enough. Before he joined X had already implemented the login wall stuff that only let you view a single post, by the time he left it would show a tapping animation trying to beg you to install t
59.
▲
by
saagarjha
2mo ago
Yes, I would imagine so. I don't think the result would look exactly like what it does now since needs have changed, but I can imagine that they could do it.
60.
▲
by
saagarjha
2mo ago
This does not answer my question.
More ›