Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
s73ver_
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
37 ms
·
301.
▲
by
s73ver_
9y ago
The main reason people flock to the Bay Area is because of the growth in the Tech industry. However, as we all know, there is very, very little technical reason that has to be there, or could not be spread out. The only reason really is the
302.
▲
by
s73ver_
9y ago
Suppose someone sells their home grown produce to supplement their income. Now, the neighboring plot is interfering with their ability to do that.
303.
▲
by
s73ver_
9y ago
Does that plot have a legal right to control what happens on your plot? Cause that is what's going on here: they would interfere with the other person's plot.
304.
▲
by
s73ver_
9y ago
There's room for everyone in the country as a whole. Hell, there's room for everyone who currently lives in California in California as a whole. The problem is that too many people want to live in certain smaller parts.
305.
▲
by
s73ver_
9y ago
And every startup would again be having to worry about patent trolls. Patent rights have not diminished one bit. What has diminished is the ability of patent trolls to abuse the patent system, and more review allowing for patents that shoul
306.
▲
by
s73ver_
9y ago
I don't see this as being too terrible. Hopefully it causes companies to focus more on selling things to customers, instead of just "growth hacking" to get more users that don't actually contribute to the bottom line.
307.
▲
by
s73ver_
9y ago
Why do they need their own server? What's wrong with Dropbox, Google Drive, et al? Or, what's wrong with the network drives from Seagate and WD that will let you access those files remotely (aside from the fact that they do cost m
308.
▲
by
s73ver_
9y ago
"edit: regarding the Mt. Gox situation. You present it as something that should have never happened in civilized society, but I think it's growing pains on the way to something better." But they're growing pains that don
309.
▲
by
s73ver_
9y ago
No. To the US Government, there is no other currency than the dollar. If you are a US Citizen, and working in the US, then you are using US Dollars. Everything else would be an asset. So if you are getting paid in BTC, that, to them, would
310.
▲
by
s73ver_
9y ago
BTC and USD are not on the same level. That's why your analogy doesn't work.
311.
▲
by
s73ver_
9y ago
Yes, you do.
312.
▲
by
s73ver_
9y ago
Same way you'd keep track of any other profits. And, in the eyes of the IRS, it is your responsibility to do so.
313.
▲
by
s73ver_
9y ago
Please, next time use a normal gallery style layout. And, no pictures of the inside? That's probably the most interesting, and most important part.
314.
▲
by
s73ver_
9y ago
Money is the easiest way, but it seems like it's always the way of last resort, after everything else has been tried, and those things have blown up in their face.
315.
▲
by
s73ver_
9y ago
They know that the options would be quite difficult to pass up, and so they don't have to try as hard to retain people during that time. "Treat like shit" may be a slight exaggeration, but we've also all heard about the
316.
▲
by
s73ver_
9y ago
I think we'd need both "assumed value of options", and "Actual value of options when they were realized"
317.
▲
by
s73ver_
9y ago
I think it is a bad thing because it encourages the company to treat people like shit.
318.
▲
by
s73ver_
9y ago
But if we all do demand that, then they won't have a choice.
319.
▲
by
s73ver_
9y ago
Having worked in a few agencies and departments that do both iOS and Android apps, whenever possible, they want parity between the two. So if the Android app is doing it, odds are better than not that the iOS app is also doing it to the ext
320.
▲
by
s73ver_
9y ago
Neither of those justifies taxing a person making 30k as if they're making 80k.
321.
▲
by
s73ver_
9y ago
"Alternatively, they didn't have much confidence that the folks who are exploiting grad students would be good consultants about grad student welfare." Ok, but then who did they talk to about grad student welfare?
322.
▲
by
s73ver_
9y ago
Nobody but the GOP is to blame for what's in the GOP's bill.
323.
▲
by
s73ver_
9y ago
I disagree. If I unleash a horde of spambots on this site, posting spam, and they get removed, am I being censored? If I constantly use slurs and other insults at other users, and I get my account banned because of it, am I being censored?
324.
▲
by
s73ver_
9y ago
He doesn't make a valid point, though. He makes a completely orthogonal point. If you believe his point, that what Twitter is doing is bad, then how can you justify expanding the ability to do that to other, unavoidable actors? If I do
325.
▲
by
s73ver_
9y ago
It doesn't, though. There's also the concept of "free association," which is included in "free speech". Look at it this way: HN is a very heavily moderated board. There are lots of troll posts and spam posts th
326.
▲
by
s73ver_
9y ago
Except each of those companies has competition. Voat and Gab, among others, were born out of the idea that Reddit and Twitter were being unfair. And one had the ability to join one of those alternative platforms, even while still remaining
327.
▲
by
s73ver_
9y ago
The thing I ultimately don't get, and that makes this entire argument disingenuous, is that, if you believe that what Twitter is doing is wrong, then why on earth would you decide that you want to enable more actors, especially ones th
328.
▲
by
s73ver_
9y ago
They said UI code. You shouldn't be reusing that anyway. You should be writing stuff to take advantage of the native platform.
329.
▲
by
s73ver_
9y ago
I mean, there is going to be an adult on the bus. There is no way they're going to put a bunch of schoolchildren on there unsupervised.
330.
▲
by
s73ver_
9y ago
Yes, competition would be nice. And you won't find a single NN proponent who would be opposed to increasing competition. But you know what? That's a completely orthogonal argument. Because we do not currently live in a world with
More ›