s73ver

11 ms·

31.
by s73ver 9y ago
I think they're saying the author should be fired because they're openly creating a hostile workplace for other groups. And historically, women are underrepresented in tech, and are not in a position of power. Conservative men are
32.
by s73ver 9y ago
It's very much not trivial, though. Given two solutions to a coding problem, how do you objectively determine which one is better? More importantly, how do you objectively tell if either of them is good enough? Or if they're poor?
33.
by s73ver 9y ago
He can be both charming and intelligent, and a complete douchebag at the same time.
34.
by s73ver 9y ago
It's just a really old version.
35.
by s73ver 9y ago
"Not that it's worth wading too far into this, but there is no good reason to believe those people were there specifically for harassment." Yes, their is. Their behavior, both at the event and their prior behavior online towa
36.
by s73ver 9y ago
It is very much not a lie. They sat in the first three rows, and they were all pointing cameras at her. Hell, some of those people even went on youtube after to brag about what they did. https://www.polygon.com/features&#x2F
37.
by s73ver 9y ago
I'm sorry, but your examples are quite out of context. Read the story about Sarkeesian's thing. Those people were there specifically for harassment. I cannot be upset at her for calling him out, and I cannot be upset that he was b
38.
by s73ver 9y ago
The "if you acknowledge racism exists, then you're the real racist!" argument has never held water before.
39.
by s73ver 9y ago
Right, but you don't get that pair of shoes unless you pay. We've tried with doing things like, "You won't get to watch that video or read that article unless you pay." It doesn't work.
40.
by s73ver 9y ago
Maybe Free Speech wouldn't be under such an assault if people weren't saying that you have to allow everything, including harassment and doxxing, to not be "assaulting free speech". Not to mention that doxxing and harass
41.
by s73ver 9y ago
Sure there is. Free speech doesn't give you an excuse to behave terribly, such as doxxing and the like.
42.
by s73ver 9y ago
They never put enough effort behind anything to get it to stick. And you can only do that so many times before people are just not interested in what you have to offer because, no matter how good it might be, they're thinking that you&
43.
by s73ver 9y ago
Except that's not true in the least. They're not paid according to their worth; they're paid according to what they can negotiate. These are two entirely separate things. I guarantee you that at least half the people on this
44.
by s73ver 9y ago
"plus it's incongruent to diss a community while you're participating in it." No. Your attitude here is the crappy one. Without being called out, a community will never grow. It's entirely appropriate to call out a
45.
by s73ver 9y ago
You still have to sell that output. And until you do, you have to store that output. And if you can't sell that output, then you have to get rid of it in a fire sale.
46.
by s73ver 9y ago
Cause that's Socialism(TM)!
47.
by s73ver 9y ago
Maybe. Although I'd think a consumer friendly policy would tend to drive scammers out, but the lure of Amazon may be too big for them to resist.
48.
by s73ver 9y ago
I'd say the wave of scammers operating on Amazon is worse for consumers.
49.
by s73ver 9y ago
It's still no excuse for Coinbase to hold onto something that is not theirs.
50.
by s73ver 9y ago
And yet, the consumers have still all lost.
51.
by s73ver 9y ago
Wouldn't these guys get enough low rankings because of that to be kicked off the platform?
52.
by s73ver 9y ago
"It works much better than you think" It still doesn't work as well as a native app.
53.
by s73ver 9y ago
If an organization isn't taking the time and effort to make sure their app isn't bloated full of stuff, what makes you think they'll do that?
54.
by s73ver 9y ago
I have to imagine the vast majority either don't care, or have other reasons for not having the app on there (like the company itself, for one).
55.
by s73ver 9y ago
90% of the time, the organizations that say stuff like this just don't have any discipline. You can move plenty fast with a well engineered product.
56.
by s73ver 9y ago
However, they usually are designed around a target size. And it's quite possible that, scaled too small, much of the detail is lost. Hence why you'd still want different vector files for different resolutions.
57.
by s73ver 9y ago
I highly doubt that. Few people actually know how big any given app is. Plus, there are more compelling things keeping people on their platform of choice, like iMessage or the sunken cost of apps that they've already purchased.
58.
by s73ver 9y ago
Except they have been working on it, by repackaging apps to strip out unneeded assets. And it is in Apple's interest to have smaller apps, because then people will be able to download more apps. They'll be willing to try more apps
59.
by s73ver 9y ago
Homebrew I believe goes through GitHub. Many of the Vim plugin managers also do, or at least have the option. I think CocoaPods and Carthage, both for iOS development, do as well. I think it's somewhat common for a new package manager
60.
by s73ver 9y ago
A lot of package manager tools download their packages from Github. If you happened to be refreshing your dependencies at the time, or doing a clean build, then you'd be SOL.

More ›