s73v3r

56 ms·

571.
by s73v3r 11y ago
Except now you're adding the traffic that was there to all the other lanes, and you're adding cars at the same time. The key to traffic is to REDUCE the amount of cars on the road, not increase it.
572.
by s73v3r 11y ago
Every study ever done has shown that getting rid of carpool lanes is just about the worst thing you could do. All those people that were in the carpool lane are now in with the general traffic, and they're not carpooling. So there are
573.
by s73v3r 11y ago
Most people do not have a choice as to when they work. They don't have flexible hours. So now you're just slapping an extra tax on them for no reason.
574.
by s73v3r 11y ago
"Why is congestion pricing never brought up in any of these conversations about traffic?" Because it would be incredibly regressive. The people who can least afford the fee are those that are not at all in the position to change t
575.
by s73v3r 11y ago
What if there is only one high school in the area? Also, the argument isn't that gifted students are responsible for pulling up peers. The argument is that by being around people like that, it benefits others. Much like integrating sch
576.
by s73v3r 11y ago
They're required to make sure the kids at the bottom can pass. The kids at the top already are passing, so spending money on them is extra.
577.
by s73v3r 11y ago
Generally the alcohol level is not part of the taste.
578.
by s73v3r 11y ago
I hope that's coming out of your share.
579.
by s73v3r 11y ago
And at the same time, it's also the fault of the people who released the data. Because they released the data.
580.
by s73v3r 11y ago
No. Not at all.
581.
by s73v3r 11y ago
If you were only telling the person being cheated on, you might have a point. But since you're now telling the entire world that someone was cheated on, or maybe not even cheated on, you've kinda lost that.
582.
by s73v3r 11y ago
There has to be an extremely strong moral case to override something already being illegal. This doesn't even come close.
583.
by s73v3r 11y ago
So tell me, why could the child not stay with his father? Why was it better that he live in a flophouse?
584.
by s73v3r 11y ago
But you didn't.
585.
by s73v3r 11y ago
Why? Why should we be happy that a lot of people just had their personal information leaked online because of a bunch of assholes?
586.
by s73v3r 11y ago
It was the entire point of the story. So it is something that is up for discussion. I see almost no reason why the child didn't stay with his dad during that time.
587.
by s73v3r 11y ago
To me, that sounds like he was trying to make arrangements to go with them. You don't need to have a substitute teacher to watch a child; there are daycare options, or he could bring the child to the school. Doesn't seem like a wo
588.
by s73v3r 11y ago
I honestly do not see why the child had to go with. What was wrong with the husband taking care of him?
589.
by s73v3r 11y ago
I had one of these. Unfortunately, I grew up in a small town in the Midwest, and so no one else had one. Meaning most of the wireless functionality was useless to me.
590.
by s73v3r 11y ago
That's a very shitty amount of recourse.
591.
by s73v3r 11y ago
"I'm okay with apps becoming non-profitable commodities" As a developer, I'm not.
592.
by s73v3r 11y ago
"Better to focus development on the remaining 22%, esp with that 30% Apple market overhead.... ???" You realize that Google has the exact same 30% overhead, right?
593.
by s73v3r 11y ago
To me, it's not. They're putting more burden on you, for the same amount of pay, effectively decreasing your pay. Add that with the goal of non-competes being to make it harder for you to leave the company, thus lowering your barg
594.
by s73v3r 11y ago
I don't care who's company it is. Owning a company doesn't give you the right to do whatever you want.
595.
by s73v3r 11y ago
"Continued employment is, in fact, new consideration." That is complete horseshit.
596.
by s73v3r 11y ago
Technically either side can. However, it's not a hard guess as to which side actually has the power to impose something like this. And it's not the employees.
597.
by s73v3r 11y ago
That's not much of a right, though.
598.
by s73v3r 11y ago
And almost hitting someone because you're texting instead of paying attention to where you're going isn't?
599.
by s73v3r 11y ago
Probably because those of us who do live here have seen it.
600.
by s73v3r 11y ago
So basically you do not have numbers to back up your claims.

More ›