Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
s1mplicissimus
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
61.
▲
by
s1mplicissimus
10mo ago
"If you don't migrate I will tell your mum"
62.
▲
by
s1mplicissimus
10mo ago
I get that it's nice to be able to deprecate/remove things. But intentionally breaking my users runtime in a way that's really hard and annoying to find? Is the author OK? This reads like a madman to me.
63.
▲
by
s1mplicissimus
10mo ago
i assumed it was the egg plant, guess i'm getting old
64.
▲
by
s1mplicissimus
10mo ago
It's not very current, but I remember this being one of my favorite books back in college: The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark by Carl Sagan
65.
▲
by
s1mplicissimus
10mo ago
This is what's going to happen: - Formally verifiable specs improve the absolute garbage that is LLM generated code to an acceptable degree. - Realization: Providing formally verifiable specifications is actually a lot of work - Light
66.
▲
by
s1mplicissimus
10mo ago
It's called "aligning with company culture" or "not being difficult" among others
67.
▲
by
s1mplicissimus
10mo ago
They probably didn't call it "AI" before, but I'm pretty confident they used pattern/similarity hash matching for a long time. The indeterminism of "AI" makes it a handy excuse for "mistakes". Se
68.
▲
by
s1mplicissimus
10mo ago
Agreed with the sentiment, but calling OpenAI a "smaller company" after it's just been infused with multiple hundreds of billions, is a bit of a stretch
69.
▲
by
s1mplicissimus
10mo ago
Yet both can be at alarmingly high rates at the same time, it's not like one cancels the other out
70.
▲
by
s1mplicissimus
10mo ago
that's gonna be painful, as the borrow checker really trips up LLMs
71.
▲
by
s1mplicissimus
10mo ago
Does anyone of the finance pros here know if there would have been a way to profit off predicting that ads would be introduced into chatbot responses?
72.
▲
by
s1mplicissimus
10mo ago
And became pretty bad afterwards
73.
▲
by
s1mplicissimus
10mo ago
I'm always glad to see others notice this too. cheers
74.
▲
by
s1mplicissimus
10mo ago
Hard to tell, as those 2 specific services are currently monopolized by a company who refuses to offer those specific services ad-free
75.
▲
by
s1mplicissimus
10mo ago
video game "journalism", car magazines, travel reviews, restaurant reviews
76.
▲
by
s1mplicissimus
10mo ago
> Can you give an example of "solicited advertising"? I have never heard of such a thing, and can't imagine what it might be. The only thing I would consider solicited is when I decide that I want to see product informat
77.
▲
by
s1mplicissimus
10mo ago
> Okay, thw question then becomes: How do we get people to deliberatly look? You don't. Because you don't get to manipulate my attention. That simple.
78.
▲
by
s1mplicissimus
10mo ago
> By what other means would people with a product or service to provide reach other people who are interested in obtaining that product or service? Easy: provide informational material. I will fetch it if/when I'm interested. D
79.
▲
by
s1mplicissimus
10mo ago
I always dreaded those social activities. Even when "not mandatory" it was always expected to show up and pretend to have more in common with the peers than "I'm here to do the work and collect a paycheck" anyway.
80.
▲
by
s1mplicissimus
10mo ago
Thanks for the link. For anyone interested, here's the process outlined in the document, I'm gonna try to apply and see where that leads. # Steps to interoperate with Messenger or WhatsApp Note: Separate documentation and applicat
81.
▲
by
s1mplicissimus
11mo ago
I wanted to try this, but it's not possible (yet?) for regular folks apparently. Supposedly the two apps "BirdyChat" and "Hiket" are WA compatible. Both are waitlist only. Even after searching for ~15 minutes, I cou
82.
▲
by
s1mplicissimus
11mo ago
One could argue that pointing out the pointlessness of LLM hype is infact useful, while producing that same hype is not
83.
▲
by
s1mplicissimus
11mo ago
Agreed that stupid proxies were removed. And I'm not shedding a single tear for the idiots that made a living enforcing them
84.
▲
by
s1mplicissimus
11mo ago
okay commentless downvotes I assume it's the grokbots
85.
▲
by
s1mplicissimus
11mo ago
And that's for tasks it's actually suited for
86.
▲
by
s1mplicissimus
11mo ago
I personally would not want to waste their time by writing them my personal opinion on a ruling I agree with
87.
▲
by
s1mplicissimus
11mo ago
> Being a crazy authoritarian guy with power of life and death over each of your citizens is one. No government at all is the other extreme no, the other extreme of "crazy authoritarian" is "liberal democracy" The oth
88.
▲
by
s1mplicissimus
11mo ago
Hmm I get it's a thrill for the author to get exposure/internetfame, but what's in it for the bettors? Looks to me that if bets reach enough of a one-sided weight, it's super easy for OP to just "forget" to stu
89.
▲
by
s1mplicissimus
11mo ago
Nice to see a fellow awesome( )wmer, hi!
90.
▲
by
s1mplicissimus
11mo ago
Can we have a look at X's finances too and have an opinion on wether people should give them money?
More ›