Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
rzwitserloot
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
15 ms
·
31.
▲
by
rzwitserloot
1y ago
BIG EDIT: Because it's so trivially unsolvable, I had a quick look at the posted solution. We're reading it wrong. Take the first regex on the top row, one you included in your example: [^X]*(DN|TE|NI) You're supposed to fill
32.
▲
by
rzwitserloot
1y ago
Not sure what happened there but your link disproves your statement. Specifically, the link says two things: 1. That 2 parties want to add *limburgish* to the list, not frisian. That's the bottom-right part of The Netherlands, about as
33.
▲
by
rzwitserloot
1y ago
important context: That gas is theoretical/unproduced. You need to dig lots of wells first. Even there I don't really see it. I agree that it was intended as an easy land grab (and I guess, after Hostomel failed, they should have
34.
▲
by
rzwitserloot
1y ago
> But ... LocalDate predated records by 6 years? Yes, exactly - now you're getting it. Or rather I get the feeling I failed to explain it well. ArrayList predates generics. However, ArrayList does have generics . That's becau
35.
▲
by
rzwitserloot
1y ago
> For example they used checked exceptions. Those are from java 1.0 and thus don't appear to be relevant to the part of the discussion I think this part of the thread is about (namely: "Why doesn't java crib well designed
36.
▲
by
rzwitserloot
1y ago
OpenJDK redesigns massive swaths of the compiler every other month. The true explanation, at least the way OpenJDK says it, is that designing language features is more complex than a casual glancer can fathom, and there's 30 years of &
37.
▲
by
rzwitserloot
1y ago
That's not how the OpenJDK sees things. They tend to think that the features they deliver are at best mildly informed by other languages. Not out of some sense of hubris, but out of a sense of pragmatics: Simply copy and pasting featur
38.
▲
by
rzwitserloot
1y ago
This could have easily been a youtube short or whatever 'vine offshoot' is your particular favourite flavour. On one hand, videos are terrible for accessibility. On the other hand, by being a website, in theory this stands a bette
39.
▲
by
rzwitserloot
1y ago
She managed to convince a people of a country that has been entrenched in authoritarianism that the vote was rigged without using violence. Imagine one day we wake up after the usual yawn-inducing sham elections in Russia and Putin won as u
40.
▲
by
rzwitserloot
1y ago
My comment originally contained something along the lines of "When the invasion of hostomel failed, they should have ended their operation on the spot" but that felt too presumptuous. But perhaps it did inform my sense that this w
41.
▲
by
rzwitserloot
1y ago
> Debatable This war either ends eventually or we move back to 'there are clear questions about what is going to happen to the stability of the regime' territory. And when it ends we... also move back to that. Probably, anyway.
42.
▲
by
rzwitserloot
1y ago
That sounds like "the leg amputation operation was a success, other than the fact that the patient died on the operating table". That "except" is doing rather a lot of heavy lifting. I have absolutely no idea what Russia
43.
▲
by
rzwitserloot
1y ago
It's an interesting lesson. I think I do get it. This is one of those rare cases where: * This interpreation is understandable: 'this is a ridiculous cash grab, this single act says so much about the attitude of this company tha
44.
▲
by
rzwitserloot
1y ago
I see two ways to fight supply chain attacks: * The endless arms race. But, nevermind. It's been 2 years since Jia Tan and the amount of such 'occurrences' in the npm ecosystem in the past 10 years are bordering on uncountabl
45.
▲
by
rzwitserloot
1y ago
For context, in The Netherlands, supermarkets are in urban areas and have no parking lot at all or a relatively tiny one. The usual USian aspect of schlepping a shopping cart waay out to your car and then not wanting to schlep it back or to
46.
▲
by
rzwitserloot
1y ago
I don't think so. Even a villain is the hero in their own story. For the vast majority of folks who are or would be a nuisance in flight, I'm pretty sure: * If they hear about stories where folks got punished for being obnoxious,
47.
▲
by
rzwitserloot
1y ago
That does have the slight disadvantage that a glassed parking lot, utterly uniform and totally devoid of all life, is quite stable. I agree that it'd be lovely to have a definition that is devoid of subjective (human) judgement, but I
48.
▲
by
rzwitserloot
1y ago
What a weird end to a fascinating article. It's like I'm reading the words of a political prisoner. Everything in the first ~80% of it sets up for a conclusion of 'one-sidedly slapping a ton of tariffs on all the things and e
49.
▲
by
rzwitserloot
1y ago
Near the end, the post jumps to conclusions. It starts with 'there is a tariff difference - 2.5% vs 10%, on car imports from europe to the US vs the opposite direction' and then jumps to '... and this explains why there are w
50.
▲
by
rzwitserloot
1y ago
I've been yelling 'omg why doesnt someone build a ticketing system on the basis of git, having a separate 'root' (no-parent git commit that is at the bottom of a git tree; technically a git repo can have more than one),
51.
▲
by
rzwitserloot
1y ago
I assume you meant with the AOT argument: "The initial few minutes of a JVM's existence, which would be the entire lifetime if you're using java the way you use e.g. your average executable in your `/usr/bin` dir&qu
52.
▲
by
rzwitserloot
1y ago
I think it was Heinlein who came up with it, but it's a principle that basic logic dictates is obvious: Power and Responsibility - those must be 2 sides of the same coin, or very very bad things happen. The mindset of 'too big to
53.
▲
by
rzwitserloot
1y ago
That's judging a book by its cover territory. You can do that: Life is too short to do a whole bunch of research just to check anything you hear, so you have to judge statements using known imprecise and dangerously oversimplified me
54.
▲
by
rzwitserloot
1y ago
This is an ad hominem attack in the sense that PK has laid out the logic underlying his statement here. He is not asking that you are to trust his point based solely on his say-so. The right approach is: "This argument is dubious /
55.
▲
by
rzwitserloot
1y ago
I don't understand what you're on about. The only laws that the USA has on the books that says anything about this are either [A] recently written state laws written as vehicles to virtue signal, particularly by DeSantis in Florid
56.
▲
by
rzwitserloot
1y ago
> Technically, the first amendment applies only to state actors, not private entities. That's probably not what the person you're responding to is talking about. Americans have this unfortunate tendency to harp on and on about
57.
▲
by
rzwitserloot
2y ago
I pay sales tax when I buy something with money I have. That was already taxed. Huffing and Puffing about paying taxes when you do a thing _just_ because the thing you are doing, you do with money you already paid taxes on - is a crazy idea
58.
▲
by
rzwitserloot
2y ago
"Death Tax"? What the heck are you on about? The dead aren't taxed, they can't, they are dead. What are you going to do to them as punishment if they fail to comply? Shoot the corpse? It's a tax levied on those who
59.
▲
by
rzwitserloot
2y ago
It mostly says that one of the seriously difficult challenges with LLMs is a meta-challenge: * LLMs are dangerously useless for certain domains. * ... but can be quite useful for others. * The real problem is: They make it real tricky to te
60.
▲
by
rzwitserloot
2y ago
The thing LLMs are really really good at, is sounding authoritative. If you ask it random things the output looks amazing, yes. At least at first glance. That's what they do. It's indeed magical, a true marvel that should ma
More ›