Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
rvz
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
151.
▲
by
rvz
2mo ago
I don't think they care. It is up to you to consider local models or better alternatives instead of paying for more tokens at their casino.
152.
▲
by
rvz
2mo ago
Agreed. For everyone else, Heed this serious warning and that applies to everyone else. HN is not for frequent promotional spam, or anything else related to as such. It is not worth it.
153.
▲
by
rvz
2mo ago
You need to say thank you to "AI" for that one. At least modern blockchains found efficient methods without requiring the worlds RAM.
154.
▲
by
rvz
2mo ago
Unbelievable. So crypto pump fun scams are allowed on HN? Please stop posting these scams.
155.
▲
by
rvz
2mo ago
Hang on... My comment was not made "hours ago". It was made 3 days (2026-08-29) before this post reached the front page. You can hover over the "hours ago" link and the timestamp does not match the title. Why is the time
156.
▲
by
rvz
2mo ago
> I answered your question. "you ever ask Nvidia why? i did." No you did not. You are referring to a question that I already answered for you [0]. Your answer was incorrect. >> The correct answer to my question is "
157.
▲
by
rvz
2mo ago
> Nope. It was released when ... The rest of the details to this are irrelevant. We already know that it was not open-sourced 'from the start' and as you just admitted, it took a week to get it ready and transition it from clo
158.
▲
by
rvz
2mo ago
This is the Darling project which aims to run macOS software on Linux for both Intel and ARM64. But you are probably looking for this: > Does it support GUI apps? > Almost! This took us a lot of time and effort, but we finally
159.
▲
by
rvz
2mo ago
> Sometimes things just don't get traction. Resubmit is ok. More like it was resubmitted a hundred times already.
160.
▲
by
rvz
2mo ago
> It took about a week to get Sun Microsystems to open source Tomcat and Ant, which became massively distributed and used software. So that was not even open sourced “from the start” either. You understand that you just undermined your o
161.
▲
by
rvz
2mo ago
It is because the data center build out is building homes for agents rather than for humans. Just ask Zuckerberg about why he REALLY wants to replace 50% of his staff with AI just like Elon has done.
162.
▲
by
rvz
2mo ago
Once again, continues to gaslight after spamming a post with another top-posted comment after having to “justify” it. In this case, You already admitted to it. There is just no end or need to rapidly post on every opportunity that involves
163.
▲
by
rvz
2mo ago
Almost, but not quite. I would say "protected" accounts and domain names by well known YC folks are "allowed" to do this on this site. If is anyone else, then they get themselves banned.
164.
▲
by
rvz
2mo ago
We are not asking you to repeat the full conversation here. We just want the actual solution that was discussed. So could you give a short elaboration on what was this "better computer science" solution that you came up with in
165.
▲
by
rvz
2mo ago
Almost everyone is now about to feel what Lee Sedol felt a decade ago. We are all Lee Sedol.
166.
▲
by
rvz
2mo ago
I don't believe that you even know yourself. > If it was going to "eventually" be made open source, why not do it from the start? Why not do it a year in? That isn't how open sourcing software works. It gets released
167.
▲
by
rvz
2mo ago
Same here. But of course and as expected; 5 hours later, the GP comment offers no proper solutions for this "better computer science" they speak of. It shows they really don't care and they are just rage-baiting readers in th
168.
▲
by
rvz
2mo ago
> If you work in tech, your manager might still care about your career. They just might not have enough time to do much about it. Narrator: They never did. It is a free-for-all office politics game and it is your own responsibility and n
169.
▲
by
rvz
2mo ago
It is because many "developers" want to pretend that they have read the code and have understood it so they can claim it as their own. Attribution is indeed professional. If you use an AI to write the code for you and have no idea
170.
▲
by
rvz
2mo ago
So now we are using vibe coded disk fragmenters that actually touch the disk state on your machine. It has little to no tests. Now HNers here don't even question the soundness of this software and just assume it works as it was suspici
171.
▲
by
rvz
2mo ago
> We’re down. We’re on it. Already learning things the hard way. What a joke. Also I don't think that site will last a year because... ...Twitter is a registered trademark of X Corp. A subsidiary of SpaceXAI and is under the parent
172.
▲
by
rvz
2mo ago
Aviation Legend. RIP Azriel.
173.
▲
by
rvz
2mo ago
I ain't reading all that. Just open an issue to them, or roll back to the last working version. No need to paste an entire token dump here.
174.
▲
by
rvz
2mo ago
Or maybe Anthropic needs more companies like Warp to run Claude in thousands of loops to donate billions to their income statement. The I in AGI stands for "IPO".
175.
▲
by
rvz
2mo ago
You may not know this - Levels is an investor in Fal.ai and that is why they are sponsoring this to run all of this as it is very expensive ($4,000 a day). Just like with VCs, this is essentially paid marketing.
176.
▲
by
rvz
2mo ago
I have asked multiple times on who is making money on OpenClaw directly other than the service providers. It is clear that almost no-one is and it appears to be a hyped-up fad.
177.
▲
by
rvz
2mo ago
Doing the opposite (disallowing AI), will place it on a path of getting riddled with security issues. When attackers are using AI to both find vulnerabilities and build exploits faster than Debian can figure out how to patch the project wit
178.
▲
by
rvz
2mo ago
This is the sensible option and well reasoned position, rather than a zero vote, total and complete ban by a single core maintainer, which is rather destructive for a project to do. When you ask others that use AI frequently, the responsibi
179.
▲
by
rvz
2mo ago
Now you have seen both cases where a majority vote was involved to allow AI or not, vs a single core beloved dictator for life (BDFL) forces a ban without a vote to allow / disallow AI. This is democracy in action. A fair and square vo
180.
▲
by
rvz
2mo ago
You mean more “housing” for agents? (Data centers) Sounds like SF would rather agree to that than more housing for humans.
More ›