rvz

30 ms·

751.
by rvz 5mo ago
Unfortunately, Zuck calls the shots at Meta for good or bad. He does not care about you. If you do not like it, have the guts to just leave to company.
752.
by rvz 5mo ago
All of them.
753.
by rvz 5mo ago
Or running random curl | bash scripts from GitHub, AUR, NPM are just as bad but many developers here still have dubious assumptions on this bad practice. The last few weeks tell us how bad this is especially with all the mini-shai hulud&#x2
754.
by rvz 5mo ago
Unbelievable.
755.
by rvz 5mo ago
If you are porting anything from C into WebAssembly, keep in mind that you still inherit C based vulnerabilities. [0] [1] [0] https://soft.vub.ac.be/Publications/2022/vub-tr-soft-22-02.p... [1] https:/&#x2F
756.
by rvz 5mo ago
We would have heard about one already by now but it appears that we are still waiting. Or maybe it is not worth the time and tokens spent to vibe code yet another Minecraft / Roblox clone that makes no money.
757.
by rvz 5mo ago
Turns out that the people screaming about using AI for everything were the investors who already invested in the AI tool they are trying to sell to you.
758.
by rvz 5mo ago
Yes. They got even more than what they asked for.
759.
by rvz 5mo ago
Would you rather: A: Have $100M - $1BN in cash without a calendar full of meetings and you have the freedom to control your time. B: Have $800BN - $1TN in stock which you cannot sell and you have a calendar full of daily meetings, zero brea
760.
by rvz 5mo ago
No. This one. [0]. Even before that, there are several other sandbox escapes that predated the one you posted. [1] [2] and this one [3] can be used to trivially escape its sandbox with either of these vulnerabilities. So it is not the magic
761.
by rvz 5mo ago
This sounds like a solution looking for an unnecessary security nightmare. Something as little as the runtime can just get exploited (which that as happened.) and cause a sandbox escape on the client side. There was a Chrome 0day at the run
762.
by rvz 5mo ago
Depends. A trillion dollars in cash is different to a trillion in stock. If if was in cash, the money will go back into donations, charities, invest it in more startups ad the majority to fund for research.
763.
by rvz 5mo ago
That is Anthropic's problem, and that's good for competition.
764.
by rvz 5mo ago
> Serving Opus 4.8 isn't worth a trillion+ valuation. > The valuation of the AI labs is based on continual improvements of their models. While I do agree, no-one here made the initial claim on their valuation and especially sugge
765.
by rvz 5mo ago
Who's on Arch Linux btw?
766.
by rvz 5mo ago
But it is written in Rust™.
767.
by rvz 5mo ago
Opus 4.8 is still available to everyone, and the export ban applied specifically to their new Fable / Mythos models. But nice try though. This sort of attention is exactly what they would to showcase the powerful capabilities of thei
768.
by rvz 5mo ago
Actually, they got even more than what they wanted: * Free marketing before the IPO, demonstrating how already powerful their frontier models are. * Governments to intervene in the rollout of these frontier models and blocking their acces
769.
by rvz 5mo ago
This is what Anthropic wanted and they want this to apply to all other frontier models providers (including themselves) that release powerful models. > As we have stated publicly, we believe the government should have the ability to bloc
770.
by rvz 5mo ago
So the US government was able to shut down that upgraded version of that slot machine in Anthropic's casino because of how powerful it is? There is something called the Streisand effect and they are about to unintentionally get a bunch
771.
by rvz 5mo ago
> I'm kind of reminded of when Microsoft claimed it took a team of Ph.D.s to write a terminal application that updated at 60fps, and then Casey Muratori did it over a weekend. This is the same Microsoft that is now rewriting the Typ
772.
by rvz 5mo ago
By being clearly envious because the employees at SpaceX (4K+) got rewarded and you didn't? You could have ignored this post, but here you are commenting about it and posting schadenfreude over it. It's okay to be a bit jealous of
773.
by rvz 5mo ago
HN is blocking it because they believed that X was going to fail in 2022 and could never admit that they were incorrect and could not stand the success of the SpaceX IPO. The envy here is astronomical.
774.
by rvz 5mo ago
If you are non-technical, in-experienced or just learning, it is okay to admit that you have no idea what you are doing when building production systems. Otherwise, you will face an expensive lesson when turning a $100 issue into a $100,000
775.
by rvz 5mo ago
As a last resort, do the code-review with a live pair programming session. If they can't explain their own code then it is by default a bad pull request. At the end of the day, everyone's time is being wasted on tokens and on the
776.
by rvz 5mo ago
Why would anyone defend Anthropic after this? Imagine falling for the DoW supply chain risk designation, and now this. This company is trying to ban powerful open models and restrict access to frontier models to slow everyone else down. The
777.
by rvz 5mo ago
Y?
778.
by rvz 5mo ago
To those who were playing Pokemon Go ten years ago. Thanks for playing. (You got played)
779.
by rvz 5mo ago
> It most certainly will replace software engineers. What's missing is, as the article suggests, the "Delivery" bit. But that's not the realm of software engineers, that's the realm of DevOps/SRE/Cloud
780.
by rvz 5mo ago
Fortunately, you can self-host your own version of GitLab (or Gitea, Foregjo) and you would not be affected by their outages at all. Unlike GitHub which something goes down every week. (unless you have $$$ for Enterprise)

More ›