rvnx

19 ms·

481.
by rvnx 11mo ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vw699ZbUKqg Looks very playable to me. It's just an expensive card, but if the market is flooded with them, they can be used in gaming AND in local LLMs. So it can push the fall of serve
482.
by rvnx 11mo ago
This article presents it as a big success, but it could be read the opposite way: "Developers of Helldivers 2 wasted 130 GB for years and didn't care because it was others people computers"
483.
by rvnx 11mo ago
They are also good at selling cloud hosting and services like LLMs (despite their horrible billing practices where there is no limit)
484.
by rvnx 11mo ago
State Of The Art is maybe a bit exaggerated. It's more like an early model that never really adapted, and only got watered down (smaller network, outdated information, and you cannot see thought/reasoning). Also their models get d
485.
by rvnx 11mo ago
It was more of a general principle than about specific paper that I mentioned that :)
486.
by rvnx 11mo ago
Imagine how big pile of trash as the current generation of graphics cards used for LLM training will get outdated. It will crash the hardware market (which is a good news for gamers)
487.
by rvnx 11mo ago
Absolutely. If it is not written by someone who has real world experience and deep knowledge it has no more value than a HN comment.
488.
by rvnx 11mo ago
There will always be a place for calligraphy, artisan, who place creativity, handcraft and art first. You can see it like pizzas: there will always be someone who actually makes these pizzas from scratch; grows his own tomatoes in his garde
489.
by rvnx 11mo ago
Soon they are going out of business anyway since they will be replaced by generative AI (which will look the same)
490.
by rvnx 11mo ago
MIT code, let Bun continue develop it, once project is abandoned hire the developers. If they don't want to maintain; GitHub fork with more motivated people.
491.
by rvnx 11mo ago
Google (generalist/media) > Anthropic (code) > x.AI (excellent price/quality balance). ChatGPT is a bit late now (even behind DeepSeek with DeepThink I believe)
492.
by rvnx 11mo ago
Often it happens that VCs buy out companies from funds belonging to a fresh because the selling fund wants to show performance to their investors until "the big one", or move cash one from wealthy pocket to another one. "You
493.
by rvnx 11mo ago
It's plausible, in 2026, we are going to send to Mars fully autonomous humanoid robots, so AGI is right around the corner. https://youtu.be/TsNc4nEX3c4?t=5
494.
by rvnx 11mo ago
For text and image-based tasks they are infinitely better than a human. What they lack are arms to interact with the physical world, but once this is done this is a giant leap forward (example: they will obviously be able to do experiments
495.
by rvnx 11mo ago
Not sure why you are being downvoted. Seems like lot of people with high ego are not ready to accept the truth that a human has way less knowledge than a world encyclopedia with infinite and practically perfect memory.
496.
by rvnx 11mo ago
in practice: "hey man, this is Josh from OpenAI, can you disable 2FA on my account josh@openai.com ? I changed my phone and am abroad for a bit, thanks"
497.
by rvnx 11mo ago
GPL and copyright in general don't apply to billionaires, so pretty much a non-topic. It's just a side cost of doing business, because asking for forgiveness is cheaper and faster than asking for permission.
498.
by rvnx 11mo ago
The worst are the batwing / saloon doors, no idea who believes this is even a door
499.
by rvnx 11mo ago
Based on what he is building, it feels like _pdp_ is actually passionate about AI himself, and then ChatBotKit is a by-product of this passion. So pretty sure he'd use AI as much and root for it, even if not involved with that specific
500.
by rvnx 11mo ago
There is a big compliance issue as well, in many corporations, AI is strictly forbidden so employees will claim they do not use AI at all, but they do. Medical doctors as well, officially 0%, reality ? Also many programmers hide the truth,
501.
by rvnx 11mo ago
My close friends got showered so much with money poured down by investors that it is indecent. Just because they happened to be in the right place, at the right time, and idling, gets paid 10M USD+ due to stock options vetting. Sounds like
502.
by rvnx 11mo ago
It's very similar to LinkedIn posts, where everybody seems to know better than the people actually running the platforms.
503.
by rvnx 11mo ago
Do you believe so ? (like real question, not sarcastic here)
504.
by rvnx 11mo ago
Let's say OpenAI signed a commitment contract that they agreed to spend XXX USD in your company over N years. You invest in infrastructure, your contractors sometimes take loans, the construction companies take loans. Countries /
505.
by rvnx 11mo ago
If OpenAI fails, they could potentially bring in their downfall the major cloud providers who invested in hardware for them, expecting that it would pay-off over time.
506.
by rvnx 11mo ago
It would be plausible but very optimistic projection if there was no competition that is currently crushing OpenAI
507.
by rvnx 11mo ago
Not at all, it depends on the level of public exposure of the service. In a factory, access is the primary barrier. It's like an onion, outer surface has to be protected very well, but as you get deeper in the zone where less and less
508.
by rvnx 11mo ago
https://youtu.be/1zp3b6YCXqI The smelloscope, right ?
509.
by rvnx 1y ago
It's not bad at all though, but it needs lot a baby-sitting like "try again, try this, try that, are you sure that it is correct ?" For example, in a basic python script that uses os.path.exists, it forgets the basic "im
510.
by rvnx 1y ago
It's not really good for real-life programming though, it invents lot of imaginary things, cannot respect its own instructions, forgets basic things (variable is called "bananaDance", then claims it is "bananadance&quot

More ›