ruszki

8 ms·

91.
by ruszki 5mo ago
Anonymity is a two way thing. Maybe, I don't need to use "more or less". Maybe, I'm an ultra heavy user of AI. It's even possible that I'm magnitudes better developer in every single aspects. Maybe not. I'
92.
by ruszki 5mo ago
That can still easily mean that they didn’t give any value or minuscule amount of value to the project which caused their success. The most successful projects which I’ve seen closely, all of them had only a few people who mattered, everybo
93.
by ruszki 5mo ago
> And some can do both - but they are very rare, in my experience. As far as I know basically all of the successful software companies had these quite early. Of course, you need other kinds of people too. And not everybody needs to be li
94.
by ruszki 5mo ago
I’ve seen people coding for 4 decades, thinking the same as you about themselves, and were bad coders. Unfortunately, nobody can tell you whether you’re good or bad without seeing your code. Your claims means nothing on the internet.
95.
by ruszki 5mo ago
You fucked up causality. My sentence has a clear causality order, which you ignored. You are right if we ignore that, and you are right that people ignore logic many times. For a good reason. I replied like that because I think you applied
96.
by ruszki 5mo ago
If we strictly follow logic, then nobody and nothing can claim that anything is true or false. We just stick these labels to things which seems to have high enough probability. The problem is that “high enough” is very-very-very different f
97.
by ruszki 5mo ago
Kagi, unfortunately, is getting worse too. I think mainly because they don’t get access. But I’m not sure. I had to fallback more and more to Google, because Kagi couldn’t find exact matches, while Google could. Like texts which I copied fr
98.
by ruszki 5mo ago
Probably still a lot. If not, then all of these people who praise them are just bad developers.
99.
by ruszki 5mo ago
That’s only mandatory on the “hub”. I can do that locally anytime.
100.
by ruszki 5mo ago
One of my earliest memories is when I and my family draw and created black and white pictures via a word processor on our C64. There were characters which were different forms, like triangles, or small rectangles. Nowadays there are similar
101.
by ruszki 5mo ago
The problem with this mindset, that there is zero reason to move away from Git. I can do effortlessly everything with it. There is no incentive. I never said "it would be so good that I would be able to X"... and I didn't fin
102.
by ruszki 5mo ago
A monthly reminder, that they don't want smart people over there.
103.
by ruszki 5mo ago
It’s crazy that it’s magnitudes cheaper for me from the EU to go to a poor country with non existing administration, than the people from there to come to the EU. And magnitudes more convenient. Just to get a passport; for me, it’s a nuance
104.
by ruszki 5mo ago
With lmgtfy, the point was to show that you can do that with Google, how you can do it, and you shouldn’t ask (not in the nicest way for sure). With replying with an LLM answer, you pretend that I cannot do the same. The equivalent would be
105.
by ruszki 5mo ago
In end user perspective, it’s the same. The difference is probably volume. I have no clue in which direction. Both in trained lies by models and in number of people defending the indefensible. But one for sure, there are probably 10s or 100
106.
by ruszki 5mo ago
There is a difference between when somebody openly instructs their model to infer disproven lies vs who doesn’t do this. And it’s quite tiring that this is even a question because of politics. As somebody from Hungary: the biggest impact of
107.
by ruszki 5mo ago
You’re searching for 13166x, and not 157988x. “Times” is multiplication not exponentiation.
108.
by ruszki 5mo ago
The commenter above replied to me, who checked what it is, which is clearly stated in my comment. So your comment cannot be applied to the guy who came up the first with "learned helplessness" in this thread, who replied to me. Th
109.
by ruszki 5mo ago
You are making fun of people who are saying that this article is shit, without addressing that part at all.
110.
by ruszki 5mo ago
Nice catch, I didn't read that part.
111.
by ruszki 5mo ago
Its article is 5 years old… So, yeah, it’s new.
112.
by ruszki 5mo ago
If it means capture the flag, then it means a completely different capture the flag for almost everybody. I searched for it, read the first paragraph, and I still don’t know what the fuck is the topic. According to Wikipedia it’s a very new
113.
by ruszki 5mo ago
Hay, my nickname means “Russian”. And my real country of origin - Hungary was also not ideal until recently. I’ve heard a single instance in the past 40 years, that any of these caused any hatred showed up. And it didn’t even happen to me.
114.
by ruszki 5mo ago
What are the cases when you have to use divs or spans solely for design? When I did such things, it’s only because I was sloppy, or didn’t know back then how to do it without it. But maybe, there are cases, I’ve just never encountered them
115.
by ruszki 5mo ago
The car states that it connected to my phone and gets internet through it. There is a specific indicator for it. I have no clue what it downloads/uploads because I use it solely as a very expensive Bluetooth speaker.
116.
by ruszki 5mo ago
> An LLM can produce higher-quality documentation than most humans. Can bears some heavy weight. LLM generated documentation has so low level of information density, that it’s useless. Yes, it writes nice sentences… or even writes. But i
117.
by ruszki 5mo ago
My iPhone automatically shares the internet without enabling hotspot with my Toyota via Bluetooth. It happens automatically. I just start the car, and it happens. And CarPlay is not involved, since there is no such thing in my car.
118.
by ruszki 5mo ago
> you immediatelly see But that's simply not true at all. Let's start with token by token: items You have no clue what type of data ends up in `items`, or that something should end up in `items` at all. This is obvious.
119.
by ruszki 5mo ago
With my solution, you don't need to adapt... that's the whole point. There is no inversion.
120.
by ruszki 5mo ago
You can create a natural sentence for every permutation. There is an asterisk between mat and 2. mat asterisk 2. f(2) is a multiplication of mat.

More ›