ruszki

15 ms·

361.
by ruszki 1y ago
There is no difference between changing a law more, than less. It can be done the same way, with a single vote. So the balance doesn't matter at all, especially that voters clearly don't make distinctions based on that.
362.
by ruszki 1y ago
You need to use comments, when your code doesn't make sense to the reader. A way better approach is to write code which makes sense to readers. There are cases when you need to write incomprehensible code for the sake of performance, f
363.
by ruszki 1y ago
No, I’m arguing that it can be used for good, and it shouldn’t be dismissed when it cannot be used for evil things by law, especially not because of future possible evil usage, because that’s true for everything. Btw, why do use the interne
364.
by ruszki 1y ago
Yes? They can kill half Europe with a single nuclear power plant if they really want. They are safe only for accidents, and external sabotage. They are absolutely not for intentional internal fuck ups. The whole system is built on that most
365.
by ruszki 1y ago
With your logic, everything can be used, or change to be used in a bad way, so nothing should be changed. There is never a guarantee. Seriously, is there anything which cannot be changed to be shit, in the best case to be a worthless money
366.
by ruszki 1y ago
Different, but nobody could predict what would happen next. We know now how different it was, but we didn’t know back then how it would be different now. There were people/companies who were right, and more people who weren’t. I had
367.
by ruszki 1y ago
That’s dead: https://browsercompany.substack.com/p/letter-to-arc-members-... I didn’t know either until a few weeks ago.
368.
by ruszki 1y ago
I don’t know whether it’s possible with modern networks, but it was basically impossible to DDoS a tower with SMSs. Either the tower was unavailable at all times even without text messages, or SMSs never caused a problem. You couldn’t even
369.
by ruszki 1y ago
There isn’t. Yet, everybody knows what I mean under “propaganda against immigration” (just somebody would discredit it, somebody would fight for it), and nobody claims that the Hungarian government’s “information campaign” about migrants
370.
by ruszki 1y ago
> is never a code smell /* This changes the sorting of the original list based on the result, when you use a pipeline <- you have an architectural problem - this happens for example in Splunk */ map() /* You need to cal
371.
by ruszki 1y ago
Until now, it was a code smell if you need those often. There are exceptions to that, but those are a small minority. Also, design and rationale what humans need is different than what LLMs need. Even what is needed according to humans writ
372.
by ruszki 1y ago
The falling shrinkage is a good indicator, although it’s imperfect for obvious reasons. Of course, there are anomalies like COVID, but otherwise the trend is clear. Also when some entity like supermarket chains or their advocacy groups trie
373.
by ruszki 1y ago
His zero sum politics is not different than America’s zero sum politics at all. The consequences of these are well studied, and it can be predicted what will happen, and it could be predicted since at least 2014, even before Trump. It’s not
374.
by ruszki 1y ago
What you wrote can be even an anarchist view. What’s the difference in your point of view? How should a government solve problems without laws? What other options are there? Besides ignoring, obviously. I’m absolutely not familiar with the
375.
by ruszki 1y ago
If I understand well, my view is not counted as a YouTube Premium subscriber. I’m not sure that anybody is happy with that. Also there is zero good reason to have a separate API for this. Even Google knows this, because Google Analytics has
376.
by ruszki 1y ago
I don’t know whether they are better or worse than others. One for sure, a lot of companies lie on their status pages. I encounter outages frequently which are not reported on their status pages. Nowadays, I’m more surprised when they self
377.
by ruszki 1y ago
There are billions of other possible reasons, like our coding skills can be different, your hackathon experience can be completely different than mine, our care of quality can be different, even during hackathons, our coding speed can be di
378.
by ruszki 1y ago
Then check Netanyahu’s politics.
379.
by ruszki 1y ago
The exact mindset, rhetoric, and politics which caused this are affecting everyone. It drives both right and left politics for over a decade now all over the West - so also in America -, and if you care about yourself or anybody (or your st
380.
by ruszki 1y ago
I reflected only on the comments which you sent to Rossmann; you don’t deny that you sent those AFAIK. I purposefully ignored everything what Rossmann said. As I said, even if you’re right, those comments were mistakes.
381.
by ruszki 1y ago
Once again, there is no context in which strcat’s comments to Rossman would be fine which are in the video in full. Repeating a context won’t change this. Even if the main points of strcat is fine, their style was really, really bad, withou
382.
by ruszki 1y ago
I don’t think that you need to know anything about the drama to know that there is no context in which responses showed in the video are fine. Did strcat apologise for it? I don’t understand these GitHub links either. None of them which I’v
383.
by ruszki 1y ago
If people don’t want to move to the US, then America will get the same treatment.
384.
by ruszki 1y ago
In my experience, this was true also with Google’s version. The first few iterations were great, then went shit. I need only one thing: add diacritics, and fix basic misspellings. Now all of them try to be “smart” even when they should just
385.
by ruszki 1y ago
Why cannot it be both? You definitely have a gun problem, and also a mental health problem. And you even have a mentality problem by thinking that gun is fine on you just to be safe, which is quite acceptable thought over there - the reacti
386.
by ruszki 1y ago
People get an answer, and not the answer. It seems that people are fine with this. Even this article's example answer is false. The author didn't care, and considered it good.
387.
by ruszki 1y ago
If New York Post just "leans right", then AP should post obvious lies en masse every day for the left with non existing fact checking. If the scale is this, then it is a completely useless metric. It puts using "ostensibly&qu
388.
by ruszki 1y ago
Luck. It’s always just luck. Of course, you need to have other ingredients too, but hundreds of millions, if not even billions of people have those skills too. Who win more among them is pure luck. And in that, of course a ton of predetermi
389.
by ruszki 1y ago
Even when you do that, it heavily prefers English content. Whenever I search for some hardware for example, there are several non country related results on the first page. The first 2-3 usually from the selected country, after that it’s no
390.
by ruszki 1y ago
As an outside observer, it absolute looks like that the American government punish people for their speech. Of course, they say something else, like we just kidnap you from the street, or we just revoke your grant, or we just force your uni

More ›