rusini

8 ms·

31.
New Release (0.3 Beta 1) of the Programming Language "Manool"(github.com)
1 points by rusini 7y ago|0 comments
32.
by rusini 7y ago
This was quite unintentional as the main point is how amazingly bizarre it looks. BTW I already had a publication on HN about MANOOL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20599209
33.
Show HN: Conway's Game of Life in 10 Programming Languages(github.com)
10 points by rusini 7y ago|2 comments
34.
by rusini 7y ago
I agree with you in that aesthetically and psychologically, the syntax of MANOOL is not the prettiest thing. But as I already commented, it is a result of trade-offs, and the syntax aesthetics is simply not the main point of the language.
35.
by rusini 7y ago
> no one wants to use GNU/AT&T assembler syntax I am the one who enjoyed using AT&T syntax. It remainded me old-days PDP-11 assembler.
36.
by rusini 7y ago
Well, what about this program?: -- factorial { {extern "manool.org.18/std/0.2/all"} in : let { Fact = { proc { N } as : unless N.IsI48[] & (N >= 1 - 1) signal {if (
37.
by rusini 7y ago
Sorry, I did not had time to add that content (I was in hurry to show my work and at least make an intro, after 4 years of silence and hard work :-) BUT thank you for the suggestion! I will include those benchmarks shortly. Refs to wikipedi
38.
by rusini 7y ago
Thank your for commenting! > This immediately makes me want to read said postcard. Is there something to this effect? [Couldn't find it.] I actually did not do such exercise, sorry :-) BUT: 1) almost all syntactic features are demon
39.
Show HN: Practical programming language with expressive power, in 10K LOC C++11(github.com)
2 points by rusini 7y ago|9 comments