rushingcreek

7 ms·

1. 61.▲
   by rushingcreek 2y ago

   Thank you, I hear you. We'll find a way to make it so you can try some pro features, like automatic additional searches or Phind-405B, for free.
2. 62.▲
   by rushingcreek 2y ago

   This is supported! You can use the https://www.phind.com/search?q=my+question syntax.
3. 63.▲
   by rushingcreek 2y ago

   We use Mermaid!
4. 64.▲
   by rushingcreek 2y ago

   Thank you! Really happy to know that it's working well for you -- we made the additional searches feature exactly for this type of use case.
5. 65.▲
   by rushingcreek 2y ago

   We used a system of LLM critics to generate a high-quality dataset for this. More in the blog post linked in the answer above.
6. 66.▲
   by rushingcreek 2y ago

   Thank you! We actually support "zooming into" different parts of an answer. The chat conversation is now stored as a tree, so you can ask a followup, then revise the followup, and switch between the revisions below the answer when
7. 67.▲
   by rushingcreek 2y ago

   Interesting, do you mind sharing some of the queries you tried? We avoid doing automatic searches for certain followups if the existing sources already contain the correct information, but we should be giving improved sources compared to th
8. 68.▲
   by rushingcreek 2y ago

   We have a products UI on the way :)
9. 69.▲
   by rushingcreek 2y ago

   With this release we are aiming to be simultaneously better for developer questions while also competing as a broad AI search engine for just about any question.
10. 70.▲
    by rushingcreek 2y ago

    Thanks for the feedback. We're working on making the answers a lot faster for the Phind models. I can see how it would be frustrating to be waiting for the diagram to generate when you're waiting for text or for an example.
11. 71.▲
    by rushingcreek 2y ago

    Thank you! We went quiet while we rebuilt the entire product, but now we're back and will do everything we can to stay at the forefront.
12. 72.▲
    by rushingcreek 2y ago

    Ah, great question! We tried using off-the-shelf models and found that they are incredibly bad at generating these visual components reliably, let alone with the nuance (such as color, placement, details, etc.) that would be expected in a g
13. 73.▲
    by rushingcreek 2y ago

    Thank you :)
14. 74.▲
    by rushingcreek 2y ago

    Thank you!
15. 75.▲
    by rushingcreek 2y ago

    Thank you! We do plan to support an API this year. We have deprecated our VS Code extension, however, as we're going all-in on search.
16. 76.▲
    by rushingcreek 2y ago

    We'd love to partner directly with content creators. This is something we're thinking about a lot and are having conversations on how to go about it. I will also personally do everything in my power to keep us from running ads on
17. 77.▲
    by rushingcreek 2y ago

    Thank you! Appreciate the feedback. Custom links are something we should be able to do -- we'll run some checks and make sure that feature is working properly. Thanks for letting me know.
18. 78.▲
    by rushingcreek 2y ago

    Thank you :)
19. 79.▲
    by rushingcreek 2y ago

    Yep, we trained the model to produce Mermaid when a diagram might be helpful. There are a lot of nuances that went into this, such as where in the answer to place the diagram and how to ensure a good contrast within the diagram for maximum
20. 80.▲
    by rushingcreek 2y ago

    Our new 70B is actually completely different from the one we launched a year ago -- we should probably update the naming to make that more clear! What do you think about its performance on your queries?
21. 81.▲
    by rushingcreek 2y ago

    Thanks for the feedback. Have you tried setting your answer profile in https://www.phind.com/settings/profile ? You can tell it to "only answer using plaintext" there and it will be automatically applied acros
22. 82.▲
    Phind 2: AI search with visual answers and multi-step reasoning(phind.com)

    537 points by rushingcreek 2y ago|192 comments
23. 83.▲
    by rushingcreek 2y ago

    Would love to see how DeepSeek R1 compares to O1 here.
24. 84.▲
    by rushingcreek 2y ago

    This is an awesome demo and I hope you succeed. I've dabbled in building a tool of this type and something I've learned is that making single-task demo apps (like chess or snake game) is much faster and simpler than making product
25. 85.▲
    by rushingcreek 2y ago

    As there was no mention of an API for either Sora or o1 Pro, I think this launch further marks OpenAI’s transition from an infrastructure company to a product company.
26. 86.▲
    by rushingcreek 2y ago

    Thanks for the detailed feedback, this is super helpful. We’re working on a complete redesign at the moment to fix the longstanding UX issues along with a suite of model updates. I’ll be in touch over email — I’d love to give you a preview
27. 87.▲
    by rushingcreek 2y ago

    Thanks for the feedback —- can you share a bit more about what you feel has gotten worse? Have you just been using the default model?
28. 88.▲
    by rushingcreek 2y ago

    We're working on a complete redesign of Phind to make it more of a search competitor :) What were the limitations you ran into?
29. 89.▲
    by rushingcreek 2y ago

    Great feedback!
30. 90.▲
    by rushingcreek 2y ago

    Thanks! Have you tried enabling “multi-query” mode in the search box?