Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
runfaster2000
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
12 ms
·
61.
▲
by
runfaster2000
10y ago
Yes. I work on the CLR/.NET Team at Microsoft. Sorry for not disclosing that more clearly. Oops. Yes, Miguel and I are friends and work together frequently. Usually, he's badgering me, asking me when my team is going to deliver so
62.
▲
by
runfaster2000
10y ago
Great point. I agree with you. We know that this is a weakness. We had a planning meeting yesterday where we discussed this very scenario and want to shore up this space significantly. Your point on roadmap is also well-taken. We're on
63.
▲
by
runfaster2000
10y ago
You are correct that Linux is new to many folks on the .NET team. For another set of folks, it's a return to an old friend. Some team members have switched to a favourite Linux distro as their primary computing environment, even at hom
64.
▲
by
runfaster2000
10y ago
We're working on this issue. See open issues: https://github.com/dotnet/cli/blob/rel/1.0.0/Documentation/k...
65.
▲
by
runfaster2000
11y ago
Yes! Check out: https://get.asp.net/OtherDownloads
66.
▲
by
runfaster2000
11y ago
There are these docker images. Do they work for your needs? https://hub.docker.com/r/microsoft/aspnet/
67.
▲
by
runfaster2000
11y ago
The F# team is working on getting F# working on .NET Core. It's an important goal for the team. You can follow their progress: https://github.com/Microsoft/visualfsharp/pulls?utf8=&q=is%3...
68.
▲
by
runfaster2000
11y ago
WCF client is already open. That's a great place to engage. https://github.com/dotnet/wcf
69.
▲
by
runfaster2000
11y ago
MVC is the default for ASP.NET 5, for both apps and services. It runs on both .NET Core and .NET Framework. Same with SignalR. WebForms remains supported and new features go into it each release. It is supported on the .NET Framework. Discl
70.
▲
by
runfaster2000
11y ago
We are making .NET Core OS agnostic as a general principle. The 260 char limit seems like an unwelcome Windows behavior to include in the Linux and OS X implementation. With that removed, it makes sense to also remove it from Windows. That
71.
▲
by
runfaster2000
11y ago
There are two major scenarios that we are targeting on top of Core: - ASP.NET 5 web apps and services - see: https://github.com/aspnet/home - Native executables - see: https://github.com/dotnet/cor
72.
▲
by
runfaster2000
11y ago
Not a competitor. We work closely with the Mono team, specifically Miguel. We are releasing lots of source for them with each .NET Framework release. The Mono team is adopting large quantities of that source to improve Mono. It's a col
73.
▲
by
runfaster2000
11y ago
MVC is also RC. See: https://github.com/aspnet/Home/releases/tag/v1.0.0-rc1
74.
▲
by
runfaster2000
11y ago
It's also good to point out that .NET Core (effectively a subset of the .NET Framework) and Roslyn (C# compiler) are open source on GitHub. See: https://github.com/dotnet and http://dotnet.github.io I'
75.
▲
by
runfaster2000
11y ago
This is another similar answer: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/dotnet/archive/2012/11/13/the-net-fr... .
76.
▲
by
runfaster2000
11y ago
My post had more C# bias than appropriate. .NET Native also supports VB. See: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnetnative . I don't think it yet supports F#, but that's likely on the roadmap. Reflection is s
77.
▲
by
runfaster2000
11y ago
You might take a look at the C# 7 design notes: https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn/issues/created_by/MadsTorge...
78.
▲
by
runfaster2000
11y ago
It happens in both places. You can (and should) test with .NET Native enabled on your local machine. You still upload IL to the Windows Store, and the final native compilation is done there. The Windows Store uses the same .NET Native SDK a
79.
▲
by
runfaster2000
11y ago
You can see a few mentions to .NET Native and UWP here: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/dotnet/archive/2015/07/20/announcing... . .NET Native will RTM on 7/29 as the basis of the .NET tools for Win
80.
▲
by
runfaster2000
11y ago
.NET team member here ... We like to think of .NET Native as a native tool-chain for .NET Core. I say "a" because the Xamarin and Unity (IL2CPP) tool-chains are equally applicable (and we've talked to them about it). The core
81.
▲
by
runfaster2000
11y ago
Here's another one: https://github.com/Microsoft/dotnet/blob/master/dotnet-devel...
82.
▲
by
runfaster2000
11y ago
You can run .NET Core on OS X[1] (and Linux, FreeBSD and Windows). There are plenty of rough edges still, but we're adding more functionality and making it more capable each day. Soon enough, all the .NET Core ports will be just as cap
83.
▲
by
runfaster2000
11y ago
Makes sense. There is a latency of when .NET Framework versions are released and when they show up on Windows Update. Also, customer do not have to install them even when they do show up. Also, some versions don't show up on Windows U
84.
▲
by
runfaster2000
11y ago
.NET Native will expand to other app types. See the last paragraph of this section: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/dotnet/archive/2015/04/29/net-announ... .
85.
▲
by
runfaster2000
11y ago
Strangely enough, the reason that this install step exists is because the .NET Framework _is_ built-in to Windows. For example, .NET 3.5 was built-in to Windows 7. If your app needed .NET 4, then it needed to formally install it on the syst
86.
▲
by
runfaster2000
11y ago
Great. I'm the one (@richlander) who has been spending the most time on docs, including publishing all of the "Book of the Runtime" docs[1]. It's a whole lot easier for others to "follow along at home" if you s
87.
▲
by
runfaster2000
11y ago
.NET Core team member here. I'm glad that you were able to make it all work with the instructions[1] we provided. There are two major pieces that we're still working on, which you call out: - Compiling managed source on OS X and L
88.
▲
by
runfaster2000
11y ago
Nice choice! There is a _lot_ of investment in .NET at Microsoft. The move to open source and the community reaction to it has only made it more exciting and compelling for the company. I get and appreciate the sentiment on "if Microso
89.
▲
by
runfaster2000
11y ago
Working with the "FreeBSD Port Team" was great. The team really lived up to the aspirational name. It would be fair to say that there were people from the port team on the repo and the gitter room ( https://gitter.im
90.
▲
by
runfaster2000
12y ago
Yes. That is the rationale, one more component for an open and cross-plat .NET ecosystem. Also, @migueldeicaza asked us for it, so Xamarin/Mono could use it. It was these two things, together.
More ›