runesoerensen

124 ms·

1201.
Oracle cancels Benioff keynote at OpenWorld(itnews.com.au)
8 points by runesoerensen 15y ago|0 comments
1202.
AppHarbor (YC W11) launches scaling(blog.appharbor.com)
31 points by runesoerensen 15y ago|7 comments
1203.
Codeplex integrates with AppHarbor(blogs.msdn.com)
16 points by runesoerensen 15y ago|0 comments
1204.
Amazon Web Services Launches Amazon RDS for Oracle(phx.corporate-ir.net)
3 points by runesoerensen 15y ago|0 comments
1205.
Heroku is now counting add-on resources instead of apps running
6 points by runesoerensen 16y ago|1 comments
1206.
by runesoerensen 16y ago
It should be noted that these are preliminary prices. I've updated the page so this is clearer. That being said we're quite certain about the pricing structure from what we've gathered so far. Thanks for your inputs :-)
1207.
by runesoerensen 16y ago
I've updated the pricing page to reflect that IO, load balancing, traffic and repository hosting is included. I think that part of being a PaaS is to continually improve the infrastructure for optimal performance for our users, so stuff lik
1208.
by runesoerensen 16y ago
We're monitoring the performance of our beta users apps and will figure out a reasonable estimate of what to expect before we begin charging. In terms of processing power we're currently aiming at performance roughly equivalent of 1/2 EC2 C
1209.
by runesoerensen 16y ago
I think it's equally popular and we're working on supporting Mercurial as soon as possible. A lot of our users have already expressed that they want it ( http://appharbor.com/feedback ) - and we're in the business of making something people
1210.
by runesoerensen 16y ago
The application and build servers are Windows based
1211.
by runesoerensen 16y ago
We do and for now we'll be focusing on implementing rudimentary support for stuff everyone needs. To compete with Azure's Table/Blob storage I think a combination of S3 and SimpleDB (or an rdbms) would be the best option... Obviously we wou
1212.
by runesoerensen 16y ago
Our goal is to make people c# developers use the cloud. I do agree that a lot of c# developers doesn't use the cloud yet, but I don't see how that should keep Appharbor from becoming popular. A more likely cause for the lack of cloud-hosted