ruleabidinguser

22 ms·

1. 211.▲
   by ruleabidinguser 10y ago

   The CIA could surely filll in the gaps if they wanted to, at the very least through leaks to any of the media organizations that would like to see them succeed.
2. 212.▲
   by ruleabidinguser 10y ago

   Any other rezson to disagree? This is literally the only reason to believe in your position over another
3. 213.▲
   by ruleabidinguser 10y ago

   What exactly is difficult here?
4. 214.▲
   by ruleabidinguser 10y ago

   If the story was incomplete do you honestly believe we wouldnt find that out? I dont. EDIT: 1) Wikileaks provides evidence of wrongdoing 2) You respond "Its possible evidence that proves this isnt wrongdoing exists" Your position
5. 215.▲
   by ruleabidinguser 10y ago

   The media.
6. 216.▲
   by ruleabidinguser 10y ago

   It tells us what they can do but it certainly doesnt incentivize trust.
7. 217.▲
   by ruleabidinguser 10y ago

   This problem is instantly saolved if you have more than one source. The answer to this is not "IGNORE WIKILEAKS," and the suggestion that it is makes me doubt your motives, the answer is "READ MULTIPLE SOURCES." There
8. 218.▲
   by ruleabidinguser 10y ago

   These are the most relevant apps to use, it indicates that even when using security apps there is a problem. The message is "WhatsApp is not safe", its not relevant to most people why.
9. 219.▲
   by ruleabidinguser 10y ago

   It sounds like you're just saying this without doing any kind of real comparison between the probably very different scenarios.