Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
rufasterisco
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
31.
▲
by
rufasterisco
2mo ago
i also have a solution 1. People who can't understand how tld works, learn it. Changing the world to accomodate ignorance is not my preferred direction. 2. We don't link the concept of domain names to economically viable for an US
32.
▲
by
rufasterisco
2mo ago
I don't know if English has a word for when you are half confused and half amused, but that is how I feel. From this same article, here is the co-head of the studio that wanted to produce Myst. > “I don't think people realize t
33.
▲
by
rufasterisco
2mo ago
can we pls add /s to to the post title? how can it be that and then inside the article i read > Last year’s indie darling, the Myst-inspired Blue Prince, was funded by a solo developer’s personal savings and the ad revenue from hi
34.
▲
by
rufasterisco
2mo ago
I went there, and walked back to full sessions, mostly to be able to resume chats. As a general principle, why would i want to lose precision? A senior might care about seeing a junior conversation to provide advice. A colleague might spot
35.
▲
by
rufasterisco
2mo ago
I see 2 possible users for a coding AIs. 1. Professional coders. Us. 2. Non-professional users, people that need software to just get X done. I am focusing on non-professionals. If you look at phones you find apps to book flight, book hotel
36.
▲
by
rufasterisco
2mo ago
i feel like 90% of complaints about ram shortages i've read here could be solved by realizing that we mostly update devices for status reasons we would collectively all be better off by being forced to stick to older devices, value sof
37.
▲
by
rufasterisco
2mo ago
I belong to the "hacker-type from the 90s" group and what you wrote really resonates with me. Yet. I worked with clueless managers leading whole dev teams to burnout because they read a book and apply it verbatim, without understa
38.
▲
by
rufasterisco
2mo ago
Because the way we code has completely changed, and there is plenty of room for innovation. I am convinced that the conversation is the primary artifact produce while coding, which is not a common/popular opinion. Still, i love to see
39.
▲
by
rufasterisco
2mo ago
I understand where you are coming from. Yet. Neuralink exists since 10 years, is in clinical trial, has been implanted on a living human being in 2 years ago. The lack of adults in the room to set rules around moral hazard is hardly her gen
40.
▲
by
rufasterisco
2mo ago
You are assuming a naive approach, always pass everything. Pre AI, the equivalent would have been to got blame code you are going to touch to understand in which context it entered the codebase.
41.
▲
by
rufasterisco
2mo ago
Added to my reading list, thanks. I was not really thinking in terms of reusing all knowledge at once. It is useful to be able to see what was the reasoning behind a single PR to discriminate for effort. The difference between copy+paste+ye
42.
▲
by
rufasterisco
2mo ago
https://archive.is/cxD4b
43.
▲
by
rufasterisco
2mo ago
Egas Moniz, cited in the list, got a Nobel for inventing lobotomy to cure mental illness. He did not really embrace some weird idea once he got a Nobel: the weird itself was the reason for the Nobel prize. https://www.nobelprize.
44.
▲
by
rufasterisco
2mo ago
100% with you. Consider just using Claude sessions. Claude has hooks you can use to copy local sessions in the repo. Git LFS can be used to store directly in repo, helping not just with repo size but also with security/privacy/sec
45.
▲
by
rufasterisco
2mo ago
Any non trivial coding task requires a conversation between human and ai. Just have devs commit (or provide however you like) their ai coding sessions. It then becomes obvious if someone has, or has not, reviewed the code, because then they
46.
▲
by
rufasterisco
2mo ago
I don't see the relationship between "fun and learning" and "(beyond) impractical". I enter most of my learning project from the assumption that I could just buy/install whatever I am building and save time
47.
▲
by
rufasterisco
3mo ago
Thanks. Since you are fixing dark patterns, can you also put data privacy links somewhere other than on the gdpr banner? Once clicked is impossible to see them, or at least I could not find them.
48.
▲
by
rufasterisco
3mo ago
in a container a daemon is managing the telnet connection/logins and throws into a parser, that takes grammaries (basically, lists of regexes) and produces events, which are appended into simple files as json blobs (with types: rooms,
49.
▲
by
rufasterisco
3mo ago
I am having a hell of a lot of fun letting agents play and understand a (still alive, human populated) MUD, which I have also played for the last 30 years. It’s mostly my way to play with local llm inference (m5 64gb, gwen3.6 27). It’s amaz
50.
▲
by
rufasterisco
3mo ago
If you have a nearby hackerspace or similar, check it out. Likely they will be able to help you choose and guide you. For me the hurdle was less about finding equipment and more being able to learn from experienced people.
51.
▲
by
rufasterisco
3mo ago
> There is a part of me that wonders if it's partly just how much they can hold in their head right now, though. Even with the greatest articulation and high density of feeding them, the current setups don't allow them to hold
52.
▲
by
rufasterisco
3mo ago
Congrats on releasing this. OTOH all my attempts of driving harnesses via chat have been frustrating because they all fail against the fact that I want to see the code and mobile devices are not really good at that. Better on tablets, but e
53.
▲
by
rufasterisco
3mo ago
separate topic, separate comment i agree with your point: "we" always wrote code and abandoned it the claim here is made against flatpak submissions, which involve pr reviews i think a point being missed is that open source has al
54.
▲
by
rufasterisco
3mo ago
let's be clear op doesn't provide code, so my effort stays at throwing in a claude session and providing code without ANY review trust my numbers as much as you usually trust claude code trust the original numbers as you usually t
55.
▲
by
rufasterisco
3mo ago
Thanks :)
56.
▲
by
rufasterisco
3mo ago
As someone belonging to the group you just described, I like discovering things from first principles, and build them. It’s a big part of how I get to learn things, and find it fun. This thread is helping me see how others addressed the sam
57.
▲
by
rufasterisco
3mo ago
https://activegraph.ai/ The paper’s pip library can be tried here
58.
▲
by
rufasterisco
5mo ago
it's a self enforcing loop local LLMs builds tool that does exactly what user wants, how it wants it, which is bext UX this becomes AI literacy LLMs already nicely bridge the gap form "I want this" to "here's a loca
59.
▲
by
rufasterisco
5mo ago
> the question of cost to be answered. Commoditizing complements. If Anthropic/OpenAI/etc is eating your lunch, make it work with cheap local LLMs , you can beat them on price by having local inference you don't pay (nor n
60.
▲
by
rufasterisco
5mo ago
> Some things are too important to violate just because 60% of people are afraid. We need to avoid this becoming "60% of people should be stopped because 40% disagrees with them". Alas, constitutions have the purpose of defendi
More ›