rtkwe

11 ms·

241.
by rtkwe 5mo ago
They have to trot it out because otherwise there's not much else to pimp about Cohen as CEO and this attempted deal seems much more oriented to juice the total market value of GME to more easily meet the criteria for his recent pay pac
242.
by rtkwe 5mo ago
Also when you count that 7.5B cash on hand as part of the deal to me that's to some extent double counting to include it and the current market value of all of GME's stock. At least part of the stock's value comes from the ex
243.
by rtkwe 5mo ago
I've yet to see a convincing vision of what an eBay physical store looks like that doesn't kind of boil down to a UPS store. The vast majority of their business comes from 3rd party listings and the only real stock they have and s
244.
by rtkwe 5mo ago
There's a lot of junk "science" used in trials because there are plenty of "experts"[0] available to back it up for the prosecution and fewer funds to pay for the countervailing defense expert available to present t
245.
by rtkwe 5mo ago
The "compelling case" was all based on gait analysis which is heavily debunked and while making the case they quoted from reports about gait analysis but left out all the parts about it being an extremely inexact process prone to
246.
by rtkwe 5mo ago
The point is I'm not sure it's novel and not just a PC flavored version of the classic role play jail break that's never really stopped working on these models. If it'd stopped working definitively maybe it'd be mor
247.
by rtkwe 5mo ago
Yeah Alaska plates are fairly rare so you could maybe get away with them not adopting the standard. Hawaii plates are EXTREMELY rare because of the cost of freighting a car over and there's no real reason to register a car in Hawaii th
248.
by rtkwe 5mo ago
Doesn't solve the issue until all 48/50 states have the same standard.
249.
by rtkwe 5mo ago
Not sure of the explanation but it is amusing. The main reason I'm not sure it's political correctness or one guardrail overriding the other is that when they were first released on of the more reliable jailbreaks was what I'
250.
by rtkwe 5mo ago
They broadly decline it for BS reasons betting that most people don't know it's illegal and/or won't try to force them to follow the law.
251.
by rtkwe 5mo ago
Because the expectation that companies police every single bit that crosses their network is completely unworkable. It's functionally impossible to tell a licensed stream from an unlicensed stream, the distinction isn't available
252.
by rtkwe 5mo ago
Even if they could detect that that'd require peeking into every bit that passes through their service(s) looking for offending content AND require knowing it's not a licensed stream. The latter is own can of worms, they can'
253.
by rtkwe 5mo ago
Any action by cloudflare before a court order or notice would be proactive. There's no way to effectively block streamers of live shows because they can create new sites or accounts for each event and by the time they're found, re
254.
by rtkwe 5mo ago
It's unreasonable to expect cloudflare etc to be able to proactively identify legal vs illegal streams. The companies who own the copyrights can't even get that right much less a third party that has no idea if a stream is license
255.
by rtkwe 5mo ago
Yep the only real area that reshoring can provide savings is in shipping and iteration time. The former is cheap compared to US labor and the latter can be solved by having your design team in China too.
256.
by rtkwe 5mo ago
The economics just don't really make sense it's so much cheaper to produce abroad and ship it here, also this isn't manufacturing just the testing labs and these exist to provide rubber stamps of good enough products that may
257.
by rtkwe 5mo ago
I've given up trying to logic out what the court will decide on many issues, they're quite willing to find new legal arguments to allow their preferred outcome in a particular case.
258.
by rtkwe 5mo ago
Splits don't actually force the Supreme Court to take it up on any thing approaching an immediate time frame. There was a split about what "exceeding authorized access" meant in CFAA for ~10 years before the Supreme Court dei
259.
by rtkwe 6mo ago
I think you misunderstand how the courts work. No other court would rule on this case because it wouldn't be heard in another circuit and the Supreme Court is the ONLY court anyone can appeal to after a circuit court, the only other op
260.
by rtkwe 6mo ago
Correct, it's only /binding/ on courts in the same District but they are often persuasive when cited in other districts if the decision is well reasoned and less controversial. This one will likely be contested, the circuits
261.
by rtkwe 6mo ago
It feels like they have to say/believe it because it's kind of the only thing that can justify the costs being poured into it and the cost it will need to charge eventually (barring major optimizations) to actually make money on u
262.
by rtkwe 6mo ago
The problem is it's specific to that API and defaults to uncapped so people who aren't using it and haven't heard about the issues with the Firebase API keys probably won't have set them.
263.
by rtkwe 6mo ago
Rights violations because of federal laws or actions are almost never contained to a particular circuit and if the Supreme Court wants to quietly allow them to continue it can refuse to hear appeal(s) from the circuit decision so without na
264.
by rtkwe 6mo ago
Also there being only 3 collisions since the program started in 2017. There are loads of violations but not many accidents. I'd wager most of the violations happen on the sort of road they mention, 4+ lanes maybe even with a turn lane,
265.
by rtkwe 6mo ago
They'd be at least minorly incentivized to cut down on false positives because 1) they had a review step before sending to the police and 2) if they're cheaping out on that first review and sending loads of false positives to the
266.
by rtkwe 6mo ago
It's the AI term bloat where any application of machine learning or vision becomes AI, it's been happening for 2+ decades now I think it's pretty well established and here to stay. That said it does need to be more complex be
267.
by rtkwe 6mo ago
Yeah it's a definite mixed bag and maybe the solution is to require them to be approved by at least a multijudge panel at the circuit level before going in to place. In effect that basically already happened though, the normal pattern
268.
by rtkwe 6mo ago
It's rarely down to one judge in one county though, most are entered pending appeal and the appeals court can immediately put the injunction on hold or in cases like this the first injunction might come from a circuit court who's
269.
by rtkwe 6mo ago
Under the current admin's policies shrink. After that who knows.
270.
by rtkwe 6mo ago
Seems like a perfectly valid one. If the government is violating the constitution or a persons rights why should there be suits all across the country to get that recognized? Especially when the question isn't on something with a lot o

More ›