Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
rswail
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
31.
▲
by
rswail
3mo ago
Just prompts are not considered to be "direction". The example in the US Copyright Office report was of a client providing "direction" to an architect, which did not provide the client with any claim of ownership over th
32.
▲
by
rswail
3mo ago
There are two different but related copyright problems with LLM generated code: 1. Making a derivative work of already existing copyrighted code that breaks that code's license (eg injecting GPL code in output). 2. Fully LLM generated
33.
▲
by
rswail
3mo ago
Do they offer the same indemnification that the code they generate IS subject to copyright and that you own that? Because the US Copyright begs to differ.
34.
▲
by
rswail
3mo ago
The fact that AI generated code is not subject to copyright means that your contribution is essentially public domain. This means that any license (GPL, BSD, Apache etc) are no longer enforceable on your contribution.
35.
▲
by
rswail
3mo ago
I thought they were "clankers" not "clangers"?
36.
▲
by
rswail
3mo ago
LLM-generated code is not subject to copyright.
37.
▲
by
rswail
3mo ago
Given that the GPL is entirely dependent on copyright to be enforceable, the fact that AI contributions are not copyrightable is something that is going to bite someone big very soon. The US copyright office has released a public report abo
38.
▲
by
rswail
3mo ago
If debugging is the art of removing bugs from programs, then programming must be the art of inserting them.
39.
▲
by
rswail
3mo ago
"Design depends largely on constraints." - Charles Eames
40.
▲
by
rswail
3mo ago
Maybe start with freight aircraft which are less subject to the standard airport gate configuration restrictions? Avoids the issues about people sitting in the wing area and "enjoying" the roller coaster effect when the plane roll
41.
▲
by
rswail
3mo ago
On rentals: Anecdata vs ABS statistics. No one is arguing that rents haven't gone up, but the rise peaked post COVID at ~8% and are now roughly reverted to the mean of 3-4% pa. On smart meters: Victoria has had them for 2 decades now.
42.
▲
by
rswail
3mo ago
Hope HVDC really takes off, having a power network that has solar feed covering 3 timezones as well as multiple latitudes adds to the national solar harvest and grid resiliency.
43.
▲
by
rswail
3mo ago
Smart meters don't make things better or worse, they are technology that enables better time-of-use metering than the century of multiple meters for peak vs off-peak consumption, as well as making meter reading/billing cheaper. Th
44.
▲
by
rswail
3mo ago
In response to your nonsense about Victoria somehow being bankrupt.
45.
▲
by
rswail
3mo ago
Amber offers that in Australia. https://www.amber.com.au/
46.
▲
by
rswail
3mo ago
Victoria has had smart meters rolled out for over a decade. The rest of the states in the NEM are aiming for 2030 to complete their rollouts. Aside from the supposed "contentious" nature of smart meters, which is mostly the RW coo
47.
▲
by
rswail
3mo ago
Bullshit. Victoria's default offer will include the same offer from October [1]. Victoria has a separate regulator because it deregulated its electricity grid before the other states. [1] https://www.energy.vic.gov.au/h
48.
▲
by
rswail
3mo ago
Co-located PV/BESS or Wind/BESS is the best grid solution anyway. The REZs with transmission infrastructure (subsidized by government) will also add to the return. The good thing is that even with over a decade of conservative gov
49.
▲
by
rswail
3mo ago
Victoria has had smart meters for two decades. The rollout started in 2006 and was basically complete a decade later. The other states are aiming for a 100% rollout by 2030.
50.
▲
by
rswail
3mo ago
It applies in Victoria as well. Victoria deregulated its market before NSW/SA/Qld. All of the eastern states (SA/QLD/NSW/VIC/Tas) are part of a single market, with interconnects and wholesale prices set every 5
51.
▲
by
rswail
3mo ago
Because the individualized incentives do not take into account the community benefits. The money saved is distributed across the community, for both those that directly benefit and those that can't (eg renters, apartments etc). The gen
52.
▲
by
rswail
3mo ago
They are, and they are being rapidly rolled out and the "post sunset" spikes are rapidly being flattened by both grid storage and "behind the meter" home batteries.
53.
▲
by
rswail
3mo ago
That's what is happening, the daily supply charge has been bumped up as well as the $/kWh during the other periods. But it will still have the desired effect of shifting usage patterns, especially for people with rooftop solar and
54.
▲
by
rswail
3mo ago
Using "on pace to miss its own forecast" is a weird way of phrasing "OpenAI made it up to bullshit the rubes". Not to mention that being "on pace" is usually a term that means "keeping pace with".
55.
▲
by
rswail
3mo ago
When FSD actually works 100% (or as close as possible), manual driving will become obsolete, we're 5-10 years away. how long until a steering wheel is an optional extra?
56.
▲
by
rswail
3mo ago
No one seems to be worried about the fact that a vibe-coded app or conversion or rewrite is not copyright-able. It is not a derivative, it's a machine translation, without a human author. So if that is released to the public, it'
57.
▲
by
rswail
4mo ago
Thanks, interesting, I like making my systems as stand-alone capable as possible :) What is the primary difference between using an Unbound auth-zone (as described in the RFC) compared to localroot?
58.
▲
by
rswail
4mo ago
What would be the additional load if everyone ran a local caching recursive resolver like unbound? It would need to be built into iOS/Android/Linux/Windows/MacOS but what would be the disadvantages? I can see greater loa
59.
▲
by
rswail
4mo ago
Aren't we reaching the point where there is no "solution" in terms of density and physical dimensions? It's like the speed of light being a constant, or the Planck length being the smallest that can be subject to standar
60.
▲
by
rswail
4mo ago
They effectively funded the legal defense against SCO that was trying to claim ownership of the IPR to Unix/Linux. They bought and funded (and still fund) Redhat which funds Fedora and GNOME and Wayland and systemd.
More ›