Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
rsrsrs86
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
31.
▲
by
rsrsrs86
8mo ago
The irony is, AI coding only works after and if you put a lot of work on engineering, like creating a factory.
32.
▲
by
rsrsrs86
8mo ago
Sadly, this is the most serious comment here. People who are not shocked are people who haven’t seen what a highly educated computer scientist can do in single player mode.
33.
▲
by
rsrsrs86
8mo ago
They don’t make money by being right, they make money by exposing LPs to risk. Zero commitment to insight. Intellectual production goes only so far as to attract funding.
34.
▲
by
rsrsrs86
8mo ago
I hear and read so much shit by VCs. Both in LinkedIn and in private meetings. Specially Menlo says a lot of shit (check LinkedIn). Deloitte and McKinsey, also full of crap. Really. Vcs are choke full of companies that can be cloned over ni
35.
▲
by
rsrsrs86
8mo ago
Nazi states of America
36.
▲
by
rsrsrs86
8mo ago
It’s like thinking a lot of McDonald chicken nuggets are as good as buffalo wings and eating a whole bucket to realize.
37.
▲
by
rsrsrs86
8mo ago
ChatGPT is proud
38.
▲
by
rsrsrs86
8mo ago
This makes no sense at all really.
39.
▲
by
rsrsrs86
8mo ago
It’s convoluted because it’s slop. You can’t even be sure the text came out as intended. It is full of GPT style markers that tell me the author wasn’t careful enough in review. Jolting bullets in markdown and asking for a full article is n
40.
▲
by
rsrsrs86
8mo ago
Article is mostly GPT vomit after a couple bullet pints. If it’s not as easy for others to tell I’ll stay my blade runner style shop that tells who NOT to hire
41.
▲
by
rsrsrs86
8mo ago
I can’t take seriously an article on AI written so obviously using AI. The unmistakable (lack of) style. If the author is not even aware that the rhetoric that GPT produces is unvaried and predictable, how can I believe the author really me
42.
▲
by
rsrsrs86
2y ago
Wasm.
43.
▲
by
rsrsrs86
2y ago
And compute.
44.
▲
by
rsrsrs86
2y ago
If ASI is artificial specific intelligence, I bet your pardon; intelligence can hardly be specific. Intelligence can reflect upon itself.
45.
▲
by
rsrsrs86
2y ago
They have never been thinking. This is important. Predicting the next word is not intelligence.
46.
▲
by
rsrsrs86
2y ago
Well, if you consider the case of a linear regression, fitting on your output will add no new information to the weights. Try that on any notebook.
47.
▲
by
rsrsrs86
2y ago
Please spread the word that predicting the next one is not intelligence. It’s markov…
48.
▲
by
rsrsrs86
2y ago
I feel abdominal pain when I see the words “thinking” or “reasoning” related to LLMs. I feel back pain when I read the crazy, unsound speculation about how the brain is supposed to be like a computer. Serious mistake.
49.
▲
by
rsrsrs86
2y ago
Lol What’s the subnet of the security group of my user group for Aws lambda application in a specific environment that calls kms to get a secret for….
50.
▲
by
rsrsrs86
2y ago
I’ve held the staff engineer title some times and when the company did so my role was to be a sort of backup if some team could not solve something. When I was not allocated to a specific team I collaborated with other engineers on specs an
51.
▲
by
rsrsrs86
2y ago
Typst is simply amazing. I wrote a thesis using latex and boy would I love if I had found about typst sooner.
52.
▲
by
rsrsrs86
2y ago
Don’t get me wrong. Phoenix is wonderful, Elixir kicks serious ass as a language. Jose valim is one of the kindest and most prolific guys I met on the net. I’d use elixir for a solo project any time.
53.
▲
by
rsrsrs86
2y ago
C’mon, you might like it or not, but HTMX is a breeze to play with.
54.
▲
by
rsrsrs86
2y ago
I regret using it. Recruiting risk. Smaller ecosystem. I should have gone for Python.
55.
▲
by
rsrsrs86
2y ago
This really looks like it was generated via an LLM + crawler.
56.
▲
Writing web apps with remote code execution for fun
(github.com)
1 points
by
rsrsrs86
2y ago
|
0 comments
57.
▲
by
rsrsrs86
2y ago
The us idea of free speech doesn’t apply even in the us.
58.
▲
by
rsrsrs86
2y ago
If the good of the society is irrelevant to you, you are by definition a sociopath.
59.
▲
by
rsrsrs86
2y ago
You see, you are a victim of misinformation. You are reaching at an immaterial argument that doesn’t advance the question really. Twitter has not been good to any society, or we would to go throug heaps of evidence on the bad effects social
60.
▲
by
rsrsrs86
2y ago
Yes, some has to call some shots. The state as body politic of the society looks like the right institution to work.
More ›