rsanek

29 ms·

451.
by rsanek 3y ago
Except, you own your car and have to pay to maintain it already. A better comparison would be taxis, which we do pay for per-use, like with a train.
452.
by rsanek 3y ago
it's just a question of roi. if those investments increase your earnings over their useful lifetime more than they cost, then yeah, they're worth it. of course, you need to be an owner that can get the benefits of the increased pr
453.
by rsanek 3y ago
Try italki (real people) or Speak.com (AI).
454.
by rsanek 3y ago
how much are you offering in equity? the issue i had the last time I went through this is that startups seem to expect you to work for 1/4 the pay but receive only single digit percentages for being the first engineer. it just doesn&#x
455.
by rsanek 3y ago
Every 4th or 5th person makes at least $200k/yr in the Bay Area. It's hard to believe but the percentiles are radically different vs. US-wide. https://vitalsigns.mtc.ca.gov/indicators/income
456.
by rsanek 3y ago
https://arcinstitute.org/
457.
by rsanek 3y ago
why would a liquidation preference not have an expiration date? it's wild to me that a VC can ask for this with unbounded time, that goes far beyond protecting from the #1 outcome described above.
458.
by rsanek 3y ago
I've seen fairly compelling evidence of hormone level change in the Western world, though it seems unclear what the exact causes are. An accessible reference is Count Down -- https://www.goodreads.com/book/show&#
459.
by rsanek 3y ago
I use this approach also and it has served me well now for many years. What I really like is that you can break out of the classic 'flashcards' mindset and don't even necessarily need to have it 'test' you for anyth
460.
by rsanek 3y ago
not relative to sales, relative to earnings
461.
by rsanek 3y ago
> Only high-growth, high-margin businesses can get 7x+ earnings Not really, the S&P 500's P/E multiple has historically been at around 15x and now is somewhere around 30x [0]. And with that, we're talking about large,
462.
by rsanek 3y ago
This is mentioned in the third sentence of the article.
463.
by rsanek 3y ago
https://github.com/ajayyy/SponsorBlock
464.
by rsanek 3y ago
At what point is it just two AIs talking to each other, back-and-forth?
465.
by rsanek 3y ago
Looks expensive at $20/month if you want GPT-4
466.
by rsanek 3y ago
This support landed late last year as part of https://github.com/ankitects/anki/releases/tag/23.10 > .apkg imports are able to merge changed notetypes, and can exclude scheduling data
467.
by rsanek 3y ago
I agree; I probably wouldn't go as far as "extremely disturbing." But at minimum it's pretty lame and cringe. I want our leaders to be held to a higher bar, and the head of YC should be above this stuff. The sad thing is
468.
by rsanek 3y ago
I might be convinced that founders tend to be charismatic (they convinced a bunch of people to build their dream when it was just a dream, after all), but your run-of-the-mill CEO certainly isn't.
469.
by rsanek 3y ago
I've generally found that the longer the instruction list, the less likely ChatGPT is to follow each individual directive. It almost seems to split attention, so if I say just "do A" it will do A but if I tell it "do A a
470.
by rsanek 3y ago
I don't see any claims in that article about productivity going up or down after the mandate, however? Just that data was not used to inform the decision in the first place. Would love to hear knowledge of internal data on this either
471.
by rsanek 3y ago
General advice here is that separate decks are easier to review, but a single deck will result in better retention thanks to benefits of interleaving.
472.
by rsanek 3y ago
It does still use SM2 by default -- you have to turn on FSRS manually. https://docs.ankiweb.net/deck-options.html#fsrs
473.
by rsanek 3y ago
FSRS has been available in Anki via extensions for more than a year, and recently landed natively. It can be enabled in deck settings with a toggle. https://docs.ankiweb.net/deck-options.html#fsrs
474.
by rsanek 3y ago
wouldn't be the first time -- https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_100,000
475.
by rsanek 3y ago
Often, it's not that easy. NYT had a good article on this: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/03/11/upshot/office...
476.
by rsanek 3y ago
As I always mention in these threads, these are not mutually exclusive. We can both have empathy for those laid off while at the same time questioning the organization's size.
477.
by rsanek 3y ago
this doesn't require any advanced analysis, it's simple supply and demand. offer up more shares to a market without changing demand and the price per share must go down. think about it the other way -- why would a company ever do
478.
by rsanek 3y ago
if you don't offer a self hosted version you don't have to distribute anything. just force people to use your cloud product
479.
by rsanek 3y ago
why couldn't the same privacy laws apply to digital transactions?
480.
by rsanek 3y ago
check out worldwide production. except for the 80s, it's been consistently increasing for at least 120 years. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/oil-production-by-country...

More ›