rrrx3

8 ms·

31.
by rrrx3 4y ago
Been seeing some tiktoks on this exact scam being run in bars, too - a man/lady will chat the victim up, ask for their phone to put in their number, and then go to cashapp and send themselves money, and disappear into the night. And ye
32.
by rrrx3 7y ago
No more than say, building a model airplane or model car. The movements for these watches especially are relatively cheap - you can find plenty of 7S26s on ebay for right around $20-25 - so the cost of replacing one that you might mess up i
33.
by rrrx3 7y ago
There are clear, well-defined rules around what constitutes a political advertisement, published by the FEC. Some states have guidelines that go further. A smart place to start, instead of feigned ignorance or poorly constructed strawman ar
34.
by rrrx3 7y ago
You don't take money from clients who are representing/selling anything other than goods or services. You evaluate creative & landing pages for each and every campaign. It's extremely simple. The problem is that FB wants
35.
by rrrx3 7y ago
Exactly. I work in digital advertising and we just don't take political or issue based campaigns . The spend isn't worth it. The hassle isn't worth it. The optics aren't worth it.
36.
by rrrx3 7y ago
Your opinion doesn't trump 70+ years of Human Factors, guy. Touch screens are dangerous to yourself and other drivers because they don't provide tactile feedback or physical presence.
37.
by rrrx3 7y ago
I work in Ad Tech. This is on target. The user was lumped into a poorly-constructed lookalike audience because of some stretched interest similarities. What you're experiencing is the confluence of two distinct issues: 1. The CTRs on d
38.
by rrrx3 7y ago
Just because someone blasts out a wall of words screed doesn't make it credible, salient, or logical.
39.
by rrrx3 8y ago
Yes, calling Lotus Notes mediocre is a compliment of the highest order.
40.
by rrrx3 8y ago
> You haven't lived until you've smelled baking cat shit wafting through every room of your house. Oh my. Noooooo thank you.
41.
by rrrx3 8y ago
Why would you be demoralized by this? He's going to get caught and put in prison. You're not. You win.
42.
by rrrx3 9y ago
FAANG -> needs no explanation NVDA -> same RHT -> solid financials, great growth q over q and y over y MSFT -> Nadella has made some massive improvements that reap great benefits MU -> great value for money and great returns
43.
by rrrx3 10y ago
A friend of mine at my last job has had this happen often enough that it's become a goal to set up an interview with himself.
44.
by rrrx3 10y ago
This definition of "luck" sounds more like "risk mitigation" to me. Luck has a clear and easily understood definition.
45.
by rrrx3 10y ago
Thanks for posting this - I had been running into the same issues above.
46.
by rrrx3 10y ago
I had never really put much thought into it, but you're totally right- the expectation was that a chemical company (essentially) would transform itself into a Hardware & software manufacturer. That's a might, mighty leap. That
47.
by rrrx3 10y ago
seems like we can reasonably expect him to come in swinging the axe again, then.
48.
by rrrx3 10y ago
Let's not make any grandstand statements - IBM may or may not be a sinking battleship (I'm inclined to think they are), but not being around in 5 years is a pretty specious prediction. They'll still be around, and still be pe
49.
by rrrx3 11y ago
The "play some good 60s rock" example isn't a VUI breakdown, it's a functionality gap in the backend. One that will probably be fixed pretty quickly, given the way things are headed. A VUI breakdown would be inability to
50.
by rrrx3 11y ago
The Saudis are doing it not just to counter Iran - they also have to compete with South American, Canadian, American, and Russian oil. They've increased the volume of production to keep the prices artificially low in order to squeeze a
51.
by rrrx3 11y ago
Man, this really should be a default functionality of github itself.
52.
by rrrx3 11y ago
Interesting question. Theoretically, no, because ideas are a dime a dozen, and there's no "one true way" to solve a design problem. But I think what you'd run into over time, which may be parallel to the man-month myth,
53.
by rrrx3 11y ago
I love the thrust of your argument, but I think we all know how pragmatically, this will never happen any time soon. Could you imagine a "Bureau of Software Fidelity" or somesuch? We can't even get the post office to deliver
54.
by rrrx3 11y ago
An S-class may last that long, but nearly every other car in that segment won't. I think in that regard, Tesla will continue to carry an edge.
55.
by rrrx3 11y ago
It doesn't matter how "good" the product is if you're not talking to the users and uncovering their need for it. What you've said here doesn't contradict the point of the article - determining an unarticulated
56.
by rrrx3 11y ago
They don't know enough to complain. That's a major part of the problem. Signing up is compelled by misrepresentation of the entire system, the whole way through.
57.
by rrrx3 11y ago
I love this. What a great idea.
58.
by rrrx3 11y ago
Interesting. Looking around at the source now, it looks like it's not optimized to imply that sort of architectural thinking. That's a bummer. I'd love to have seen it take the React style approach of co-locating all the rele
59.
by rrrx3 11y ago
Yes, precisely.
60.
by rrrx3 11y ago
You have renamed "Design Debt," as outlined here back in 2004 by James Shore: http://www.jamesshore.com/Articles/Business/Software%20Profi... Design Debt is not a new concept. It is a common cause of pro

More ›