Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
rprenger
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
31.
▲
by
rprenger
6y ago
In figure 2, those curves are all from one epoch each right? Which is to say the model has never seen the same data twice? It's true you don't need regularization if you've never seen the same data twice, but that's a s
32.
▲
by
rprenger
6y ago
Do you mean the collective action problem? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collective_action_problem
33.
▲
by
rprenger
6y ago
I'd like to hear GPT-3's rebuttal..
34.
▲
by
rprenger
6y ago
The employees of the DOE labs aren't civil servants on the GS scale. They're paid more like defense contractors. The base salaries at a DOE lab can be comparable to FAANG base salaries if you ignore RSU part of the compensation
35.
▲
by
rprenger
7y ago
When we use data parallelism, we're summing/averaging the gradients induced by different parts of the data, not the weights of the model itself. When using multiple models for ensemble methods, we're summing/averaging t
36.
▲
by
rprenger
8y ago
I liked this explanation: https://twitter.com/hugorifkind/status/1072222230791229440?l...
37.
▲
by
rprenger
8y ago
This classification is incomplete without including food with only 1 side, such as the rarely seen "Mobius Bacon".
38.
▲
by
rprenger
8y ago
The more interesting question from an economics point of view is why does anyone bother voting. Since races almost never come down to one vote, your vote almost certainly doesn't matter. Nevermind the fact that more people voted for
39.
▲
by
rprenger
8y ago
I really liked that podcast as well. If I remember correctly, one take away from the podcast that is relevant to a lot of comments below was that the U.S. used to get a net benefit from the weird international mail system. It was more rec
40.
▲
by
rprenger
8y ago
Full disclosure, I currently work at Nvidia on speech synthesis. You can definitely do this on a GPU. We use the older auto-regressive WaveNets (not Parallel Wavenet) for inference on GPUs, with the newly released nv-wavenet code. Here&#x
41.
▲
by
rprenger
9y ago
Kind of funny title given that the speaker says several times in video that it's NOT a hologram