rosnd

9 ms·

31.
by rosnd 4y ago
>Because you don't need to. But GDPR indeed requires it for many kinds of decisionmaking, no?
32.
by rosnd 4y ago
Is this legal in Europe? https://commission.europa.eu/law/law-topic/data-protection/r... >Yes, individuals should not be subject to a decision that is based solely on automated processing (such as algorith
33.
by rosnd 4y ago
>1. That would still be ridiculous. How would it be ridiculous? A water leak in your flat is causing damage to the flat below yours, it's your duty to address this. If you do not address this, someone will in fact go to court and ta
34.
by rosnd 4y ago
You don't need to wear the gloves, you want to have them in the car in case you end up in an accident and your car is rendered unable to keep you warm. Essential safety equipment while driving in the cold.
35.
by rosnd 4y ago
No it doesn't. It just requires an auxiliary heater, which has been a common feature in cars sold in Europe for at least 20 years. It's a feature you can find in cars sold during the 80s, like the W214. > This is not a common f
36.
by rosnd 4y ago
> The nice thing about EV’s is you can have them warmup while plugged in an unheated parking space Just like people have been doing with ICE cars for literally decades? This has been super common since at least the 80s and probably even
37.
by rosnd 4y ago
s/remote start/auxiliary heater/ Fixed for EU. End result is same, ICE car warm.
38.
by rosnd 4y ago
> Pretty much any EV in Europe has a remote cabin heating feature Surely pretty much any equivalent gas car remote cabin heating too, it's a very common feature.
39.
by rosnd 4y ago
Not just bind, unbound also. Unbound uses the hardcoded list of IPs to resolve a-m once and build it's cache, the hardcoded IPs are never used again.
40.
by rosnd 4y ago
And indeed there are no unisex competitions. >FIFA competitions are separated for men and women. This separation must be safeguarded and protected. I messed up here by trusting the first results on google while searching "can women
41.
by rosnd 4y ago
I think the hardcoded IPs are typically only used as hints to initially resolve the root-servers.net domains.
42.
by rosnd 4y ago
I think almost all sports that have separate women's competitions allow everyone to participate in "men's" competitions.
43.
by rosnd 4y ago
There's no such thing as a men's World Cup, women are allowed to play too. You'll have a very hard time finding any women playing at this level though.
44.
by rosnd 4y ago
>So all except n (netnod (EU)) and i (WIDE (JP)) US could just drop the records for those.
45.
by rosnd 4y ago
My gas powered Mercedes heats up just fine without starting the engine. This has been a common feature for like ... idk, 20 years? I think even the 80s W214 had this option, although that used a separate burner system instead of batteries.
46.
by rosnd 4y ago
>DNSSEC doesn't protect you against the American government if you have a .org domain, but I doubt an American court could give Microsoft control over a domain registered under a ccTLD like .de or .ru or .za for example. What? Obvio
47.
by rosnd 4y ago
>What makes the no-ip.org case extraordinary is that Microsoft a) persuaded the court that the domain was being used for malware, and then b) persuaded the court that because of this, rather than doing something normal like compelling it
48.
by rosnd 4y ago
It's like a judge ordering you to hand over your keys to the person living underneath because you have a water leak you refuse to fix. Perhaps the water leak was caused by someone else, but it's still in your apartment.
49.
by rosnd 4y ago
It's a completely reasonable request that has been granted countless of times now. >I do feel like the only way this request was granted was due to total ignorance on the part of the court of anything about how the internet works.
50.
by rosnd 4y ago
It has everything to do with assessing what the desirable state of things would be. It makes perfect sense to examine the positives and negatives, in this case I'd suggest that the negatives of allowing anyone to observe unencrypted ra
51.
by rosnd 4y ago
What exactly do you mean by precedent? Yes, there are a plenty of precedents in the usual sense of the word. Such as this case, https://www.enforcementtracker.com/ETid-851 If you're going to argue (like _djo_) that thi
52.
by rosnd 4y ago
>If your baby monitor signals go into my home and I am able to demodulate them into a clear signal then why shouldn't I be able to? Do you genuinely believe that you being allowed to spy on to your neighbours unencrypted baby monito
53.
by rosnd 4y ago
I've already done that. You're the one arguing that there's some special exemption for aircraft, but have done nothing to substantiate that claim. Besides, with the GDPR it works the opposite way. You have to justify why your
54.
by rosnd 4y ago
"publishing public radio data" could mean just about anything. Your phone constantly broadcasts it's serial number and location to everyone near you, would you therefore consider your location to be public information wheneve
55.
by rosnd 4y ago
>Nobody would even contemplate a public registry of car owners, for instance, but all of those countries maintain one for aircraft. Are you joking? Lots of EU countries have had this, and still do. For example in Finland, https:/&#
56.
by rosnd 4y ago
Do you have any evidence to share which might suggest that GDPR treats private aircraft differently than ... literally everything else? If not, why would we just not accept that GDPR treats aircraft exactly how it treats everything else? Th
57.
by rosnd 4y ago
How is that supposed to be abuse? The website is unavailable because the way they operate isn't legal in your jurisdiction. 451 seems perfectly appropriate
58.
by rosnd 4y ago
> Waze never managed to break through in a really big way and become a huge mass service Are there people who drive in Europe without Waze? Not sure I've met any.
59.
by rosnd 4y ago
This is completely incorrect. Elon owns Twitter, Twitter is responsible for complying with the GDPR on their platform. Elon in fact has a lot to do with the apparatus of GDPR enforcement.
60.
by rosnd 4y ago
> You clearly have no idea what this actually is or how it works, you’re just looking for reasons to defend Musk. Bizarrely What? Where am I defending Musk? You seem to have an unhealthy obsession with the clown. I haven't even ment

More ›