roosterIllusi0n

5 ms·

31.
by roosterIllusi0n 2mo ago
Most of the apps on macos are for fixing os behaviors that make no sense.
32.
by roosterIllusi0n 2mo ago
Microsoft is probably paying companies to not support linux. This looks no different than any other paid exclusivity.
33.
by roosterIllusi0n 2mo ago
Engineers are not the CEOs. The CEOs are gaslighting to justify another self enriching layoff. AI decisions and control sits with a handful of grifting CEOs. Engineers get no say.
34.
by roosterIllusi0n 2mo ago
F-35 took nearly 3 decades. As it stands US tech companies don't want to do high volume low cost drones, so ukraine will likely end up doing it and become the supplier for other countries.
35.
by roosterIllusi0n 2mo ago
Tell the big for profit social media companies to require id and leave it at that. Why complicate things? Republicans had no problems forcing adult sites to require id. If the for profit crap all needs id verification, people have the chan
36.
by roosterIllusi0n 2mo ago
We let CEOs earn unlimited money. They cut all the training to be personally richer. Vote republicans out so we can restore the 1950s tax rates and financial regs that prevented CEOs fron cutting wages and outsourcing to make themselves pe
37.
by roosterIllusi0n 2mo ago
Reading that, we should all conclude that google is acting as an arm of the federal government.
38.
by roosterIllusi0n 2mo ago
Means nothing. Google changed before government data was updated. It was deliberate support of the change. Google is buying what they want by playing ball. It's time to break them up.
39.
by roosterIllusi0n 2mo ago
Google has done this before. They want to know what you click. There were extensions to undo it in the past. Then they seemingly switched to javascript and stopped the link jacking for a bit. Today, you shouldn't be using google for
40.
by roosterIllusi0n 2mo ago
Universities are the type of place you would automatically expect to teach the fundamentals. They do it in every other subject. You should have "coding like a caveman" back to back with "coding like a spaceman". You ca
41.
by roosterIllusi0n 2mo ago
Make it easier to make claims against employers and don't reqiure people to pay for a lawyer. AI help is not going away and criminalizing it is nothing more than making sure only rich people get to use AI against others. Look at how A
42.
by roosterIllusi0n 2mo ago
But keep in mind, they are citing the dumbest case that doesn't matter as justification to disrupt other people's cases. It's absurd.
43.
by roosterIllusi0n 2mo ago
Fix it.
44.
by roosterIllusi0n 2mo ago
Sounds like we should prevent rent increases. Fix the law, don't throw it away. Landlords that cannot afford to be landlords need to sell and go get a real job. No one is entitled to be a lazy landlord taxing other people's exis
45.
by roosterIllusi0n 2mo ago
That is not the same thing at all. That is an actual historical debate. Yes, the sea of japan is technically wrong, but the ones asking for east sea are the ones who also said they would compromise if both names were used. We can prove eas
46.
by roosterIllusi0n 2mo ago
Google doesn't think anyone is going to break them up. The only solution is to break them up when republicans lose power.
47.
by roosterIllusi0n 2mo ago
Google needs to be broken up. The next democratic president will have to break them up into pieces. Future presidents will get to use trump's new powers of doing whatever he wants. With google, there is more than enough bad behavior
48.
by roosterIllusi0n 2mo ago
Let's not gaslight ourselves. This guy was clear. The CEO who knows the least about anything shouldn't be changing timelines. The real solution is to fire the CEO and hire another 1500 engineers as that would greatly increase s
49.
by roosterIllusi0n 2mo ago
Technically opensource stays the same. The special treatment is for closed source OSes that get an additional legal protection for their datamining. We should not be passing laws that legalize the datamining of people.
50.
by roosterIllusi0n 2mo ago
The meeting he had proves he was fired for not scrubbing away facts.
51.
by roosterIllusi0n 2mo ago
Paprazzi take effort and money. It's laughable to say "because paparazzi exists, we should give up all our rights". No one took away private detectives or paprazzi. But if you replace both with a 24/7 never resting and n
52.
by roosterIllusi0n 2mo ago
Why should any of that be a secret? We don't have to give companies rights that normal people do not have. If there is money to be made, let two AIs discuss it. CEOs are way too corrupt and way too overpaid to be trusted. local AI w
53.
by roosterIllusi0n 2mo ago
Then do it. Hypothetically claiming the job can be automated as an excuse to pay people less is older than everyone alive today. Lying to exploit workers is nothing new. Until you actually remove the need for a human, you have to pay full
54.
by roosterIllusi0n 2mo ago
Most companies are controlled by CEOs that are on the board and pay themselves a boatload of free stock. The CEOs make sure their exit requires paying them to leave.
55.
by roosterIllusi0n 2mo ago
This settlement sold the people out. Facebook basically changes nothing while recording even more personal data.
56.
by roosterIllusi0n 2mo ago
They cannot datamine you as well on linux.
57.
by roosterIllusi0n 2mo ago
They are about to be acquired by nvidia.
58.
by roosterIllusi0n 2mo ago
This is nothing new. The most socialistic era of US history was the 1950s with a 90% federal income tax bracket capping yearly income to a max of 5mil a year in 2026 dollars. That is how we ended the great depression. When a CEO cannot per
59.
by roosterIllusi0n 2mo ago
We simply need to bring back that 90% federal income tax bracket we had in the 1950s. If we had the same tax policy today, a CEO or investor would be limited to 5 million dollars a year in earnings. This is what fixed everything. If a CEO
60.
by roosterIllusi0n 2mo ago
We really need to elect people who won't settle cases like this and instead go for a verdict.

More ›