romseb

11 ms·

1. 91.▲
   by romseb 11y ago

   Isn't this just pushing the problem away from us? The problem being: Why do I still click on an article even if I know it will not be worth my time, attention and energy in any way. "Effectively this means that you're not pay
2. 92.▲
   by romseb 11y ago

   With applications like Textsecure a lot of sensitive metadata accrues, still. One way around this can be https://bitmessage.org
3. 93.▲
   by romseb 12y ago

   I met a lot of people who say it is a "Ponzi scheme" and bad for the environment because of the required energy.
4. 94.▲
   by romseb 12y ago

   I think it is worth mentioning that DeaDBeeF is also one of the few players which has support for OPUS.
5. 95.▲
   by romseb 12y ago

   For secure communication we should leave email behind because there's still a lot of metadata when using email. Bitmessage ( https://bitmessage.org ) might prove to be a viable solution to the metadata problem.
6. 96.▲
   by romseb 12y ago

   The FAQ for cryptsetup states: https://code.google.com/p/cryptsetup/wiki/FrequentlyAskedQue... This means that if you have a large set of random-looking data, they can already lock you up. Hidden containers
7. 97.▲
   by romseb 12y ago

   To see so many people on here finding this a useful feature I wonder if there are browser extensions which store the search history (independent of the search provider) client-side. I love how I can access years of search queries for words