Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
romellem
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
61.
▲
TypeScript 5.0 Beta
(devblogs.microsoft.com)
18 points
by
romellem
4y ago
|
2 comments
62.
▲
“If you use React, you should be using a React framework.”
(twitter.com)
24 points
by
romellem
4y ago
|
53 comments
63.
▲
by
romellem
4y ago
The 100k investment (something they announced in Feb 2020) isn't an instant check for 100k, there are several conditions, [details here][1], and the relevant part being: > The way it works is simple: if you’ve worked at Lattice for
64.
▲
by
romellem
4y ago
Is the calculation just that the cost of litigation will be less than the full contract lease? I don’t understand how that could work.
65.
▲
SEC Indictment for $114M Securities Fraud
(justice.gov)
1 points
by
romellem
4y ago
|
0 comments
66.
▲
by
romellem
4y ago
Money well spent, just think of the damage these could do if unpatched. These types of events are a great investment for the companies.
67.
▲
by
romellem
4y ago
I wonder why these Twitter Files didn’t include any partial emails from Trump’s staff, only the DNC where they expedited a ToS violation review. Oh wait, it’s because clearly this information from a “Twitter source” (aka Elon) is dissemin
68.
▲
by
romellem
4y ago
> I wonder if … they self-reported their own ToS violations. Sorry, what “own violations?” And the original sarcasm: you are upset that an employee is reporting violating content that concerns their employer? I didn’t realize that if you
69.
▲
by
romellem
4y ago
Did you miss [the part][1] in this revelation where “in 2020, requests from both the Trump White House and the Biden campaign were received and honored ”? Removing blatantly violating content isn’t controversial, nor is a member of the con
70.
▲
by
romellem
4y ago
Did you read your own source? The Biden team never asked Twitter staff to “handle” anything. They forwarded tweets that [violated twitter’s ToS][1], a Twitter staff member forwarded them for review, and at that point the reviewer said the
71.
▲
by
romellem
4y ago
Awesome, thanks! I too have found Chrome's profiler lacking, so will definitely have to check out https://www.speedscope.app/ .
72.
▲
by
romellem
4y ago
Very interesting, and great work contributing to the open source community! Can you elaborate on how you did the profiling to identify the (potentially) slow parts?
73.
▲
by
romellem
4y ago
I agree with [this][1] idea: > an autocomplete has one chance to reorder per keystroke. if you got it wrong and you have a better ordering a bit later you must “swallow the sadness” (as per the original author of this wisdom) but never c
74.
▲
by
romellem
4y ago
So this number is prime? Cool. const R49081 = BigInt('1'.repeat(49081));
75.
▲
by
romellem
4y ago
> > Redis can be wrong, but both Redis and the Linux kernel can’t. > Yes, they can, and I'd rather avoid argument from authority altogether. Pretty sure that was a joke, considering the overall light-heartedness of the whole p
76.
▲
First Word Art, Last Word Art
(naimark.net)
1 points
by
romellem
4y ago
|
0 comments
77.
▲
by
romellem
4y ago
Why solve this problem when there are other unrelated problems I care about?
78.
▲
by
romellem
4y ago
For small sites, I always reach for vanilla rather than a framework. For example, [a super simple QR Code website][1] I made uses less than 100 lines of JS (minus the QR code library of course :)), plus regular HTML and CSS. Anything larger
79.
▲
by
romellem
4y ago
I applied with the same criteria, and it took about a month to be accepted.
80.
▲
by
romellem
4y ago
I work on a site that gets a small percentage (less than 0.1%) views from iOS 10 devices, which doesn’t support fetch. This still amounts to a few dozen views.
81.
▲
by
romellem
4y ago
Do you also think the [16th amendment][1] should be repealed? Because what you are arguing is basically the same as the opponents of that amendment. [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sixteenth_Amendment_to_the_Uni...
82.
▲
by
romellem
4y ago
If this was around in 2009 it would have made the https://www.onemilliongiraffes.com/ project much easier.
83.
▲
by
romellem
4y ago
FYI, when I sign up with the form at the bottom, the "Thank you! Your submission has been received!" message appears under the white parsnip SVG (`.footer-snippy`) and obscures some of the text. Observed on Firefox v102. Otherwi
84.
▲
by
romellem
4y ago
According to the [indictment][1], they violated [18 USC § 1343][2], when they: participated in a scheme to deprive Coinbase of its exclusive use of confidential business information related to Coinbase's plans to list certa
85.
▲
by
romellem
4y ago
Wow, the indictment references [this tweet][1] that caused Coinbase to investigate the matter and ultimately led the defendant in being caught at the airport before trying to leave the country. > On May 11, 2022, Coinbase’s director of s
86.
▲
by
romellem
4y ago
Interesting, I haven’t heard of this before. It seems like to create an account to you an invite?
87.
▲
by
romellem
4y ago
“Just move” seems to imply they made a choice to live there in the first place. Often that isn’t true. What is a 17 year born in Oklahoma to do? Telling them to “just move” when they probably have very little money of their own and probab
88.
▲
by
romellem
4y ago
It also says the device has a “0.33 L/h production rate,” which is a little less than a 12oz can, so seems like a decent rate to keep one hydrated.
89.
▲
by
romellem
4y ago
Aside from the fact that they are basically generating power sets, if you don’t need all the values at once, a better method would be to use a generator function if all you are doing is iterating. That way you don’t need to create all the
90.
▲
by
romellem
4y ago
This is correct. [This article][1] ([archive link][2]) goes through some of the contract law stuff, and they speak to this: * The merger agreement contains a provision that allows Musk to walk away if Twitter’s securities filings are wrong
More ›