rolls-reus

5 ms·

1. 31.▲
   by rolls-reus 7y ago

   The article has citations to some rulings that affirm the point it is making. "Wallpaper Mfrs., Ltd. v. Crown Wallcovering Corp., 680 F.2d 755, 766 (C.C.P.A. 1982) (“an owner is not required to act immediately against every possibly in
2. 32.▲
   by rolls-reus 7y ago

   I've seen the point you make about trademarks often repeated but it is infact not true. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2013/11/trademark-law-does-not...
3. 33.▲
   by rolls-reus 7y ago

   Wow I remember wasting a lot of time on bash.org maybe a decade ago. That link sent me on a nostalgia trip.
4. 34.▲
   by rolls-reus 7y ago

   Redshift is not eventually consistent, it's fully ACID compliant.